Those running E85
#19
My point was simply that the performance increase is "free" and therefore worthwhile.
Headers, a tune (chip), cold air intakes and so on won't improve performance more than E85 does. AND, they AIN'T free.
#20
#23
x2. We had a BP station that sold E85 and the regular unleaded gasoline was straight gas, no E10. Before they switched over to E10, the straight 87-octane gas was cheaper than the gas station across the street selling E10 only by 3-4 cents a gallon. Plus you retain your factory MPGs. Sadly they just made the Florida-mandatory E10 switch so now I'm back down to single-digits
#24
How do you figure??
What do the farmers use to make/create the ethanol? (farm equipment) which uses what as an energy source? gas or disel, not changing polution just diverting it elsewhere!
#27
I was simply trying to point out a positive on this topic.
#28
#29
I believe that farmers farm roughly the same amount of land that they always have, therefore they use the same amount of fuel (gas or diesel), therefore they are polluting the same amount not more as you speculated to. There is many more vehicles on the roads than there is tractors in fields polluting.
I was simply trying to point out a positive on this topic.
I was simply trying to point out a positive on this topic.
According to Cornell University professor of agriculture David Pimentel, producing ethanol actually creates a net energy loss. According to his calculations, producing corn and processing it into 1 gallon (3.7 liters) of ethanol requires 131,000 BTUs of energy; but 1 gallon of ethanol contains only 77,000 BTUs [source: Health and Energy]. And since farmers are using fossil-fuel-powered equipment to plant, maintain and harvest the corn and are using fossil-fuel-powered machinery to process that corn into ethanol and then, in almost all cases, to ship the product to collection points via fuel-powered transport, the ethanol industry is actually burning large amounts of gasoline to produce this alternative fuel. That ethanol could end up containing less energy than the gasoline consumed to produce it.
E85 produces 27 percent less energy per gallon than gasoline, so on average it ends up costing more.
Read more: http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story....#ixzz0xflAarIx
#30
This thread started asking is it worth it? Does it do anything to your MPG.. The answer plain and simple is yes, its worse! While yes it (may) be cheaper the overall effeciency isnt worth it!
So if ya wanna go GREEN, then go for it. If ya wanna get more out of what ya pay for and save a lil money while your at it, then stick with gas! After all I didnt buy my F-150 Screw for its (green) qualities!