2004 - 2008 F-150

The infamous debate...(4.6 vs. 5.4)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-19-2011, 05:03 PM
HomeGrownF150's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like Stealth said, a lot of folks are gonna be biased based on their purchase. I bought an '05 4.6l because I was in a pinch and it was the only well priced one on the lot, no regrets. It's got enough grunt for hauling quads, camping and fishing gear, and what not and it handles the occasional towing just fine.

As I said in another thread, the 4.6 will do everything most people use a half-ton for just fine. It won't win any races, get a car for that, and it won't tow a house behind it, buy an F350 for that. It will haul what you need, tow when you need to tow (I've towed over 7k behind her once), and it'll get you around worry free.

Buy what you think you want and need. I may be more inclined to shop around when I get my next truck, but I'm hoping by then I can get a used EcoBoost For now, the 4.6 is just fine. NOT TO MENTION I came from driving older half-ton Chevys, this things got more nut than any of those did, even if I do miss having a manual trans
 
  #17  
Old 05-19-2011, 05:16 PM
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Mileage between a 5.4 & 4.6 is a wash! Get the 5.4 you will be happier in the long run!
 
  #18  
Old 05-19-2011, 06:03 PM
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 10,725
Received 37 Likes on 33 Posts
I have driven each and I see nothing wrong with the 4.6. I drove a 2007 5.4 Lariat Screw 4wd and it felt good as did the 2006 5.4 scab 4wd and the 2006 Screw 4wd 4.6. I'm sorry, I highly disagree when people complain about power from the 4.6. I think people expect too much out of a truck that weighs as much as they do. This is coming from a 5.4 owner too. I ended up finding a gem... insanely low priced and really low mileage 2004 2wd 5.4 scab (loaded xlt - nearly all options you could get) back when I was buying in 09. I like the power my 5.4 has and even more so since I've had it tuned. But the 4.6 is a great engine, especially if you are just driving around/commuting. If my truck had a 4.6, I'd care less. It's a commuter vehicle for me. The 4.6 is reliable and nearly bullet proof. The one you listed, I'd take it: your favorite color, in that good of shape and low mileage. That's a no brainier imo. There's no such thing as a perfect used vehicle. It's always a compromise. You can always have it custom tuned and I bet you'd like it even more. Oh and my brother has a 2010 4.6 2v 2wd screw. It's not underpowered (not pulling a trailer of course)
 
  #19  
Old 05-19-2011, 09:35 PM
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member


Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Burleson, Texas
Posts: 17,118
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I went with the 5.4 because at the time in 05 Ford was discounting them to almost the same cost as the 4.6, and the fuel economy difference was negligible. Plus Ford was offering the free tow package.
 
  #20  
Old 05-19-2011, 10:18 PM
Brabbit's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would drive both and decide for myself.
I've towed 4500lbs with my 4.6 100 miles one way up and down steep hills on the interstate without a problem on a couple of occasions hauling a tractor and a car once with no issues, but you wont win any races with it either.
I'm not sure that I would trade mine straight up for an identical one with a 5.4 after reading about the "cam phaser issues" and the dreaded "plug changes" on the 5.4. (well maybe if it was a Raptor )
 
  #21  
Old 05-19-2011, 10:34 PM
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i get better mpg then any 4.6L Ive seen.

plus its nice having the extra power down low.
 
  #22  
Old 05-20-2011, 08:27 AM
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Douglasville GA
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by snopro31
i get better mpg then any 4.6L Ive seen.

plus its nice having the extra power down low.
How much?

(Back on topic)
I only got mine so that I could get away from my Ford Ranger. I only cared that it had a V8. Wouldn't even bother if it had a V6. Since I only use it as a daily driver, the 5.4 wouldn't get to stretch its legs much in terms of towing performance, but the added power in my current trucks configuration would have been highly desireable.
 
  #23  
Old 05-20-2011, 09:10 AM
racerx1307's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Write down the Pro/Cons of each, sometimes when you see it on paper the answer is in front of you. If that’s still a wash here’s a tip I used. Take the 2 trucks and call them equal on the pro/con. List the things you don’t like and would have to deal with if you bought truck A or B. Now list how to address them. For example. You said you didn’t like red too much. You could paint it but that’s a big expense you might not want to do, or maybe your buddy works in a body shop and it’s no big deal. The 4.6, it might lack a little power for your towing in the long run. Plenty of go fast / HP bolt on’s out there. In my in no way data driven opinion, I bet a tuned 4.6 v a stock 5.4 would be a close battle if not the winner.

Have fun shopping.
 
  #24  
Old 05-20-2011, 12:32 PM
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Administrator
Contributor
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 21,312
Received 135 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by snopro31
i get better mpg then any 4.6L Ive seen.
Ill take you up on the bet
 
  #25  
Old 05-20-2011, 01:58 PM
SlammaJamma's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks again for all the input. Unfortunately, the Gray truck with the 4.6 sold the very next day. I just pulled a Car-Fax on the red truck w/5.4 and found out that it was originally a Rental. That is a deal-breaker for me so I am back on the hunt. I have found several in Houston that I'm interested in but I won't have time to make that trip for another week or 2.
 
  #26  
Old 05-20-2011, 02:30 PM
SoonerTruck's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 2,230
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
That graph looks like what my data would be with the 5.4L, but I don't recall ever getting through a tank with more than 18mpg out of it all hwy at 60mph. I average 15-16mpg mixed driving.
 
  #27  
Old 05-20-2011, 10:28 PM
ozark f150's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gas for either is damn near the same...I drove my 04 5.4 from missouri to wyoming and averaged around 18 to, my buddy has an 06 4.6 and recently drove from wyoming to texas and said he got around 17, but he's a younger guy. I'm older and a tight wad so driving habits are the only difference I see
 
  #28  
Old 05-20-2011, 10:55 PM
06yz250f's Avatar
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you find a truck in north houston that you want looked at PM me.
 
  #29  
Old 05-21-2011, 01:55 AM
Mark Miller's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO,2005-2008 i would go with the 5.4 for the extra power.Now if you were asking about 2009-2010 i would give the nod to the 4.6 3V with the 6 speed automatic.I have a 2010 F-150 F-150 Supercab 4X4 4.6 3V,6 speed automatic 3.73 gears.To my suprise i had a 2007 F-150 Supercab 4X4 5.4 3V,4 speed automatic and 3.55 gears.I raced them both 2010 F-150 16.25 at 84.89 mph and 2007 F-150 16.65 at 83.23 mph.

Later Mark.
 

Last edited by Mark Miller; 05-21-2011 at 01:57 AM. Reason: Spelling mistake
  #30  
Old 05-21-2011, 08:10 AM
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4.6 Punisher
How much?

(Back on topic)
I only got mine so that I could get away from my Ford Ranger. I only cared that it had a V8. Wouldn't even bother if it had a V6. Since I only use it as a daily driver, the 5.4 wouldn't get to stretch its legs much in terms of towing performance, but the added power in my current trucks configuration would have been highly desireable.
I get 22 on the highway at 63mph.

Originally Posted by Patman03SprCrw
Ill take you up on the bet

my 5.4 gets those mpg all the time.
 


Quick Reply: The infamous debate...(4.6 vs. 5.4)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.