2.7 Ecoboost
#1
#2
The micro eb pulled up that load without much effort. Rather remarkable. Interesting to note that if you use the 1% loss per 1000 feet for forced induction and the 3% loss per 1000 feet for naturally aspirated then the 2.7tt qnd GM 6.2 have the same horsepower at 10000 feet elevation.
Even with its impressive specs, the 2.7tt may be underated as seen on a 5 star tuning dyno. On the other hand, the 380 hp 5.3 gm is way overated as it was only getting 260 hp on the dyno
The testing at TFL is not perfect, especially since they keep changing their damn trailers, it is still possibly the best real world testing that shows how truck will handle the worst of the worst conditions.
Even with its impressive specs, the 2.7tt may be underated as seen on a 5 star tuning dyno. On the other hand, the 380 hp 5.3 gm is way overated as it was only getting 260 hp on the dyno
The testing at TFL is not perfect, especially since they keep changing their damn trailers, it is still possibly the best real world testing that shows how truck will handle the worst of the worst conditions.
#3
This is good to know. I'm looking to replace my 2011 and downsizing my truck from a crew cab to a super cab. I also don't need the 3.5l engine since I rarely tow and when I do it's light weight towing. I was looking at the 2.7l, but as with other people waiting to see any type of review and real world results. I really only need a Ranger sized truck, but Ford doesn't do that.
#5
This is good to know. I'm looking to replace my 2011 and downsizing my truck from a crew cab to a super cab. I also don't need the 3.5l engine since I rarely tow and when I do it's light weight towing. I was looking at the 2.7l, but as with other people waiting to see any type of review and real world results. I really only need a Ranger sized truck, but Ford doesn't do that.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
Impressive! I know my EcoBoost ran up I-70 with a camper attached. I didn't make that exact run but was close. I had to lift several times because other 1/2 tons with trailers were blocking the lane. It was a lot of fun to have my lil ol' V6 Ford leaving those veeee ate "man's" trucks in the dust.
Speaking of Fords, I'd do baaaad things for the Bronco they had.
Speaking of Fords, I'd do baaaad things for the Bronco they had.
#11
That doesn't surprise me a bit. It was a hard pull, and he wasn't taking it easy. I think I see something similar in my truck when I pull our 3800# trailer up long 6-7% grades at 65 mph.
I wonder how hot the transmission got? That's the thing I really notice on long uphill climbs pulling our trailer. However, the outside temperature looked pretty cool where they were, and that acts to keep the transmission a lot cooler. In Arizona, our long climbs are usually done with outside temperature in the 100-105 degree range and that kicks the TFT up to around 225. I think it's stayed below 200 when I've pulled our trailer over 11,000 ft passes in Colorado.
- Jack
I wonder how hot the transmission got? That's the thing I really notice on long uphill climbs pulling our trailer. However, the outside temperature looked pretty cool where they were, and that acts to keep the transmission a lot cooler. In Arizona, our long climbs are usually done with outside temperature in the 100-105 degree range and that kicks the TFT up to around 225. I think it's stayed below 200 when I've pulled our trailer over 11,000 ft passes in Colorado.
- Jack
#12
#13
#15