2009 - 2014 F-150

The 2011 FX4 5-liter V8 -OR- 3.5-liter V6 Ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-21-2011, 04:55 PM
iF150's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question The 2011 FX4 5-liter V8 -OR- 3.5-liter V6 Ecoboost

Hi all... I'm considering buying a F-150 FX4 and have been doing a bit of research online prior to going in for a test drive. I'd like to know if anyone has driven both models and if anyone has any opinion as to which is better than the other.

I came across several websites that list specs on both, such as:

5-liter V8 - http://www.usautochoice.com/2011-for...0-fx4-5-0l-v8/

3.5-liter V6 - http://www.usautochoice.com/2011-for...l-ecoboost-v6/

And I see that they are pretty much equally powered and priced, but I'd like to hear back from those who have actually driven one (or both of 'em).

 
  #2  
Old 09-21-2011, 05:04 PM
OldSkoolMC's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try doing a search this has been beaten to death already.
 
  #3  
Old 09-21-2011, 05:18 PM
TxAg98's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....to death.
 
  #4  
Old 09-21-2011, 06:10 PM
troutspinner's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To death but I'll bite. They are not equally priced. The Eco is a $750 option.
 
  #5  
Old 09-21-2011, 06:26 PM
DjG's Avatar
DjG
DjG is offline
Technical Article Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both are great engines, but the Eco won out for me. It just out performs the 5.0 hands down. But Ford is doing great and their engine line up is great also so I'm sure you will be pleased with either engine.
 
  #6  
Old 09-21-2011, 07:03 PM
MR STEWCREW's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sarnia, Ontario CANADA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drove both before I ordered mine with the 5.0. I have only owned one truck with a V6 and that was my '91 S10 4x4. Anyway, for me it was the sound. I have to have a V8 sound when I get on it and the 5.0 really growls in stock form....with mods, who knows? In Canada, the Eco costs more too.
 
  #7  
Old 09-21-2011, 07:47 PM
KazK's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really?

REALLY?
 
  #8  
Old 09-21-2011, 07:47 PM
Desert Dawg's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pure performance....go Eco.
Potential for better mileage....go Eco.
Need to tow heavier loads....go Eco.
Potential for higher resale....go Eco.
Want to pretend you're even slightly "green"....go Eco.

Like that V8 growl....definitely go 5.0.
Potential for mods without too much risk of blowing up your engine....go 5.0.
Need to tow moderately....go 5.0.
Want to save a few bucks initially....go 5.0.

I went for the Eco but did not immediately rule out the 5.0L by any means. Both are great engines.
 

Last edited by Desert Dawg; 09-21-2011 at 07:50 PM.
  #9  
Old 09-21-2011, 10:34 PM
nocralbdr's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Desert Dawg
Pure performance....go Eco.
Potential for better mileage....go Eco.
Need to tow heavier loads....go Eco.
Potential for higher resale....go Eco.
Want to pretend you're even slightly "green"....go Eco.

Like that V8 growl....definitely go 5.0.
Potential for mods without too much risk of blowing up your engine....go 5.0.
Need to tow moderately....go 5.0.
Want to save a few bucks initially....go 5.0.

I went for the Eco but did not immediately rule out the 5.0L by any means. Both are great engines.
I like the way you summed that up! I'm in the same boat as iF150. I've been leaning more and more towards the Eco.
 
  #10  
Old 09-22-2011, 01:39 AM
Mark Miller's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DjG
Both are great engines, but the Eco won out for me. It just out performs the 5.0 hands down. But Ford is doing great and their engine line up is great also so I'm sure you will be pleased with either engine.
X2,i drove both and the EcoBoost just flat out performs better then the 5.0 IMO.The 5.0 might sound better but i would rather have a quiet fast truck then a loud slow truck.

Later Mark.
 
  #11  
Old 09-22-2011, 09:02 AM
APT's Avatar
APT
APT is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 5,358
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great summary by Dawg. There is no way the performance is the same. Unloaded, WOT is similar. Part throttle, the EB has some quirks. But no other half ton pulls as hard as the EB from 2000rpm+, which is most noticeable when towing.
 
  #12  
Old 09-22-2011, 09:15 AM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Posts: 26,025
Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts
After doing a lot of research, I drove both expecting I would buy the EB. To me they were very close in power. There were 3 deciding factors. The EB I test drove had a turbo lag when you punched it. I might have gotten used to it, but doubt it. I do not like having to wait on anything. The EB I drove felt light on the front when changing lanes, getting on the freeway, etc, but I could have gotten used to that. Then there is the sound. I have had V8s for 54 years, my first was a flathead Ford. I just love the sound of a smooth V8. So, I could not see paying $750 extra for something that I would not be totally happy with. Since I seldom tow and when I do, it's not heavy, the only time the EB was a winner for me was when my foot was in it and how often is that? I am pleased with the 5.0 so far and I get 22.1 on the interstate at 72 mph and 19 overall. This last week's fillup, I got 19.5 overall. I have 4500 miles on it.
 
__________________
Jim
  #13  
Old 09-22-2011, 03:22 PM
birddog_61's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Graham TX
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark Miller
X2,i drove both and the EcoBoost just flat out performs better then the 5.0 IMO.The 5.0 might sound better but i would rather have a quiet fast truck then a loud slow truck.

Later Mark.
Why try and start crap? The 5.0 is by no means slow, the eco is faster in stock form but neither truck is slow.
 
  #14  
Old 09-22-2011, 06:49 PM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is online now
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,277
Received 773 Likes on 714 Posts
Of course the EB outperforms the 5.0 - it has more HP and torque. The EB is offered as an alternative to the 6.2. If it weren't for CAFE requirements and the price of gas, you think Ford would even bother with the EB? They'd offer the 6.2 across the board for all you power and sound freaks.

Even the 3.7 isn't slow. It's all in what you need and want.
 
  #15  
Old 09-22-2011, 07:15 PM
Desert Dawg's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bluejay
After doing a lot of research, I drove both expecting I would buy the EB. To me they were very close in power. There were 3 deciding factors. The EB I test drove had a turbo lag when you punched it. I might have gotten used to it, but doubt it. I do not like having to wait on anything. The EB I drove felt light on the front when changing lanes, getting on the freeway, etc, but I could have gotten used to that. Then there is the sound. I have had V8s for 54 years, my first was a flathead Ford. I just love the sound of a smooth V8. So, I could not see paying $750 extra for something that I would not be totally happy with. Since I seldom tow and when I do, it's not heavy, the only time the EB was a winner for me was when my foot was in it and how often is that? I am pleased with the 5.0 so far and I get 22.1 on the interstate at 72 mph and 19 overall. This last week's fillup, I got 19.5 overall. I have 4500 miles on it.
That's pretty good results Bluejay! I actually bought the Eco for the performance factor with the "potential" for better gas mileage as secondary. It's curious because mine did not have any noticeable lag at all. Also, the Eco's performance is more pronounced at altitude over the naturally aspirated V8s since I drive in the 5000-12000 ft. elevation range. I had my mind on a Raptor with the 6.2L and I know how I like to drive so the Eco was the way to go for me. But I also have to do a lot of stop and go commuting so having the Eco's increased potential for good mileage was also attractive. But it was hard for me to depart my past V8s and custom exhausts...nothing sounds better!
 

Last edited by Desert Dawg; 09-22-2011 at 11:24 PM.


Quick Reply: The 2011 FX4 5-liter V8 -OR- 3.5-liter V6 Ecoboost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.