Towing: EcoBoost VS Hemi VS Chevy
#47
Can you elaborate a bit? Why was the 6.2 awesome compared to the EB? I'm not doubting your statement seeing as you've driven both and I've driven neither, I am just curious as to your experiences.
#48
Since you didn't get to tow with the EB what are you basing your statement on? It's sure not the acceleration advantage of the 6.2 as there was none. Is it the big V-8 sound? Or the estimated 12/17 mpg ratings of the 6.2.
#50
#51
They didn't have a 6.2 for towing, so I can't comment on that. But yes, the acceleration of the 6.2 was better than the EB. It had a much different power band, just as the 5.0 did. The EB was boring to me. Yes, the torque is there almost immediately, but that was it. So, combining the accleratiion, sound and overall feel of the 6.2, I would choose the 6.2 unless I was doing a ton of towing (gas mileage). Overall, I like the 5.0. But ,if I were ever to get rid of my Mustang and not have it to hot rod around in, the 6.2 in a truck would be my choice.
#52
There is no replacement for the sound of a V8. Even the "little" 4.6 sounds pretty sweet, particularly in the upper RPM range. As much as I keep telling myself how good what I have is, I am contantly obsessed with gas mileage and I admittedly bought the wrong vehicle to achieve great fuel mileage. The EB just seems like the Holy Grail of pick-up engines provided it proves reliable and people can get beyond its lack of sound...
...or you could just get one of these:
http://www.soundracer.se/
#56
I doubt it will happen. Fuel economy is the goal of the new market, not large displacement gas-guzzlers. The reason for the TT V6 was for V8 power with better efficiency/fuel economy.
#57