2004 - 2008 F-150

Bilstein 5100s are in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-21-2005 | 12:57 PM
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
What lift do you have on the rear of your truck? The 5100s are for lifted, either 2" or 4". From the looks of the rear, the first time you have a load in the bed and hit a bump, it is going to be compressed all the way.

OE shocks are installed tube down. Personally I would have installed mine tube down. I hit a piece of metal that came up and put a hole in the tube, causing the shock to lose all it's oil. If it had been tube up, the shaft would have been probably bent, not allowing the shock to expand and compress at all.
 
  #17  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:28 PM
Screw2004's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood Ca
His shock's are installed the correct way
 
  #18  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:34 PM
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
I love starting this debate... Up or Down?!
 
  #19  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:37 PM
SAJEFFC's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio Tx
Originally Posted by dzervit
I love starting this debate... Up or Down?!
Personally I dress to the right.
 
  #20  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:41 PM
RED WING NUT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Rock City
Originally Posted by dzervit
I love starting this debate... Up or Down?!
There is no debate, D. Yours are on upside down. Do ya think Bilstein would put their name on 'em upside down?
 
  #21  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:43 PM
hwm3's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by kingfish51
What lift do you have on the rear of your truck? The 5100s are for lifted, either 2" or 4". From the looks of the rear, the first time you have a load in the bed and hit a bump, it is going to be compressed all the way.

OE shocks are installed tube down. Personally I would have installed mine tube down. I hit a piece of metal that came up and put a hole in the tube, causing the shock to lose all it's oil. If it had been tube up, the shaft would have been probably bent, not allowing the shock to expand and compress at all.

All I have done so far to the rear is add the 2" blocks from a 4x4. The 5100s are designated by Bilstein as lifted suspension shocks. I got them because I plan to only add another inch or so of height to the rear, and these will still work in that configuration.

As is sits now the bumpstop will hit about a 1/2" before the shock bottoms out.

As far as tube up vs. tube down, these shocks are designed to be mounted tube up. This is the reason for the label to be applied the way it is and the shock boots have drain holes in the bottom so they won't hold water.

I don't worry about something hitting the shaft and bending it. It takes a lot more force to bend the shaft than it does to puncture the tube. Besides, I ran these same shocks on the rear of my Jeep for about a year, and NEVER damaged the shaft. The truck will see a much easier life than the Jeep did.
 
  #22  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:44 PM
hwm3's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by dzervit
I love starting this debate... Up or Down?!
Well, when you get a chance, you should turn your shocks over so they are mounted correctly.
 
  #23  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:46 PM
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by hwm3
Well, when you get a chance, you should turn your shocks over so they are mounted correctly.
I'm from Europe. I mounted them correctly...
 
  #24  
Old 09-21-2005 | 01:54 PM
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
These shocks can be mounted either way, unlike the fronts or reservoir shocks. I mounted mine like the OE. However there are a couple of advantages to mounting them tube down. The first I had already mentioned. Believe me the piece of steel I hit would have bent the shaft. The hole put right near the bottom of the tube went halfway around the tube. Over an inch long and half inch wide.
The second advantage is the shield has holes in it to let air in and out while compressing. If running thru water, what you are sucking in and out is water, not air. Something the shield is there specifically to keep out. That and dirt/mud. If you are in water deep enough to go in the holes with the shield up, your truck is probably floating.

As for the lettering, my OE replacement shocks lettering is upside down. My understanding is that Bilstein has changed the way the lettering is on these shocks now. Readable with shield up.
 

Last edited by kingfish51; 09-21-2005 at 01:57 PM.
  #25  
Old 09-21-2005 | 02:30 PM
hwm3's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by kingfish51
These shocks can be mounted either way, unlike the fronts or reservoir shocks. I mounted mine like the OE. However there are a couple of advantages to mounting them tube down. The first I had already mentioned. Believe me the piece of steel I hit would have bent the shaft. The hole put right near the bottom of the tube went halfway around the tube. Over an inch long and half inch wide.
The second advantage is the shield has holes in it to let air in and out while compressing. If running thru water, what you are sucking in and out is water, not air. Something the shield is there specifically to keep out. That and dirt/mud. If you are in water deep enough to go in the holes with the shield up, your truck is probably floating.

As for the lettering, my OE replacement shocks lettering is upside down. My understanding is that Bilstein has changed the way the lettering is on these shocks now. Readable with shield up.
Sounds like that would have ruined your shock regardless of the way it was mounted.

So you think if I run through water the boot is gonna suck water in and hold it? I kinda doubt that.
 
  #26  
Old 09-21-2005 | 03:04 PM
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
Originally Posted by hwm3
Sounds like that would have ruined your shock regardless of the way it was mounted.

So you think if I run through water the boot is gonna suck water in and hold it? I kinda doubt that.
Yes but it was drivable and no I don't think it will hold ALL of it.
 
  #27  
Old 10-18-2005 | 07:23 PM
dirk upson's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: riverside,california
his shocks are mounted the correct way.
 
  #28  
Old 10-18-2005 | 10:36 PM
jokergomez81's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: OKC
  #29  
Old 10-18-2005 | 11:41 PM
bamorris2's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 2
From: Northern California
I say that D's (and mine) are installed correctly with piston up/tube down.

Reason being (1) that's the way the stockers are mounted; and (2) the front can ONLY be mounted shaft up/tube down, therefore I'd think the rears would be the same (especially considering #1 above).

Dzervit =

End of story! I have spoken
 
  #30  
Old 10-18-2005 | 11:45 PM
hwm3's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by bamorris2
I say that D's (and mine) are installed correctly with piston up/tube down.

Reason being (1) that's the way the stockers are mounted; and (2) the front can ONLY be mounted shaft up/tube down, therefore I'd think the rears would be the same (especially considering #1 above).

Dzervit =

End of story! I have spoken
So Bilstein prints their name and labels upside down on their shocks? I kinda doubt that.
 


Quick Reply: Bilstein 5100s are in



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.