Just read some info on the Ecoboost that is Concerning
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am sure that it is like anything else. It will last as long as how you treat it. I am sure if you are out drag racing the Eco boost everyday or heavy towing everyday, you are going to have to replace the turbos. Same thing with the 6.2 or any other engine. I am sure the average guy that takes care of the truck and does not whip the hell out of it, things are going to last longer than expected.
But according to all the Ecoboost torture test, the turbo's seemed to take a beatin and still work just fine? This engine like anything else is going to get better through time and testing. I am going to wait, I want to see more HP and better Mpg's, it is almost a giving that this engine will be much improved in 3 years!!
But according to all the Ecoboost torture test, the turbo's seemed to take a beatin and still work just fine? This engine like anything else is going to get better through time and testing. I am going to wait, I want to see more HP and better Mpg's, it is almost a giving that this engine will be much improved in 3 years!!
#33
Wow, after 150,000 miles or 10 years, you'll have to replace the twin turbos!! That's a lot of money that will really depreciate this vehicle. I would had thought they at least, last as long as the engine. This alone now, would make me think twice about the Ecoboost. Real bummer as that was the best tow engine. Now I am glad that I got the 2010 5.4L although I really would had liked an Ecoboost.
Read the Wikipedia statement here.
Read the Wikipedia statement here.
#34
#35
yup.... thats why inframe kits dont include turbos. we rebuild engines before replacing turbos. only times turbos are replaced is due to lack of maintenance. our highest mileage KW has a kitty kat in it with over 240k on the original build with the original turbo in it. full PM done evey 6k. and it will still move 105k lbs down the road no problem.
#37
#39
Ever stopped to think that a whole herd of people had to buy the original years of the old 5.4 before it was 'proven worthy'. What if no one bought it? We'd still be driving the old 5.0 and 5.8 pushrod motors, guzzling fuel and under-performing all the while.
#40
The 5.0 has been around for almost a year and its design has been around for over 10 years now.
The Ecoboost has been around for a little over 2 years.
Ford has modular motors down pat and their quality/reliability ratings are up considerably in the last 2-3 years.
I wouldn't fear the new engines.
#41
That makes perfect sense. No one buy a 2011. All auto manufacturers should stop making technological advances and expecting us consumers to be their guinnea pigs.
Ever stopped to think that a whole herd of people had to buy the original years of the old 5.4 before it was 'proven worthy'. What if no one bought it? We'd still be driving the old 5.0 and 5.8 pushrod motors, guzzling fuel and under-performing all the while.
Ever stopped to think that a whole herd of people had to buy the original years of the old 5.4 before it was 'proven worthy'. What if no one bought it? We'd still be driving the old 5.0 and 5.8 pushrod motors, guzzling fuel and under-performing all the while.
Scratch that they were new once, make it a Model T instead.
Wait, it was a new thing too, give me back my horse and buggy.
Well crap, who can trust those new fangled wheel things.
I'll just stick to my bare feet, there's nothing new with that!
#44
#45
Yeah, the 5.4 has been around for too long- that's the problem. Now for the first time in YEARS, Ford has the best engine lineup