2009 - 2014 F-150

You tube vids 6.2 versus EB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-14-2011, 05:20 PM
pgh_medic's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool vids.

That 6.2 sounds amazing!!!!

Always good to see the EB hold its ground, im very pleased with mine.

On a side note, I hate the 3 beeps and then go. The guy beeping the horn has a clear advantage and the 3rd beep always comes faster than the first 2.
 
  #17  
Old 09-14-2011, 07:26 PM
Captain Awesome's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Red Deer Ab.
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OldSkoolMC
Exactly, look at all the guys who ride Harleys that think they are on rocket ships.
Lol thats exactly what i was thinking when i read that.
 
  #18  
Old 09-14-2011, 11:20 PM
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh boy! There ain't no replacement for... Yeah, right. I know drag racing isn't what trucks are all about, but that all says enough. There was clearly no advantage there at all with the 6.2L - especially for the extra cost for the upgrade and the thirst. The little engine that could hung right there - no question. I'd love to see a towing run. My money would have to go to the EcoBoost. Unfortunately, I'm looking at the 6.7L and it for some reason it wont come with an F150 .
 
  #19  
Old 09-15-2011, 02:44 AM
Mark Miller's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't drove a F-150 with the 6.2 in it.But i was impressed when i raced my 2011 F-150 XLT Supercab 4X4,EcoBoost and 3.55 gears in it.It only had 700 miles on it and ran a 14.97 at 93 mph in the 1/4 mile.I might take it back to the track on the 25th of September if the weather is nice.

Later Mark.
 
  #20  
Old 09-15-2011, 09:50 AM
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Linn, MO
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Smokewagun
Oh boy! There ain't no replacement for... Yeah, right. I know drag racing isn't what trucks are all about, but that all says enough. There was clearly no advantage there at all with the 6.2L - especially for the extra cost for the upgrade and the thirst. The little engine that could hung right there - no question. I'd love to see a towing run. My money would have to go to the EcoBoost. Unfortunately, I'm looking at the 6.7L and it for some reason it wont come with an F150 .
Agreed!

The 6.7L is a sweet piece of oil-burning machinery! My dad has one, and it's quiet, tows like a dream, and gets great fuel economy...better than his flawless '03 6.0. Towing or empty, he gets 2-3 MPG (hand calculated) better than his 6.0. If you can swing a 6.7, I say go for it. I would love to have an F150 for the everyday driving comfort, but the F250 is much more stable towing our fifth wheel!
 
  #21  
Old 09-15-2011, 11:39 AM
birddog_61's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Graham TX
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One small thing I noticed is it says the eco was spooling the turbos each time but the guy in the 6.2 wasn't building any power at the line, he just stomped the gas on the third honk. I don't know how much of a difference it would have made but it for sure does make a difference to build some torque at the launch.
 
  #22  
Old 09-15-2011, 12:33 PM
6"_isnt_enough's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: latrobe, pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting vids...
 
  #23  
Old 09-15-2011, 04:49 PM
Langford's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: La Salle, MI
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I pull 2 lengths on my brothers 6.2 limited off the line with my ecoboost, and hold them until we hit the speed limiters. I'm surprised to see the two trucks being that close in those vids.
 
  #24  
Old 09-18-2011, 06:38 PM
MCS's Avatar
MCS
MCS is offline
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well great vids, but i don't no how that 6.2 is taking off without spinning the tires because my 6.2 just spins the tires and that is just getting into it real fast, if you just jam it to the floor it will spin and hit the rev limit, im not even sure the TC works
 
  #25  
Old 09-18-2011, 11:34 PM
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patman
15 psi of boost will do wonders to any engine big or small
This is about the only reply with any common sense put into it. The ecoboost is a damn fine motor but Ford built it to be more appealing then the 6.2 so why would anyone expect the 6.2 to outperform the ecoboost? Put twin turbos on the 6.2 at 15psi and build it with towing in mind and it would be absolute embarassment for the ecoboost. If I was buying any of these motors with drag racing in mind I would choose the 6.2 and 5.0 before the ecoboost as a starting point. Boost is definitely a replacement for displacement and Ford just proved it with the ecoboost motor but with all things being equal, displacement will win everytime. Sadly it has also brought out the idiocy in some people.
 
  #26  
Old 09-19-2011, 12:14 AM
LincolnMarkLT20's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for posting the link to the videos!!
 
  #27  
Old 09-19-2011, 09:40 AM
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Linn, MO
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2004Triton5.4
This is about the only reply with any common sense put into it. The ecoboost is a damn fine motor but Ford built it to be more appealing then the 6.2 so why would anyone expect the 6.2 to outperform the ecoboost? Put twin turbos on the 6.2 at 15psi and build it with towing in mind and it would be absolute embarassment for the ecoboost. If I was buying any of these motors with drag racing in mind I would choose the 6.2 and 5.0 before the ecoboost as a starting point. Boost is definitely a replacement for displacement and Ford just proved it with the ecoboost motor but with all things being equal, displacement will win everytime. Sadly it has also brought out the idiocy in some people.
Well, no ***** sherlock!

Of course, if you boost a 6.2 with 15 psi it's going to outrun a boosted 3.5. But, a boosted 6.2 isn't a stock engine now, is it? I'm pretty sure we were comparing apples to apples, and not apples to cumquats.
 
  #28  
Old 09-19-2011, 10:00 AM
blackshelby's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is some real testing on the trucks

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ull_line_test/
 
  #29  
Old 09-19-2011, 10:05 AM
Captain Awesome's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Red Deer Ab.
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blackshelby
Here is some real testing on the trucks

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ull_line_test/
Are you kidding.
 
  #30  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:50 PM
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So. Texas
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 37 Posts
I'm not sure what you guys expected with this. The 6.2 computer mapping does not allow WOT until 3800rpms. The EB doesn't have that limitation. Put a chip that allows WOT from the start in that 6.2 and it's a completely different ball game with the EB sucking lots of 6.2 exhaust. So why does the 6.2 have this? To keep the morons from destroying the drive train. Yeah, there's that much power there and an endless supply of morons.
 


Quick Reply: You tube vids 6.2 versus EB



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.