has anybody seen this mess
#16
Originally Posted by mrainey889
I agree...what the hell is up with that power rating. An 8.0 litre turbo diesel should easily be just above 400hp/800lb-ft.
That was the first thing I thought when I read it. I would've been embarrassed to put that up in SEMA. That said, I don't think the outside looks too bad; interior's pretty hideous though.
#18
Originally Posted by elmo
That was the first thing I thought when I read it. I would've been embarrassed to put that up in SEMA. That said, I don't think the outside looks too bad; interior's pretty hideous though.
Perhaps they are worried about warranty issues...
#19
#20
Originally Posted by ManualF150
Still...my opinions remain the same
Thanks ManualF150..
#21
Originally Posted by Pagnew
Just read it and the links attached...all the info I could imagine on this thing.
Still...my opinions remain the same
Thanks ManualF150..
Still...my opinions remain the same
Thanks ManualF150..
That original artical was confusing... so I knew there had to be specifications out on the web... especially if it was turbocharged or not; which it is.
My opinions still remain the same too.
#23
#24
#25
#26
that truck actually doesn't look too bad. if you can hide the rear fenders and don't open the doors. looks alot better than the goofyass crewmax 1/2 ton. god those things are ugly,the back door's like 5ft long. and even redlining at 2600 you should atleast be able to get more torque than that if not any hp. this is supposed to be a concept and the don't even go a LITTLE wild on the motor. not to mention the 5-speed manual,i say again wtf?
#28
It looks like the japs are making a characatcher (sorry for the spelling, you know those artists at the state fairs that draw exaggerated images of you) of American trucks. Hideous, and unlike the current Tundra, this thing has too big of wheels, looks like it robbed a Kenworth of it's 24" Alcoa's and bolted them onto ugly
#29
#30