2009 - 2014 F-150

V6 EB vs V8 Ram vs V8 Chevy towing uphill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-12-2010, 03:57 AM
Rambo's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V6 EB vs V8 Ram vs V8 Chevy towing uphill

Here's the latest torture test at the Davis Dam....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W_bbzRLdDM

link: http://www.youtube.com/user/fordtruc.../6/-W_bbzRLdDM
 
  #2  
Old 12-12-2010, 06:29 AM
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to see the 5.0 Coyote run up against the Ram and Chevy.
 
  #3  
Old 12-12-2010, 07:45 AM
DarkShadowSTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brecksville, Ohio
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
43 seconds faster than the Silverado!
My next truck will definitely be an Ecoboost.
 
  #4  
Old 12-12-2010, 08:48 AM
99and04f150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: College Station , TX
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 2014 or 2015 will most likely have an Eco-Boost....... Still not 100 percent behind the ecoboost, but once it shows its quality and durability (it will). Then I will be sold.....
 
  #5  
Old 12-12-2010, 09:19 AM
gregsf150stx's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure I'd pay an extra $1,750 for an ECOBOOST engine
BASED STRICTLY OFF THE RESULTS OF THAT VIDEO!
 
  #6  
Old 12-12-2010, 10:25 AM
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregsf150stx
I am not sure I'd pay an extra $1,750 for an ECOBOOST engine
BASED STRICTLY OFF THE RESULTS OF THAT VIDEO!
Where'd you get that figure? I think it's $750.
 
  #7  
Old 12-12-2010, 11:05 AM
Greg Matty's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jus Cruisin
I'd like to see the 5.0 Coyote run up against the Ram and Chevy.
That will be the deal maker for me.

As impressive as the 0-60 time was, that is really irrelevant to me. I don't really care how quickly I get up to speed, I care about maintaining that uphill. The 3.2 second margin of victory after a 3.5 run doesn't really amount to much of an advantage for me either.

Still it is awesome to see Ford do this with a 3.5 liter V6. Now let's get those formal fuel economy numbers.

I am still trying to decide between a 5.0 Ford and a 5.7 Dodge. I have a great Ford dealer that is easy to work with and that weighs heavily in Ford's favor.


Greg
 

Last edited by Greg Matty; 12-12-2010 at 11:20 PM.
  #8  
Old 12-12-2010, 12:42 PM
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Greg Matty
That will be the deal maker for me.



I am still trying to decide between a 5.0 Ford and a 5.7 Dodge. I have a great Ford dealer that is easy to work with and that weighs heavily in Ford's favor.


Greg
I've had 2 Rams both with the hemis the first one didn't have the MDS (or whatever the thing is called to drop cylinders at cruise) and performed pretty good - 17ish hwy mpg. The second one with MDS was bad. Lucky to get 14 hwy mpg and didn't perform worth a hoot. Both interiors were barely acceptable. Poor fit & finish. I think the latest version Ram has a lot nicer interior but still has MDS (I think). No more Rams for me.
 
  #9  
Old 12-12-2010, 01:08 PM
88rxn/a's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ludlow,PA
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this thing just keeps going!
i think my next truck will have the ecoboost. assuming i can get 25MPG on NORMAL driving.
if it can only do 20 than im going to be hesitant. imagine what the programmers (SCT and so on) are going to do to this motor! these motors are going to be able to make some serious power!
 
  #10  
Old 12-12-2010, 01:42 PM
gregsf150stx's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smokewagun
Where'd you get that figure? I think it's $750.


An executive at Ford told the Detroit Free Press today that the EcoBoost V-6 will be a $1750 option

Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/6690050/au...#ixzz17vLveIb9


According to the Free Press, Lapine said that the 365-horsepower twin-turbo 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 engine and its 420 pound-feet of twist will be priced $1750 above the entry-level engine, a naturally aspirated 3.7-liter V-6. According to Ford's website, the base 2011 F-150 XL will start at $23,390 after delivery charges, so assuming the EcoBoost engine is available with all trim levels and all cab and body configurations, the starting price would come out to just $25,140.



Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/6690050/au...#ixzz17vNUa09u
 
  #11  
Old 12-12-2010, 02:17 PM
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smokewagun
Where'd you get that figure? I think it's $750.
It is $750 over the 5.0 which is a $1000 option over the standard 3.7 V6, making the Ecoboost a $1750 option total.
 
  #12  
Old 12-12-2010, 02:39 PM
Greg Matty's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jus Cruisin
I've had 2 Rams both with the hemis the first one didn't have the MDS (or whatever the thing is called to drop cylinders at cruise) and performed pretty good - 17ish hwy mpg. The second one with MDS was bad. Lucky to get 14 hwy mpg and didn't perform worth a hoot. Both interiors were barely acceptable. Poor fit & finish. I think the latest version Ram has a lot nicer interior but still has MDS (I think). No more Rams for me.
So you got worse mileage with the MDS function? I think it can be turned off but that remains to be seen. Also, Dodge does not have Ford's reputation for reliability. Also, also, the Ford 6 speed has much nicer gear choices for highway running.

Ford if you are watching please publish a torque curve for the new 5.0 . . .

Greg
 
  #13  
Old 12-12-2010, 02:46 PM
bluegreenf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
STX does not have EB so STX buyers won't have to worry about the cost of EcoBoost.

If I'm buying a FX4, CC XLT 4x4, Lariat, KR, Platinum I do not have the choice of the entry level V6. So the choice will be do you go with the standard 5.0 or add EcoBoost for $750.? Adding EcoBoost will be a no brainer to me. $750 is nothing. You'll make that back in gas savings.
 
  #14  
Old 12-12-2010, 03:48 PM
Dunesgirl's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bluegreenf150
STX does not have EB so STX buyers won't have to worry about the cost of EcoBoost.

If I'm buying a FX4, CC XLT 4x4, Lariat, KR, Platinum I do not have the choice of the entry level V6. So the choice will be do you go with the standard 5.0 or add EcoBoost for $750.? Adding EcoBoost will be a no brainer to me. $750 is nothing. You'll make that back in gas savings.
Where did you hear that the STX will not be available with the EB?

AFAIK, every trim level (save for the Lariat Limited, Harley Davidson, and Raptor) will have an EB option; as well as every configuration except for a regular cab shortbed.
 
  #15  
Old 12-12-2010, 05:05 PM
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dunesgirl
Where did you hear that the STX will not be available with the EB?
If you go to the Ford F150 web site, then compare models like the XL and STX you will see that the EB is available on the XL but not the STX. It's a shame because I'd like an STX with the EB engine.
 


Quick Reply: V6 EB vs V8 Ram vs V8 Chevy towing uphill



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.