The infamous "lean" dicussion with tuners and intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-19-2009 | 01:36 PM
hoseclamp's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: central BC, Canada
The infamous "lean" dicussion with tuners and intakes

As my sig shows, garbage AFE noise/vibe intake (does make power though), Hypertech tuner on 87 octane, Magnafow, had the truck in for a service, mech grabbed his diagnostics and went for a drive to scope the air/fuel, his results, no problem. Said the ratio is safe and very linear/stable, guaranteed me no warranty issues with this setup. Just though I'd pass it on, no custom intake tune needed here.
 

Last edited by hoseclamp; 01-19-2009 at 02:26 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-19-2009 | 02:33 PM
Drkharbinger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Originally Posted by hoseclamp
As my sig shows, garbage AFE noise/vibe intake (does make power though), Hypertech tuner on 87 octane, Magnafow, had the truck in for a service, mech grabbed his diagnostics and went for a drive to scope the air/fuel, his results, no problem. Said the ratio is safe and very linear/stable, guaranteed me no warranty issues with this setup. Just though I'd pass it on, no custom intake tune needed here.
Which intake is it? The open stage 2 for the 5.4?
 
  #3  
Old 01-19-2009 | 02:45 PM
OKCIS's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: OKC, Ok
Just out of curiosity im somewhat new here and have always just heard people say oh it makes your truck run lean. Has anyone actually hooked up a wideband to their truck and drove around? Most modern ECU's if reset (disconnect battery pump brakes a few times then reconnect)when you make the changes will compensate for the changes and remap for the airflow and make the truck run normal with the A/F ratios.

My experiences come from other cars though and not trucks so personally im not knowledgeable as far as how the Ford ECU works.
 
  #4  
Old 01-19-2009 | 02:52 PM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,034
Likes: 70
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by OKCIS
Just out of curiosity im somewhat new here and have always just heard people say oh it makes your truck run lean. Has anyone actually hooked up a wideband to their truck and drove around? Most modern ECU's if reset (disconnect battery pump brakes a few times then reconnect)when you make the changes will compensate for the changes and remap for the airflow and make the truck run normal with the A/F ratios.

My experiences come from other cars though and not trucks so personally im not knowledgeable as far as how the Ford ECU works.
It's a long story that you can get by reading threads in the Tuning section. The 2004s and early 2005s came from the factory in a near lean condition. ANY additional airflow could be detrimental. This was proved out by dyno at Troyer's. The later trucks are probably ok, but I personally would not run the risk, as a custom tune is needed anyway to maximize the value of a CAI. Yes, you can do as you suggested and the PCM will make some adjustment, but, it is limited as to how much it can adjust, as Bill at PHP has explained. Again, without custom tunes, you get about half of the potential of a CAI plus just might run lean. Do some searches on the various word combos, and you will find soem threads to read.
 
__________________
Jim
  #5  
Old 01-19-2009 | 02:58 PM
OKCIS's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: OKC, Ok
I ordered a gryphon just for the simple fact that i thought well the truck has been out for awhile and surely people have done it. Honestly i based alot of my choice on choosing Bill and the gryphon based on posts made by you. You seem to always answer with a little more knowledge on it then most have done.

I just havent gotten into reading the hardcore tuning threads yet i swore to the wife that this truck would just be driven and wouldnt wind up like every other car we own and im trying to keep my word....... I figured intake, exhaust and programmer stays within the normal realms as long as i dont turbo it she probably will leave me alone lol
 
  #6  
Old 01-19-2009 | 03:08 PM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,034
Likes: 70
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by OKCIS
I ordered a gryphon just for the simple fact that i thought well the truck has been out for awhile and surely people have done it. Honestly i based alot of my choice on choosing Bill and the gryphon based on posts made by you. You seem to always answer with a little more knowledge on it then most have done.

I just havent gotten into reading the hardcore tuning threads yet i swore to the wife that this truck would just be driven and wouldnt wind up like every other car we own and im trying to keep my word....... I figured intake, exhaust and programmer stays within the normal realms as long as i dont turbo it she probably will leave me alone lol
You won't be disappointed. If I had to start giving up mods, the last would be the custom tunes from Bill. I would really hate to give up my dual exhaust as I love the music, and the tint is great. I love my wheels, but they would all go before the tunes. They make the truck, for me.
 
__________________
Jim
  #7  
Old 01-19-2009 | 03:18 PM
Drkharbinger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Originally Posted by OKCIS
Just out of curiosity im somewhat new here and have always just heard people say oh it makes your truck run lean. Has anyone actually hooked up a wideband to their truck and drove around? Most modern ECU's if reset (disconnect battery pump brakes a few times then reconnect)when you make the changes will compensate for the changes and remap for the airflow and make the truck run normal with the A/F ratios.

My experiences come from other cars though and not trucks so personally im not knowledgeable as far as how the Ford ECU works.
I have a with and w/o tune dyno. It is posted here in the tuning section.
 
  #8  
Old 01-19-2009 | 03:37 PM
i.ride.suzuki's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by OKCIS
Just out of curiosity im somewhat new here and have always just heard people say oh it makes your truck run lean. Has anyone actually hooked up a wideband to their truck and drove around?
Sure have, it's lean.

Originally Posted by OKCIS
Most modern ECU's if reset (disconnect battery pump brakes a few times then reconnect)when you make the changes will compensate for the changes and remap for the airflow and make the truck run normal with the A/F ratios.
Long term fuel trims are ALWAYS changing, clearning the KAM resets the LTFT table and you start all over. I have seen an CAI on a stock F150 with LTFT table in the +18%, ford recommends a +/-10% and most tuners recommend a +/-5%. So if OP cleared the KAM/reflashed his LTFT would be low %, but may still be changing during drive cycles.

Originally Posted by hoseclamp
As my sig shows, garbage AFE noise/vibe intake (does make power though), Hypertech tuner on 87 octane, Magnafow, had the truck in for a service, mech grabbed his diagnostics and went for a drive to scope the air/fuel, his results, no problem. Said the ratio is safe and very linear/stable, guaranteed me no warranty issues with this setup. Just though I'd pass it on, no custom intake tune needed here.
hoseclamp, MOST if not all dealer techs don't know anything about PCM tuning, i wouldn't trust any information from them.
 
  #9  
Old 01-19-2009 | 03:55 PM
ASEMechanic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
I can see we are going to go 'round & 'round on this issue. Hopefully this will settle the debate. Maybe it won't... who knows?

This dyno plot was made on a 2004 F150, both before and after installing an AFE CAI kit. The runs were about 50 minutes apart, which was the time it took me to install the CAI. All test conditions were the same and the engine was at full operating temperature (both ECT and EOT) when making both runs. Take it for what it's worth.

(click for larger image)


Unfortunately, the sampling software didn't correctly log the AFR from the meter but fortunately we did make a note of the AFR for each WOT run because as soon as I saw the results, I was on the phone with AFE.

Stock w/o CAI- 14.4 AFR (+/- .1)
Stock w/AFE - 15.6 AFR (+/- .1)

When I contacted AFE about this issue, I was basically told I didn't know what I was doing and I was supposed to have let the PCM "relearn" the fuel curves. Now I didn't necessarily disagree with this so after running about an hour on the dyno at varying speeds, loads, and throttle positions, I did a few more runs with exactly the same results. What's even funnier is that when I put the stock airbox back on, my power curve and AFRs returned to normal... WIHTOUT having to relearn any fuel maps.

I will say that after correcting the fueling and MAF tables to compensate for the airflow offset cause by the CAI, the truck picked up about 8 HP above 3000 RPM. Oddly, it's nearly the same 8 HP we picked up at the same RPM by removing the snorkel from the fender. Go figure. Oh, and the stock airbox didn't DRONE!

Again, take it for what it's worth. In my opinion, the stock airbox on the F150 provides more than enough flow, at least for a naturally aspirated application. Supercharged or other Forced Induction applications will certainly be different and airflow requirements are dramatically changed in these applications.

Hope this helps.
 
  #10  
Old 01-19-2009 | 04:02 PM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,034
Likes: 70
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Bill, when you refer to the snorkel, is that just the short piece that connect to the hole in the inner fender?
 
__________________
Jim
  #11  
Old 01-19-2009 | 05:07 PM
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana

Originally Posted by ASEMechanic
I can see we are going to go 'round & 'round on this issue. Hopefully this will settle the debate. Maybe it won't... who knows?

This dyno plot was made on a 2004 F150, both before and after installing an AFE CAI kit. The runs were about 50 minutes apart, which was the time it took me to install the CAI. All test conditions were the same and the engine was at full operating temperature (both ECT and EOT) when making both runs. Take it for what it's worth.

(click for larger image)


Unfortunately, the sampling software didn't correctly log the AFR from the meter but fortunately we did make a note of the AFR for each WOT run because as soon as I saw the results, I was on the phone with AFE.

Stock w/o CAI- 14.4 AFR (+/- .1)
Stock w/AFE - 15.6 AFR (+/- .1)

When I contacted AFE about this issue, I was basically told I didn't know what I was doing and I was supposed to have let the PCM "relearn" the fuel curves. Now I didn't necessarily disagree with this so after running about an hour on the dyno at varying speeds, loads, and throttle positions, I did a few more runs with exactly the same results. What's even funnier is that when I put the stock airbox back on, my power curve and AFRs returned to normal... WIHTOUT having to relearn any fuel maps.

I will say that after correcting the fueling and MAF tables to compensate for the airflow offset cause by the CAI, the truck picked up about 8 HP above 3000 RPM. Oddly, it's nearly the same 8 HP we picked up at the same RPM by removing the snorkel from the fender. Go figure. Oh, and the stock airbox didn't DRONE!

Again, take it for what it's worth. In my opinion, the stock airbox on the F150 provides more than enough flow, at least for a naturally aspirated application. Supercharged or other Forced Induction applications will certainly be different and airflow requirements are dramatically changed in these applications.

Hope this helps.
I have alway's wondered how could a CAI possibly flow much better than the factory airbox with the snorkel removed. I'm not saying it doesn't but I don't see it being a huge difference though.
 

Last edited by 2004Triton5.4; 01-19-2009 at 05:09 PM.
  #12  
Old 01-19-2009 | 05:08 PM
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana

Originally Posted by Bluejay
Bill, when you refer to the snorkel, is that just the short piece that connect to the hole in the inner fender?
Yes sir that's what he is talking about.
 
  #13  
Old 01-19-2009 | 10:00 PM
fitz888's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: NH
Anyone interested in a slightly used s+b intake lol.
 
  #14  
Old 01-19-2009 | 10:50 PM
Groovy Chick's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Beautiful Winder, GA
Originally Posted by fitz888
Anyone interested in a slightly used s+b intake lol.
 
  #15  
Old 01-20-2009 | 07:22 PM
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,818
Likes: 56
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by Bluejay
Bill, when you refer to the snorkel, is that just the short piece that connect to the hole in the inner fender?
Jim - He discusses this over on the PHP forum. That piece narrows the intake diameter down to about 2 inches, I think he said. Removing it gives improved airflow at higher RPMs with no lean mixture issues.

There was also a reference to the "Gotts" mod there that's in a thread on this forum. Appears to be something I'm going to have to look into.

- Jack
 


Quick Reply: The infamous "lean" dicussion with tuners and intakes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.