Oh Moma I got to get me one of these Camera's
#1
06-21-2003 | 11:47 AM
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 0
From: Selden NY
Oh Moma I got to get me one of these Camera's
My Nephew got this Awesome Hi Res Digital Camera
so I asked him to pop off two quick shots
HOLY MOLY IS ALL I GOT TO SAY
I NEED ONE OF THESE
My god a piece of dust looks like a big white dot
It's a Little Kodac Camera, takes Vid's with sound too.
I think I'll get the identical one ?
so I asked him to pop off two quick shots
HOLY MOLY IS ALL I GOT TO SAY
I NEED ONE OF THESE
My god a piece of dust looks like a big white dot
It's a Little Kodac Camera, takes Vid's with sound too.
I think I'll get the identical one ?
Last edited by Rob_02Lightning; 06-21-2003 at 11:52 AM.
#2
06-21-2003 | 01:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Holy bandwith Batman!
Geez, I feel like I just entered the land of the giants. You might want to resize those pictures there buddy. I think you just wiped out my bandwidth for my modem. j/k lol.
As far as cameras go, look for one that has around 3.2 megapixels. They are pretty affordabe now, and will take a quality picture with a reasonable print size. The higher resolution ones (4.0 and above) will give you a better picture if you want to blow the picture up to a larger size, but a 3.2 will do pretty much anything you want. Canon, Olympus and Sony make one in that range that's pretty reasonable. I spent $300.00 on mine and it's an Olympus 3000 (since replaced as a 3020 or 3040). They are definitely nice for still pictures.
Geez, I feel like I just entered the land of the giants. You might want to resize those pictures there buddy. I think you just wiped out my bandwidth for my modem. j/k lol.
As far as cameras go, look for one that has around 3.2 megapixels. They are pretty affordabe now, and will take a quality picture with a reasonable print size. The higher resolution ones (4.0 and above) will give you a better picture if you want to blow the picture up to a larger size, but a 3.2 will do pretty much anything you want. Canon, Olympus and Sony make one in that range that's pretty reasonable. I spent $300.00 on mine and it's an Olympus 3000 (since replaced as a 3020 or 3040). They are definitely nice for still pictures.
#4
06-21-2003 | 01:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,632
Likes: 1
From: Stinkin Joisey
Originally posted by easterisland
The only problem with taking high res pictures is people can see how dirty your tail pipes are...
The only problem with taking high res pictures is people can see how dirty your tail pipes are...
I agree, the new camera's take some pic that show great details....hehe.... and are on the side of affordability
#7
06-21-2003 | 02:45 PM
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Trending Topics
#8
06-21-2003 | 02:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
From: here
#14
06-21-2003 | 05:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 0
From: Miami / NYC
The zoom is best utilized in situations like these.
here's the full res pic
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...c.jpg.orig.jpg
