FIPK vs. 77 Series

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-09-2006 | 09:54 PM
bassmaster1061's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
FIPK vs. 77 Series

What are the differences between these two and which one do yall prefer? thanks, mac
 
  #2  
Old 12-09-2006 | 10:16 PM
biker_boy_9r's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Difference.

Actually the FIPK shows more increase in HP. The supposed reasoning to that is that the FIPK is composed of a thick plastic and doesnt get as hot as the metal 77 series intake. Some go with the 77 for the looks though, guess it just depends on what your lookin for. Personally I have the Gen2 FIPK and I am very happy with it, and it doesnt look bad at all. Pics in my gallery and you can find the HP differences on K&N's website. Hope this helps.
 
  #3  
Old 12-09-2006 | 10:20 PM
bassmaster1061's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
looks nice
 
  #4  
Old 12-09-2006 | 10:22 PM
biker_boy_9r's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Thanks.
 
  #5  
Old 12-10-2006 | 11:44 AM
thetruck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by bassmaster1061
What are the differences between these two and which one do yall prefer? thanks, mac

It all depends on your preference. I like the way the 77 series looks and sounds. It sounds great at WOT. And it makes my engine compartment look shiny!
 
  #6  
Old 12-10-2006 | 08:17 PM
Fordwitflows's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: MA
I have the 77 series. I basically got it over others based on looks
 
  #7  
Old 12-10-2006 | 08:18 PM
Fordwitflows's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: MA
check gallery for pix
 



Quick Reply: FIPK vs. 77 Series



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.