Fuel consumption
#1
Fuel consumption
Ever since I had a Magnaflow cat back installed on my Truck I've noticed a significant decrease in gas mileage. Techs @ flow said that this was normal untill ECU relearned free flowing exhaust pattern after driving 300 to 1000 miles, or after a reset of the ECU by removing negative wire frim batt and then allowing to idle then drive 1 complete cycle. haven driven 1000 miles plus 3 resets I have not gained any increase in gas consumption. Have any one else suffered this or similar problems with a cat back system? The exhaust was proffesionally installed and the truck only have 47.000 on the dash.
#3
#4
#5
Originally posted by RockyJSquirrel
In order to intelligently discuss your fuel mileage, you must be able to accurately compute your fuel mileage. And yes, you have a trip odometer. 'About 50 miles and burned about a quarter tank' means nothing. Are you a product of our wonderful public school system?
In order to intelligently discuss your fuel mileage, you must be able to accurately compute your fuel mileage. And yes, you have a trip odometer. 'About 50 miles and burned about a quarter tank' means nothing. Are you a product of our wonderful public school system?
Last edited by Jah_Rankin; 12-28-2004 at 01:40 PM.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
miloeage
Ive had my 04' FX4 scab for a month or so now. I have 1,600 miles on it. I installed a Magnaflow cat back si/so w/ stock 2.5 input but went with 3" output w/ stainless tip. ($320 w/ install)
I regret not doing a mileage check before installing it. On my last tank I got 12.3 MPG. This is a 20 mile commute to work and some in town driving. Moderate driving with 70-75 MPH highway speed.
Im not upset with this, however, Im not pleased either. Can I get some input on MPG.
Will this get better? When? What about when I put on an Air Force intake kit?
Stu
I regret not doing a mileage check before installing it. On my last tank I got 12.3 MPG. This is a 20 mile commute to work and some in town driving. Moderate driving with 70-75 MPH highway speed.
Im not upset with this, however, Im not pleased either. Can I get some input on MPG.
Will this get better? When? What about when I put on an Air Force intake kit?
Stu
#11
With the weight of these trucks and the low torque output in the normal running range, you have to open the throttle farther to get the power to maintain road speed.
The more the throttle is open the more fuel is metered into the engine.
Look in the rear view mirrior to see all that fuel you leave behind......doing this.
Fact of life and science.
The more the throttle is open the more fuel is metered into the engine.
Look in the rear view mirrior to see all that fuel you leave behind......doing this.
Fact of life and science.
#12
I estimate i can get about 100 miles (give or take) on a 1/4 tank under normal driving conditions, with the occasional heavy foot, mix of freeway and stoplight to stoplight miles. Which puts me at about 425 miles to the tank, give or take... which puts me in the average of about 17MPG... 14 - 15 if i get on it more often... i have a 97 4.6L
#13
Since this thread topic is fuel consumption,
a report hot off the road this evening.
4.6 Screw, 3.55 gears, total weight 5900 +/- lbs.
Conditions, 20 to 26* temps, Pocono mts. Eastern Pa. 138.6 miles round trip with some idle time and a small amount of 4wheel drive use on 8.35 gal of Gulf 87 out of the same pump. Thats 16.5 mpg in cold weather. Road speed 60 to 65 mph with partial Cruise control use on level road.
a report hot off the road this evening.
4.6 Screw, 3.55 gears, total weight 5900 +/- lbs.
Conditions, 20 to 26* temps, Pocono mts. Eastern Pa. 138.6 miles round trip with some idle time and a small amount of 4wheel drive use on 8.35 gal of Gulf 87 out of the same pump. Thats 16.5 mpg in cold weather. Road speed 60 to 65 mph with partial Cruise control use on level road.
#14
in cold weather arent you more likely to get better fuel economy? Regardless of how cold it is outside... the intake warms up the air as it makes its way down the chute... but having slightly cooler air is actually known to help out the ignition process... thus the reason for "Cold Air Induction"