ride quality questions. what to replace AS level with.
#1
ride quality questions. what to replace AS level with.
truck in question is an 07 lariat, 1.5 autospring, nothing in the rear, load range e terra grapplers.
went to my buddies farm to hunt today, we were riding around in the fields in his 04 ish tundra with 114k on it and i was very impressed with the ride quality. rode like a cadillac through fields full of potholes and dips and stumps. very impressive, no interior squeaks or anything either, very nice.
so it got me to thinking, how some say that a leveling kit doesent ride very well, like it decreases ride quality? is there any truth to that?
I know my load range e terra grapplers arent helping, but i feel like i could get it better.
some say that the bilstein 5100s ride better than stock, but ive always thought they were a stiffer alternative. so does that leave me with ranch quicklifts in the front, and the matching rs9000s in the back for the best ride quality? that is unless the spacer on the stock shocks doesnet hurt ride quality then im assuming something like the as level kit ive got now plus stock ride height rancho rs5000s (like the fx4's) would be a good alternative
i rarely pull loads, so loosing some stiffness in the back isnt a big concern. and the fronts only 1.5 inches, id actually like to go to 2 inches in the front.
so what setups in you guys' opinion gets a good ride quality? and how do tundras ride so damn nice? not that id own one, he said he was about to get the undercoating recall(yuck)
went to my buddies farm to hunt today, we were riding around in the fields in his 04 ish tundra with 114k on it and i was very impressed with the ride quality. rode like a cadillac through fields full of potholes and dips and stumps. very impressive, no interior squeaks or anything either, very nice.
so it got me to thinking, how some say that a leveling kit doesent ride very well, like it decreases ride quality? is there any truth to that?
I know my load range e terra grapplers arent helping, but i feel like i could get it better.
some say that the bilstein 5100s ride better than stock, but ive always thought they were a stiffer alternative. so does that leave me with ranch quicklifts in the front, and the matching rs9000s in the back for the best ride quality? that is unless the spacer on the stock shocks doesnet hurt ride quality then im assuming something like the as level kit ive got now plus stock ride height rancho rs5000s (like the fx4's) would be a good alternative
i rarely pull loads, so loosing some stiffness in the back isnt a big concern. and the fronts only 1.5 inches, id actually like to go to 2 inches in the front.
so what setups in you guys' opinion gets a good ride quality? and how do tundras ride so damn nice? not that id own one, he said he was about to get the undercoating recall(yuck)
#2
Worn out shocks with little rebound and compression quality would seem to ride like you're on a cloud off-road, but put that same rig through its paces on road and see what you get. The Rancho 9000s do have a wide range of adjustment from soft to firm, so you can have your cake and eat it too, especially with the remote shock controller.
#3
#5
Don't waste your time with anything less than the 5100s or 9000s. Most of the lower end aftermarket shocks are all the same until you reach that level, regardless of manufacterer. Using the stock setting with your spacer or removing the spacer and lifting the truck with the shocks is up to you, but I doubt you will see a difference in ride either way.
#6
#7
the bilsteins arent stiffer than stock?
the guy the posted right after my OP, said that shocks that are worn out will give a better ride( they are softer) what i get is a rough ride, almost like riding in my lowered mustang.
so if i want better ride quality (handing bump wise, not cornering wise) should i let my shocks and struts wear out, or replace them with better ones?
the guy the posted right after my OP, said that shocks that are worn out will give a better ride( they are softer) what i get is a rough ride, almost like riding in my lowered mustang.
so if i want better ride quality (handing bump wise, not cornering wise) should i let my shocks and struts wear out, or replace them with better ones?
Trending Topics
#9
If i were you i would go with the QLs just for the adjustabillity. I went back and forth between the two. I love the bilsteins , but in your case I would go QL.
#10
#11
right, im not exactly looking for stiffer, kinda more soft. my terra grapplers stiffened things up quite a bit, driving my truck through a field is like riding in a dump truck. how do leveling struts give better geometry than a leveling kit? how do leveling shocks achieve their lift?
so if i do quick lifts and rs9000s in the rear, i can set them up to be softer that what ive got now?>
so if i do quick lifts and rs9000s in the rear, i can set them up to be softer that what ive got now?>
#12
Rancho Quicklift & RS9000XL shocks for replacement FTW.
#14
truck in question is an 07 lariat, 1.5 autospring, nothing in the rear, load range e terra grapplers.
went to my buddies farm to hunt today, we were riding around in the fields in his 04 ish tundra with 114k on it and i was very impressed with the ride quality. rode like a cadillac through fields full of potholes and dips and stumps. very impressive, no interior squeaks or anything either, very nice.
so it got me to thinking, how some say that a leveling kit doesent ride very well, like it decreases ride quality? is there any truth to that?
I know my load range e terra grapplers arent helping, but i feel like i could get it better.
some say that the bilstein 5100s ride better than stock, but ive always thought they were a stiffer alternative. so does that leave me with ranch quicklifts in the front, and the matching rs9000s in the back for the best ride quality? that is unless the spacer on the stock shocks doesnet hurt ride quality then im assuming something like the as level kit ive got now plus stock ride height rancho rs5000s (like the fx4's) would be a good alternative
i rarely pull loads, so loosing some stiffness in the back isnt a big concern. and the fronts only 1.5 inches, id actually like to go to 2 inches in the front.
so what setups in you guys' opinion gets a good ride quality? and how do tundras ride so damn nice? not that id own one, he said he was about to get the undercoating recall(yuck)
went to my buddies farm to hunt today, we were riding around in the fields in his 04 ish tundra with 114k on it and i was very impressed with the ride quality. rode like a cadillac through fields full of potholes and dips and stumps. very impressive, no interior squeaks or anything either, very nice.
so it got me to thinking, how some say that a leveling kit doesent ride very well, like it decreases ride quality? is there any truth to that?
I know my load range e terra grapplers arent helping, but i feel like i could get it better.
some say that the bilstein 5100s ride better than stock, but ive always thought they were a stiffer alternative. so does that leave me with ranch quicklifts in the front, and the matching rs9000s in the back for the best ride quality? that is unless the spacer on the stock shocks doesnet hurt ride quality then im assuming something like the as level kit ive got now plus stock ride height rancho rs5000s (like the fx4's) would be a good alternative
i rarely pull loads, so loosing some stiffness in the back isnt a big concern. and the fronts only 1.5 inches, id actually like to go to 2 inches in the front.
so what setups in you guys' opinion gets a good ride quality? and how do tundras ride so damn nice? not that id own one, he said he was about to get the undercoating recall(yuck)
#15