true dual help
#18
I'm going against Darren (sorry man!) every MM owner loves Magnaflow, they don't sound good IMHO. I bought my car and there were Mag's on there and I couldn't stand them, they sounded stock to me. I switched out to Flow's and I was so happy. There is no "hey get out of my way" sound to them. They sound good, but not as good as Flows. Yes, a lot of people hate Flows because of their obnoxious drone's, but like you said, everyone is different. And to be honest, with my Super 44, I picked up MPG's and I my truck feels peppier down low compared to stock. I also barely have any resonance inside my cab.
#21
#22
#23
Hi-flow converters and a 14" body SI/DO with over 6,000 miles on the muffler will sound close to a stock cats SI/DO Flowmaster system.
Flowmaster does make a nice rumble, but it also sounds cheap and 'tin can' like at certain times. Here is a quick video of my old truck's exhaust with true dualed Super 44s, listen to the idle, and low rpm sound ( reverse mostly ) you will better understand what I mean by "Magnaflow sounds clearer, and Flowmaster sounds more tin can like" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvV8fosnK14
I'm not arguing with anyone, I agree with Vic, Flowmasters do sound pretty sweet though, but there are ways to make Magnaflows louder. Vic my truck is about just as loud as yours, just doesn't have the aggressive rev, which I sometimes wish I had!
Last edited by DarrenWS6; 10-30-2008 at 01:25 PM.
#25
OK, here's a question; I wonder if the people that say Flowmasters cost them power still had stock cats or aftermarket hi-flow cats? I know that a little backpressure creates bottom-end torque, I'm just wondering if the stock cats have ENOUGH backpressure to compensate for the Flowmasters...
#26
OK, here's a question; I wonder if the people that say Flowmasters cost them power still had stock cats or aftermarket hi-flow cats? I know that a little backpressure creates bottom-end torque, I'm just wondering if the stock cats have ENOUGH backpressure to compensate for the Flowmasters...