2009 - 2014 F-150

2011 F-150 4x4 EcoBoost MPG 15 City 21 Highway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #166  
Old 01-08-2011, 03:27 PM
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Crestview, FL
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by °°Pat°°
Ding ding ding, we have a winner.
not really...all we have is speculation until guys get them out on the street and provide some real world feedback. It sounds like some guys here want the Ecoboost to be a flop. But with CAFE and those government MPG standards coming in the near future, you guys should just accept the technology. It will only get better as Ford tweaks it and makes it better over the next few years.
 
  #167  
Old 01-08-2011, 03:33 PM
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ok, I can see your point there to some extent but I doubt the difference in range will be very drastic between the EB and the 5.0.

If the mileage is cut in half on both motors the EB will get 10.5 and the 5.0 will get 9.5. This give the 5.0 69 miles more range. However, I doubt those numbers. The EB makes its power much lower than the 5.0 so that motor will need to be pushed harder to pull the same amount of weight upping the fuel usage. Since Ford does not publish fuel usage at max throttle it is really all a guess. I would be willing to bet there was a good reason they stuck with the smaller tank on the EB. Too bad that reason will probably never leave the Ford Engineering department.
 
  #168  
Old 01-08-2011, 04:26 PM
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: north Texas
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wookie
Ok, I can see your point there to some extent but I doubt the difference in range will be very drastic between the EB and the 5.0.

If the mileage is cut in half on both motors the EB will get 10.5 and the 5.0 will get 9.5. This give the 5.0 69 miles more range. However, I doubt those numbers. The EB makes its power much lower than the 5.0 so that motor will need to be pushed harder to pull the same amount of weight upping the fuel usage. Since Ford does not publish fuel usage at max throttle it is really all a guess. I would be willing to bet there was a good reason they stuck with the smaller tank on the EB. Too bad that reason will probably never leave the Ford Engineering department.

A Ford engineer stated that the ecoboost would get within 1 mpg of a V8 while towing- but he didn't say which way up or down
 
  #169  
Old 01-08-2011, 04:29 PM
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: north Texas
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor05121
Awesome!

Anyone know when the EB will be available for build & pricing on Ford's website?
By best guess is jan 15th when they tear down the ecoboost for public inspection at the auto show
 
  #170  
Old 01-08-2011, 06:32 PM
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Home of Crown Royal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Wookie;4452554]Ok, I can see your point there to some extent but I doubt the difference in range will be very drastic between the EB and the 5.0.

If the mileage is cut in half on both motors the EB will get 10.5 and the 5.0 will get 9.5. This give the 5.0 69 miles more range. However, I doubt those numbers. The EB makes its power much lower than the 5.0 so that motor will need to be pushed harder to pull the same amount of weight upping the fuel usage. Since Ford does not publish fuel usage at max throttle it is really all a guess. I would be willing to bet there was a good reason they stuck with the smaller tank on the EB. Too bad that reason will probably never leave the Ford Engineering department.[/QUOTE]

So true. And true for many things.

We won't really know if the heavier rear end and bearings are true either until we can digest the part#s to see if anything changed.

And the reason why they have now offered 4.10s on FX4 max tow w/20's.

We need a better source in the Ford truck dept.
 
  #171  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:48 PM
TX Chris's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1depd
Ford has said over and over they wanted the eco to be the top seller.
Actually, Ford has said that they expect the 5.0 to outsell the other three engines combined... in several articles and press releases.
 
  #172  
Old 01-09-2011, 12:29 AM
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wookie
Can someone explain this line of thinking?

26 gal tank x 21MPG = 546 miles

546 miles / 70MPH = 7.8 hours

How big is your bladder to be able to drive for nearly 8 hours straight? I have done my fair share of road trips and could never dream of 8 hours non-stop. Do you want kidney stones?

I was hoping for 23-24 MPG but can live with 21. Compared to my 2005 with the 5.4 it is no contest. In that truck I have gotten 20MPG once, driving on flat ground going 60MPH drafting a RV in normal driving I get 15-16. If the EB can give me 5-6 more MPG without drafting a house plus +60HP/+60Tq I will be one happy camper.
i dont get it.

you can't **** on the side of the road?
 
  #173  
Old 01-09-2011, 01:55 AM
bluegreenf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by snopro31
i dont get it.

you can't **** on the side of the road?
You can, but you risk getting arrested.
 
  #174  
Old 01-09-2011, 02:38 AM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,277
Received 773 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
A Ford engineer stated that the ecoboost would get within 1 mpg of a V8 while towing- but he didn't say which way up or down
Betcha he didn't say which V8 either. I'd bet that even the 6.2 will get similar mileage to the 5.0 and EB towing a big trailer.
 
  #175  
Old 01-09-2011, 11:35 AM
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Home of Crown Royal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When your getting 6-8 they are all "close". Although not on a percentage basis.
 
  #176  
Old 01-09-2011, 11:58 AM
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: north Texas
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by glc
Betcha he didn't say which V8 either. I'd bet that even the 6.2 will get similar mileage to the 5.0 and EB towing a big trailer.
Doesn't really matter does it? If I can get way better than the 6.2 with my ecoboost unloaded, and tie it or be close while towing, I come out way ahead and will be one happy camper
 
  #177  
Old 01-09-2011, 03:19 PM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,277
Received 773 Likes on 714 Posts
Very true! The only reason I brought up towing mileage was in reference to the gas tank size.
 
  #178  
Old 01-09-2011, 03:25 PM
kwb2004's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But the thing is that 10 more gallons of gas are only 61 lbs. I wish they would allow the 36 gallon tank.

Kevin
 
  #179  
Old 01-09-2011, 08:38 PM
broncoski's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happens when when I slap on some bigger tires. At highway speeds, will the extra grunt required to spin the tires cause more boost than normal? I'm thinking I wouldn't gain much more mpg than I get now.
 
  #180  
Old 01-09-2011, 10:23 PM
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Home of Crown Royal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get a FX4 max tow with 20s which allows 4.10s.
 


Quick Reply: 2011 F-150 4x4 EcoBoost MPG 15 City 21 Highway



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.