lower control arm
#5
Does it really matter?
I'm sure our friends at Ford did their homework on this and found they could save money (savings not passed on to us), reduce unsprung weight, improve manufacturing process control (stamping vs casting) (oh wait, that's just a cost savings), etc all while achieving the end use performance we need.
Anyone notice any negatives to this change?
I'm sure our friends at Ford did their homework on this and found they could save money (savings not passed on to us), reduce unsprung weight, improve manufacturing process control (stamping vs casting) (oh wait, that's just a cost savings), etc all while achieving the end use performance we need.
Anyone notice any negatives to this change?
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
There are a variety of articles mentioning the lower control arm and the reason why Ford replaced the aluminum with steel. The aluminum lower control arm has been a known weak point in the front suspension. You guys make me chuckle with your speculation in face of the facts.
Ford went through great efforts to save weight on the current design including an expensive to produce aluminum hood. It makes no sense that a slightly heavier but stronger steel lower control arm was chosen because of cost.
Ford went through great efforts to save weight on the current design including an expensive to produce aluminum hood. It makes no sense that a slightly heavier but stronger steel lower control arm was chosen because of cost.
#11