mustangs are pathetic tho. 2005 and they had 300hp with a 1/4 time in the 14s....ok so my bone stock 96 trans am i had was 285hp and 325Lb-Ft and ran a 0-60 in 5.6 seconds and ran a 14.0@101mph....mustangs are so slow...9 years too slow to be exact...

 

That was on an IDP extreme race tune with a stock motor. Never ran an edge programmer. I've got a bigger turbo/injectors now with a similar tune from IDP.

 

I wouldn't wona line up next to a 2011 5.0...

 

i have raced a GT, he was ahead of me but barely. he commented to me that he had a hard time getting around me and i was towing a bike trailer with a harley fatboy on it.

i also raced my buddy with a 11 5.0 that was ugly.. he was pretty damn fast.

 

IDP FTW! I daily'd the extreme race tune in my 6.4

 

12 second truck stock..so unfair><

 

yeah but took ford how long? and technically my trans am was a 96 with 285hp but in 93 was when they first put that engine in but it was 275hp instead until 95. so technically ford took til 2005 to be able to beat a 93 trans am or camaro with a GT...thats the pathetic part...and when chevy presented the concept for the camaro being over 400hp..fords first way of answering that was by supercharging the 4.6L....i will admit i am glad they actually answered with a engine you can compare apples to apples...

 

Look's like you had fun at the track, who's tune are you running in the truck?

 

if you are talking to me im running an 87 performance tune from VMPtuning. i also ran in Thompson Ohio at thompson raceway. ran 9 times in 3 trips to the track. and that was before my tuner. also have an 87 towing and a 93 performance tune. only one ive ever run was the 87 perf tune. i live in CO now and 93 isnt available here. and i do actually use 87 for my truck even tho technically 85 should be the same in high elevation as 87 is in lower elevation. but i can tell the difference using 87 and justin told me to if i could tell the difference then use the better one.

 

spartan hybrid race.