Well add me to the list for reviews on tuners...
#76
#77
Originally Posted by 05supercrew
That sounds perfect, my biggest complaint is that my truck has not off the line power. One question, the other thing that really annoys me is I have zero passing gear. How does the Edge do in that field? Just as long as the Edge makes a noticable difference I will be happy. Im not really concern with power above 3k. I have my kids in the car most of the time so going fast isnt in my top 10 list.
Jack
#78
05supercrew
You will enjoy the edge tuner....It was like night and day difference on level 2 (87 octane) for throttle response and passing. No dead spots on the gas pedal, has made my truck much more enjoyable to drive.
I do not regret ordering it as I was on the fence for over a month on which tuner. I think the edge would be easier to sell down the road if I had too...........
http://www.discountpowerparts.com/ was the cheapest place I found for the edge.
![thumbsup](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
http://www.discountpowerparts.com/ was the cheapest place I found for the edge.
#79
Originally Posted by Tuff4rd
Would this be a direct effect of the tuners? Anything to worry about?
Thanks
Thanks
I am sure it was directly related to the tune. My factory tune and the Edge tune did not display this problem. It was something I am sure that could have been fixed by adjustment on the Troyer tune by calling Mike up, but since I was pleased with the Edge unit, I saw no need to
![thumbsup](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by MoJoe; 03-01-2006 at 10:31 AM.
#80
#81
#83
#84
Originally Posted by Silverfish
I think the edge would be easier to sell down the road if I had too...........
Now if I can only wait until next Tues. 3/7/06 is the ETA.
![EEK!](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#85
vjhpac
You will not be disappointed...agree on the resell of edge. I do not want the hassle of "dataloging" by going to a dyno and dropping more money.
I did a 0-60 time with the number 2 tune with 87 octane and did 7.10 sec
(bumped up 1-2 shift to -2 and 3-4 shift +10)
I did a 0-60 time with the number 3 tune with 93 octane and did 7.58 sec
(bumped up timing +1)
The number 3 tune shifts harder but the number 2 tune has more low end torque. The engine runs smoother and sounds deeper.
I did a 0-60 time with the number 2 tune with 87 octane and did 7.10 sec
(bumped up 1-2 shift to -2 and 3-4 shift +10)
I did a 0-60 time with the number 3 tune with 93 octane and did 7.58 sec
(bumped up timing +1)
The number 3 tune shifts harder but the number 2 tune has more low end torque. The engine runs smoother and sounds deeper.
#86
Originally Posted by Silverfish
You will not be disappointed...agree on the resell of edge. I do not want the hassle of "dataloging" by going to a dyno and dropping more money.
I did a 0-60 time with the number 2 tune with 87 octane and did 7.10 sec
(bumped up 1-2 shift to -2 and 3-4 shift +10)
I did a 0-60 time with the number 3 tune with 93 octane and did 7.58 sec
(bumped up timing +1)
The number 3 tune shifts harder but the number 2 tune has more low end torque. The engine runs smoother and sounds deeper.
I did a 0-60 time with the number 2 tune with 87 octane and did 7.10 sec
(bumped up 1-2 shift to -2 and 3-4 shift +10)
I did a 0-60 time with the number 3 tune with 93 octane and did 7.58 sec
(bumped up timing +1)
The number 3 tune shifts harder but the number 2 tune has more low end torque. The engine runs smoother and sounds deeper.
#87
Your 0-60's are better than mine, and look at all the mods I have, including the Troyer tuned XCal2.
#88
Datalogging is something that must be done to complete "custom" tuning. The gains are there without datalogging. It's just not optimized for your truck until you datalog. You'd probably won't notice the difference at all datalogged vs. non-datalogged.
Last edited by hwm3; 03-01-2006 at 10:06 PM.
#89
Originally Posted by nvrenuff
There are WAY to many variables to consider if you are trying to compare your 0-60 times to his, if you were testing at the same time in the same conditions at the same place and with the exact same timing method, then you can compare. Don't sweat it.
#90
Originally Posted by Josiah
Yeah and my 4wd Supercrew has a lot to do with it. Regardless, these are the best ways to compare our times as of now and that's pretty pathetic he is doing so well. I would hope I'd smoke someone like him (and yes I've taken into account configurations, options, etc). You can make several excuses but I don't think road conditions have a lot to do with it as I don't have wheelspin, temps really don't make much of a difference because I am pretty consistent with my 0-60's. I'm not trying to pick on you, just letting you know where my frustrations come from.
Josiah, what are your 0-60's? I still do not count on these units to be dead on with times, but it gives you a good idea. I got down to a 7.35, 7.63, 7.44 and a 7.24 on level 3 with mild adjustments on my SCREW recently. I just loaded the latest updates for my unit tonight so I need to test thoughs out now. I also wanted to get some runs in between level 2 and 3. I am still not certain my numbers are even close until I get to the track this Spring for my own amusement.
![thumbsup](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Like hwm3 posted, I would still get some datalogging first and go from there to see how much improvement is there. Not sure if you have done that yet, sorry if you have.
![Wink](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.f150online.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)