PUTC: Next Gen 2016 Super Duty Spied!
#17
#19
I agree. Most never run off road or need the solid front axle anyway. What they should do is make the F250 have IFS and let the F350 keep the solid front axle. That way those that buy them for towing their RV's etc and never go off road will have the smoother ride and no death wobble.
#20
I agree. Most never run off road or need the solid front axle anyway. What they should do is make the F250 have IFS and let the F350 keep the solid front axle. That way those that buy them for towing their RV's etc and never go off road will have the smoother ride and no death wobble.
#22
#23
I agree. Most never run off road or need the solid front axle anyway. What they should do is make the F250 have IFS and let the F350 keep the solid front axle. That way those that buy them for towing their RV's etc and never go off road will have the smoother ride and no death wobble.
Adrianspeeder
#24
Please don't compare the TTB with today's IFS. Heck, my SFA F250 rides better than any TTB F150 my dad had when I was younger.
#25
#26
I don't think it would be too difficult or expensive, really. I mean, the SFA is pretty simple, and you wouldn't really have to do much with it. Just engineer a solid IFS system (which, if rumor is correct, was done back around '05-'08 time frame) and design similar mounting points. IFS on the F250 and SFA on the F350 sounds like a good thing to me. Seriously, most Super Duty buyers don't need the SFA and would be perfectly happy (if not happier) with IFS. Mount an EcoBoost V8 under the hood and I'm in!
#29
#30
Honestly, I think the Super Duty rides pretty good for what it is - a very capable, big a$$ truck! However, I think IFS is just what it needs to put it over the top and take away some of the "bulk" that comes with driving it.