E85 Ethanol Question
#1
#2
#6
I've been tracking my mileage over the last 8k miles with mixed E85 and regular.....
So far, I've found that I've been getting about 70% efficiency out of E85, and that is roughly what the cost differential is.
If E85 is 70% or lower than Regular Unleaded, then I'd say go for it....otherwise, no.
So far, I've found that I've been getting about 70% efficiency out of E85, and that is roughly what the cost differential is.
If E85 is 70% or lower than Regular Unleaded, then I'd say go for it....otherwise, no.
#7
Read the following artice to understand why ethanol:
1) increases smog
2) decreases mpg
3) will destroy your car
http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyl...514_058678.htm
1) increases smog
2) decreases mpg
3) will destroy your car
http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyl...514_058678.htm
Trending Topics
#8
Living in the midwest- farmers all around, i am always asked why I dont run E85. I tell them the following.
I did run 3 tanks full ( thats a little less than 108 gallons, having a 36gal tank not running to E )
Here is what i found.
*MPG sinks.
*Cost savings is not that much, and is wiped out when you figure out what your MPG goes down too.
*power gains are not noticable
I believe ethanol is a good additive in fuel. but is not a very good 'fuel' alternative. Besides all of the water and power used to make it , seems pointless, even more so when the government subsidies run out. kind of like the soy diesel. i do beleive soy- diesel ( as an additive ) not as a straight fuel. makes sense , to help add back the lubricity of the product after most of the sulfur is taken out.
There are pros and cons to everything. i dont run it personally.
i drive a 09 plat 4x4 - stock everything
runnin 89oct with 10-15percent ethanol, i am getting 16.5 avg true pump fillup avg.
running E85, driving as 'nice' as i can, i at most got 14. most of the time avg on screen and fillup was 13 real world..
and i did not invest in any of tha plants here in the area. So for me ,, not worth it in the least.
I did run 3 tanks full ( thats a little less than 108 gallons, having a 36gal tank not running to E )
Here is what i found.
*MPG sinks.
*Cost savings is not that much, and is wiped out when you figure out what your MPG goes down too.
*power gains are not noticable
I believe ethanol is a good additive in fuel. but is not a very good 'fuel' alternative. Besides all of the water and power used to make it , seems pointless, even more so when the government subsidies run out. kind of like the soy diesel. i do beleive soy- diesel ( as an additive ) not as a straight fuel. makes sense , to help add back the lubricity of the product after most of the sulfur is taken out.
There are pros and cons to everything. i dont run it personally.
i drive a 09 plat 4x4 - stock everything
runnin 89oct with 10-15percent ethanol, i am getting 16.5 avg true pump fillup avg.
running E85, driving as 'nice' as i can, i at most got 14. most of the time avg on screen and fillup was 13 real world..
and i did not invest in any of tha plants here in the area. So for me ,, not worth it in the least.
#9
#10
#11
E85 is 85% ethanol and 15% unleaded gasoline.
It's pretty hard to find guaranteed 100% gasoline today. Most pumps state that the fuel could contain up to 10% ethanol.
I'm sure an % of ethanol is going to decrease MPG (compared to 100% gasoline), but I don't have any numbers.
#12
I ran hundreds of gallons of E85 and never had any issues on my Chevy. Drove 120,000 and probably half or more was with E85. Never an issue. I lost mileage like everyone else did, but around here I could find it for 40 to 50 cents less, and I figured I was breaking even. However, I did like the performance over 87 octane. E-85 is 105 octane rating, so your computer will bump the timing up some, and gives the engine more snap without pinging. The chevy felt more responsive when I ran consecutive tanks of E85. and the exhaust smelled sweet.
I don't think it is the answer or replacement for fossil fuel, because it takes to much energy to make it. If they can figure out a different way to make it, then maybe, but there is no way we can grow enough corn for that and to eat at the same time.
I don't think it is the answer or replacement for fossil fuel, because it takes to much energy to make it. If they can figure out a different way to make it, then maybe, but there is no way we can grow enough corn for that and to eat at the same time.