2009 - 2014 F-150

EcoBoost Mileage Better with Premium?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 04-28-2011, 03:21 PM
OldSkoolMC's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fordmantpw
For most vehicles, that is true. For the EB (and many newer Ford engines), that is false. If an engine is tuned to check for the octane level and adjust timing due to the different octane level, it is possible to get more HP and better MPG if running higher octane gasoline.

I don't know if Ford has released these numbers for the F150, but I think the SHO makes 10-15 more HP and torque on 93 vs. 87.
BS - Point me to the part number for the sensor that checks octane levels.

The ECU does a knock check. If there is no detonation it's not going to pull timing. It's called a knock sensor.

Higher octane = no gain.

The only thing that will provide more power would be to add boost.
 
  #32  
Old 04-28-2011, 03:27 PM
Langford's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: La Salle, MI
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor05121
How many miles are on your truck? The 4WD is hurting. As is the 4.10 gears (3.55 would be best) and the 33" tires arent helping at all.

for testing purposes, OP need to keep it at the same station (preferably the same pump) and run 2-3 tanks of 87 and 2-3 tanks of 93 to get more accurate results.
Right around 600 miles on the truck currently...from what I have read, it will improve over time, but I'm not holding my breath. I didn't buy this truck for mileage, it was a big improvement over my '10 Lariat with the 5.4 as far as power and towing capability goes, so I am happy.


Originally Posted by CliffyW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langford
I'm jealous...I can't get better than 13-14mpg on the highway with my ecoboost at 70mph. 4x4 crew cab, 4.10 gears on 33" MT's...so far from the best setup for mileage, but not near what I expected.





Get your whole rig recalibrated. Your truck's computer is set up for standard dia tires.. Plus the additional tire's contact patch equates to friction and those 4.10 gears ain't helping. You are getting 6.2 Raptor mileage
I need to get the computer reflashed for larger tires so I don't have to constantly do the math in my head for speed and MPG, but it isn't that big of a deal. As for the mileage vs the 6.2, they are similar...but the 6.2 doesn't pull near as hard, so I'm very happy with the ecoboost in that department. My brother has an '11 Limited with the 6.2, and he is getting 12-13 mpg...and when we race, I can pull 2-3 lengths on him from a stop and hold it until the speed limiter kills it.
 
  #33  
Old 04-28-2011, 04:42 PM
KingRanch979's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
BS - Point me to the part number for the sensor that checks octane levels.

The ECU does a knock check. If there is no detonation it's not going to pull timing. It's called a knock sensor.

Higher octane = no gain.

The only thing that will provide more power would be to add boost.
You're right, there isnt a sensor that specifically checks the octane rating of the fuel, but rather a detonation sensor. The F150 EcoBoost has twin independently variable camshaft timing and direct injection, which allows for very precise adjustments to optimize combustion. As you said, higher octane means slower burn time. Slower burn time means more controlled detonation, and that is the point, really. When the air intake, fuel delivery, detonation, and exhaust are all optimized and timed right, you get the highest power, thus, the highest efficiency. A lower octane fuel, such as 85 or below, may detonate before the intake valves are completely closed or before the piston has reached the top, resulting in less efficient combustion, which would yield less power.


If that didn't convince you, then maybe Ford engineers will. Here is a statement right out of the manual:

3.5L V6 EcoBoost™ engine
Your vehicle is designed to run on regular fuel with an octane rating of
87 or higher. For best overall performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. The performance gained by using premium fuel will be most noticeable in hot weather or in severe duty applications such as towing a trailer.

 
  #34  
Old 04-28-2011, 05:03 PM
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Linn, MO
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
BS - Point me to the part number for the sensor that checks octane levels.

The ECU does a knock check. If there is no detonation it's not going to pull timing. It's called a knock sensor.

Higher octane = no gain.

The only thing that will provide more power would be to add boost.
I didn't say there was a sensor to check for octane levels, I said it is tuned to check for octane levels. Yes, it is most likely done with a knock sensor. My guess is that the PCM can determine the octane rating pretty closely based on the knock sensor(s), but for all I know, there may be a way to measure octane dynamically.

The same concept allowed the '09-'10 models to get an extra 10HP and 25 lb-ft of torque on E85.

Now, if you would kindly remove your foot from your mouth so that you can eat your crow, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
 
  #35  
Old 04-28-2011, 05:25 PM
OldSkoolMC's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I said in my first post.

IF THERE IS NO DETONATION WITH 87 THERE WILL BE NO GAIN FROM ANY HIGHER OCTANE.

Meaning if the engine is running with full timing and not pulling any.... NO GAINS.

And to the manual comments...

"The performance gained by using premium fuel will be most noticeable in hot weather or in severe duty applications such as towing a trailer."

Meaning that it might pull timing while HOT or Towing running 87 octane. Key word being MIGHT. Not normal every day driving.

You guys are kidding yourself if you think you're going to gain anything from higher than 87 octane.
 
  #36  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:40 PM
KingRanch979's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
As I said in my first post.

IF THERE IS NO DETONATION WITH 87 THERE WILL BE NO GAIN FROM ANY HIGHER OCTANE.

Meaning if the engine is running with full timing and not pulling any.... NO GAINS.

And to the manual comments...

"The performance gained by using premium fuel will be most noticeable in hot weather or in severe duty applications such as towing a trailer."

Meaning that it might pull timing while HOT or Towing running 87 octane. Key word being MIGHT. Not normal every day driving.

You guys are kidding yourself if you think you're going to gain anything from higher than 87 octane.
Hence the experiment...if there is no difference in fuel economy, i'm out 7-8 bucks, if there is, cool. I suspect some gains since it is already hitting 100 degrees here in south texas.

The manual says most noticeable in hot weather and towing...that doesnt mean that in normal driving conditions there wont be any performance increase, it means that they will simply be less noticeable. Your arguement is fallacious by denying the antecedent.
 
  #37  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:51 PM
OldSkoolMC's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe what you want. I've tuned plenty of cars/trucks/bikes with turbos and superchargers and know all about how to make HP. I can tell you without a doubt adding higher octane to a factory stock tune isn't going to do anything but burn a hole in your pocket.

If you want to prove me wrong take it to the dyno and show me the difference.
 
  #38  
Old 04-28-2011, 07:09 PM
expy03's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas in the heart
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
Believe what you want. I've tuned plenty of cars/trucks/bikes with turbos and superchargers and know all about how to make HP. I can tell you without a doubt adding higher octane to a factory stock tune isn't going to do anything but burn a hole in your pocket.

If you want to prove me wrong take it to the dyno and show me the difference.
Could it be possible that the ecoboost is tuned for 91 octane, and the PCM is "pulling timing" to allow the 87 octane?
 
  #39  
Old 04-28-2011, 07:24 PM
KingRanch979's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
Believe what you want. I've tuned plenty of cars/trucks/bikes with turbos and superchargers and know all about how to make HP. I can tell you without a doubt adding higher octane to a factory stock tune isn't going to do anything but burn a hole in your pocket.

If you want to prove me wrong take it to the dyno and show me the difference.
8 bucks a tank aint going to burn a hole in my pocket

And, Expy03 makes a good point, it is possible that the the engine is tuned for 91 octane and is being timed back.
 
  #40  
Old 04-28-2011, 07:34 PM
expy03's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas in the heart
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Took me a bit, but I found the link. The Ford Engineer stated that the new 6.2 will see a power improvement with the use of higher octane. So if the 6.2 has the ability, then it makes since why the ecoboost would also.

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/92...ml#post8833938
 
  #41  
Old 04-28-2011, 10:28 PM
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Home of Crown Royal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ 460 ft lbs/TQ on premium, or so the story goes from a Ford source...
 
  #42  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:16 AM
Blue07STX's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For what it's worth, the 2011 Mustang sales pamphlet mentions that fuel mileage ratings were calculated using 91 octane fuel. My son is running 87 octane Conoco in his '11 3.7L V6 and has a best of 35 mpg highway with cruise set at 70 mph. That's above the 31 mpg it's rated at.

I run 93 octane Shell in the summer month's in my '94 Gen. 1 Lightning and 89 octane in the winter month's. It will pre detonate if I run 87 octane. It is mostly stock with timing set at factory spec's.
 
  #43  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:07 AM
APT's Avatar
APT
APT is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 5,358
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
I've tuned plenty of cars/trucks/bikes with turbos and superchargers and know all about how to make HP.
Have you written software for a 32-bit processor that calculates optimal spark timing every 5 milliseconds? Every engine today uses the knock sensor to determine under the current conditions (temp, humidity, altitude).

Fact: Higher octane means the park can be advanced more which provides more power.

If you don't need the power, then you gain efficiency by using a lower percentage of available power.

That said, 500 or 1000 miles is too low to learn much as the this engine processor (and trans too) are fine tuning the fuel and spark maps as the engine mechanical parts break in. It seems to take about 5k miles for today's engines to get to optimal power and fuel economy.
 
  #44  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:52 AM
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Linn, MO
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
Believe what you want. I've tuned plenty of cars/trucks/bikes with turbos and superchargers and know all about how to make HP. I can tell you without a doubt adding higher octane to a factory stock tune isn't going to do anything but burn a hole in your pocket.

If you want to prove me wrong take it to the dyno and show me the difference.
I will believe Ford over you, as I would guess they know their engines better than a shadetree tuner. How many '11 F150's have you tuned to know all of this about them again?

The point is, the new factory tunes from Ford are optimized to take advantage of higher octane fuel if it is present. If it is not present, it will run fine on '87, just with less power, and potentially less fuel economy.
 
  #45  
Old 04-29-2011, 11:50 AM
KingRanch979's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fordmantpw
I will believe Ford over you, as I would guess they know their engines better than a shadetree tuner. How many '11 F150's have you tuned to know all of this about them again?

The point is, the new factory tunes from Ford are optimized to take advantage of higher octane fuel if it is present. If it is not present, it will run fine on '87, just with less power, and potentially less fuel economy.
YA
 


Quick Reply: EcoBoost Mileage Better with Premium?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.