2009 - 2014 F-150

Those running E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 08-24-2010, 09:53 PM
150xlt's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
After reading this i think i am going to give it a shot. I mainly just wanna see what the fuel economy does with it.
 
  #17  
Old 08-24-2010, 10:41 PM
zitterich246's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive been getting around 15 mpg running E85. I drive mostly highway. I have noticed a little bit better performance.
 
  #18  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:05 AM
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: north Texas
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the 5.4 engine (4x2) the Ford brochure says:

unleaded: 14 city 20 hwy

e85 10 city 14 hwy


I will pass. MPG is bad enough as it is
 
  #19  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:09 AM
cujet's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: west palm, fl
Posts: 263
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
For the 5.4 engine (4x2) the Ford brochure says:

unleaded: 14 city 20 hwy

e85 10 city 14 hwy


I will pass. MPG is bad enough as it is
Understandable. However, when you factor in the cost of E85 being 50+ cents lower, the cost per mile is unchanged. My gas tank is 36 gallons, so the reduced MPG does not result in stopping too often for gas.

My point was simply that the performance increase is "free" and therefore worthwhile.

Headers, a tune (chip), cold air intakes and so on won't improve performance more than E85 does. AND, they AIN'T free.
 
  #20  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:16 AM
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: north Texas
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We only have E10 here (and I mean you don't have a choice as that's all they sell). It's not cheaper than unleaded and mileage goes down a little.

If the drop in mpg pencils out v.s. cost then I wouldn't have a problem buying it.
 
  #21  
Old 08-25-2010, 10:24 AM
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Roanoke, Texas
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll have to try the E-85 next time I fill up and report back. My mileage sucks anyway, so that won't be an issue.
 
  #22  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:54 PM
f4ipilot's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One advantage with e85 is you are supporting the American farmers vs the foreign oil countries. Also ethanol is supposed to pollute less.
 
  #23  
Old 08-25-2010, 04:05 PM
Raptor05121's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Live Oak, FL
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
We only have E10 here (and I mean you don't have a choice as that's all they sell). It's not cheaper than unleaded and mileage goes down a little.

If the drop in mpg pencils out v.s. cost then I wouldn't have a problem buying it.
x2. We had a BP station that sold E85 and the regular unleaded gasoline was straight gas, no E10. Before they switched over to E10, the straight 87-octane gas was cheaper than the gas station across the street selling E10 only by 3-4 cents a gallon. Plus you retain your factory MPGs. Sadly they just made the Florida-mandatory E10 switch so now I'm back down to single-digits
 
  #24  
Old 08-25-2010, 06:39 PM
johnnie555's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you figure??

Originally Posted by f4ipilot
One advantage with e85 is you are supporting the American farmers vs the foreign oil countries. Also ethanol is supposed to pollute less.
What do the farmers use to make/create the ethanol? (farm equipment) which uses what as an energy source? gas or disel, not changing polution just diverting it elsewhere!
 
  #25  
Old 08-25-2010, 07:52 PM
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Angelo, TX
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Damn i must be back woods, never even seen a E85 pump
 
  #26  
Old 08-25-2010, 08:33 PM
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Roanoke, Texas
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uh, yeah, you are in San Angelo after all. I wouldn't say backwoods, maybe west Texas back desert? Just kidding
 
  #27  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:01 PM
f4ipilot's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnie555
What do the farmers use to make/create the ethanol? (farm equipment) which uses what as an energy source? gas or disel, not changing polution just diverting it elsewhere!
I believe that farmers farm roughly the same amount of land that they always have, therefore they use the same amount of fuel (gas or diesel), therefore they are polluting the same amount not more as you speculated to. There is many more vehicles on the roads than there is tractors in fields polluting.

I was simply trying to point out a positive on this topic.
 
  #28  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:40 PM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,277
Received 773 Likes on 714 Posts
Whether you grow corn for ethanol or for food, the farming costs and impacts are the same, right? I would think the corn farmers should be glad that they have the additional market.
 
  #29  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:50 PM
johnnie555's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by f4ipilot
I believe that farmers farm roughly the same amount of land that they always have, therefore they use the same amount of fuel (gas or diesel), therefore they are polluting the same amount not more as you speculated to. There is many more vehicles on the roads than there is tractors in fields polluting.

I was simply trying to point out a positive on this topic.
LoL.. Do you live in Farm Country?? Yeah they (may) farm the same amount of land, but its (what) they are farming more of.. i.e Corn which is what is used for (E85) so therefore your pollutiong (towards the pupose of preventing the pollution) which is all the hype about E85.. Its all a bunch of political BS.. Putting money in someone else's wallet..

According to Cornell University professor of agriculture David Pimentel, producing ethanol actually creates a net energy loss. According to his calculations, producing corn and processing it into 1 gallon (3.7 liters) of ethanol requires 131,000 BTUs of energy; but 1 gallon of ethanol contains only 77,000 BTUs [source: Health and Energy]. And since farmers are using fossil-fuel-powered equipment to plant, maintain and harvest the corn and are using fossil-fuel-powered machinery to process that corn into ethanol and then, in almost all cases, to ship the product to collection points via fuel-powered transport, the ethanol industry is actually burning large amounts of gasoline to produce this alternative fuel. That ethanol could end up containing less energy than the gasoline consumed to produce it.


E85 produces 27 percent less energy per gallon than gasoline, so on average it ends up costing more.


Read more: http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story....#ixzz0xflAarIx
 
  #30  
Old 08-25-2010, 10:05 PM
johnnie555's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by glc
Whether you grow corn for ethanol or for food, the farming costs and impacts are the same, right? I would think the corn farmers should be glad that they have the additional market.
Farming impacts the same?? NO because Farmers are starting to grow MORE corn therefore driving up the cost of other crops (because less people are farming them) It is also making the cost of corn rise significantly! Thus increasing the prices of things that are corn based or that include corn.. yeah corn farmers are happy that there's more of a demand for their product! not gonna argue that..But all E85 is doing is putting a bandaid on our Petroleom fix.. and diverting costs elsewhere..

This thread started asking is it worth it? Does it do anything to your MPG.. The answer plain and simple is yes, its worse! While yes it (may) be cheaper the overall effeciency isnt worth it!

So if ya wanna go GREEN, then go for it. If ya wanna get more out of what ya pay for and save a lil money while your at it, then stick with gas! After all I didnt buy my F-150 Screw for its (green) qualities!
 


Quick Reply: Those running E85



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.