2009 - 2014 F-150

My EcoBoost Test Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-02-2010 | 11:11 AM
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,725
Likes: 37
From: Concord, NC
Hmmm maybe a 5.0, I still wants duals
 
  #17  
Old 12-02-2010 | 12:11 PM
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
?

Originally Posted by risupercrewman
My 2007 SuperCrew XLT 5.4 3v will be payed off this comming year! According to KBB its worth $19,975! I would really like to trade it for one of these...however more truck payments?.....decisions!!!.....(LOL)
problem solved- pay cash for it
 
  #18  
Old 12-02-2010 | 07:59 PM
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,310
Likes: 778
From: Joplin MO
I betcha the 3.7 in a 2wd standard cab would give a 5.4 Screw 4x4 a good run for its money........

Ford thinks enough of the 3.7 to put it in a 2wd Screw.
 
  #19  
Old 12-02-2010 | 08:50 PM
dfiore616's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
2stroked, thanks so much for posting your Ecoboost test drive. My 05 4x4 Lariat Supercab is paid off and I was planning on buying a new Victory cross country m/c next year but, the new Ford F150 engine choices are making this decision really difficult! I need to test drive the EB, 5.0 and 6.2 F150's to find out if a new 4 wheeler is in my future.
 
  #20  
Old 12-02-2010 | 09:42 PM
2stroked's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,248
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY, USA
Originally Posted by dfiore616
2stroked, thanks so much for posting your Ecoboost test drive. My 05 4x4 Lariat Supercab is paid off and I was planning on buying a new Victory cross country m/c next year but, the new Ford F150 engine choices are making this decision really difficult! I need to test drive the EB, 5.0 and 6.2 F150's to find out if a new 4 wheeler is in my future.
I had a 2005 too. My 2010 is light years ahead of it. Drop the EcoBoost in it and you have another great leap. Drive it and believe!
 
  #21  
Old 12-03-2010 | 11:31 PM
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Texas
Look at that 5.0 pull.
 
  #22  
Old 12-04-2010 | 12:14 AM
5point4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by racer114
Look at that 5.0 pull.
Where is that at
 
  #23  
Old 12-04-2010 | 12:23 AM
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,312
Likes: 136
From: DFW
great review
 
  #24  
Old 12-04-2010 | 12:24 AM
88rxn/a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: ludlow,PA
Originally Posted by Vigs07R
It is fast but it appears the 5.0 is still better, Tan-5.0, blue-EB

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyQ2W...eature=related
maybe if they ran a couple of times. the 5.0 got the jump on him...
still, i never thought i would trade in my 04, but that ecoboost looks amazing!
 
  #25  
Old 12-04-2010 | 01:07 AM
bluegreenf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Vigs07R
It is fast but it appears the 5.0 is still better, Tan-5.0, blue-EB

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyQ2W...eature=related
The blue truck is not an EcoBoost. It is actually the 3.7 V6.
 
  #26  
Old 12-04-2010 | 01:59 AM
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
good to hear dude. I got a foot of snow the day my test drive was scheduled on so it never happened. Not really making me feel much better the dude called me that night, when I expected he would tell me he couldnt make it cause of the weather, he told me he actually forgot about me on the appointment list .
 
  #27  
Old 12-04-2010 | 06:59 PM
Excaliber551's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bluegreenf150
The blue truck is not an EcoBoost. It is actually the 3.7 V6.
I thought something was wrong there. From every test I've seen the Ecoboost isfaster than the 5.0.

I guess it depends on the driver though.
 
  #28  
Old 12-04-2010 | 07:22 PM
5point4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
If you do the 0-50 times in all the trucks the 5.0 is a little faster than the ecoboost. Ecoboost has an amazing launch but the 5.0 does so well at full throttle...now pulling, ecoboost will kill the 5.0 as well as in town drivability.
 
  #29  
Old 12-04-2010 | 07:23 PM
5point4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
I just watched to videos and timed it myself 0-50
 
  #30  
Old 12-07-2010 | 11:01 PM
Mo Power's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Ecoboost Test Drive:

I had the opportunity to drive the F150 Ecoboost today and I have to say that the performance was reasonable for a truck, but not impressive (at least in a Supercrew). It moved the truck well for a 3.5 V6. Under full acceleration, the Ecoboost engine did not push me back in the seat. I was expecting more force since Ford is really talking up the torque numbers.

I couldn't hear the turbos when I mashed on the gas, but you could slightly hear them spool up when you gently accelerate the truck. There was a slight delay when I stomped on it. The intercooler for the turbos is located right behind the front bumper. I don't like it's location because I can see it getting snow, mud, etc in there.

If you are looking to get a Supercrew model with a 4x4 transmission, it would be wise to try the 5.0 as well.

I'll be test driving a 5.0 this Saturday and will post my thoughts on this engine as well.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.