O.J. "If I did it...."
#1
O.J. "If I did it...."
Fox plans to broadcast an interview with O.J. Simpson in which the former football star discusses "how he would have committed" the slayings of his ex-wife and her friend, for which he was acquitted, the network said.
The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.
Simpson has agreed to an "unrestricted" interview with book publisher Judith Regan, Fox said.
"O.J. Simpson, in his own words, tells for the first time how he would have committed the murders if he were the one responsible for the crimes," the network said in a statement. "In the two-part event, Simpson describes how he would have carried out the murders he has vehemently denied committing for over a decade."
The interview will air days before Simpson's new book, "If I Did It," goes on sale Nov. 30. The book, published by Regan, "hypothetically describes how the murders would have been committed."
The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.
Simpson has agreed to an "unrestricted" interview with book publisher Judith Regan, Fox said.
"O.J. Simpson, in his own words, tells for the first time how he would have committed the murders if he were the one responsible for the crimes," the network said in a statement. "In the two-part event, Simpson describes how he would have carried out the murders he has vehemently denied committing for over a decade."
The interview will air days before Simpson's new book, "If I Did It," goes on sale Nov. 30. The book, published by Regan, "hypothetically describes how the murders would have been committed."
#3
I'm going to laugh really hard when he describes his plan and it ends up being exactly what happened to them.
Reporter responds"...oh..Well OJ that is exactly how it did happen!"
OJ:"Well I'm just saying if I did it, that's what I would do. Remember the glove didn't fit."
Reporter:"Uh, ok"
Duke
Reporter responds"...oh..Well OJ that is exactly how it did happen!"
OJ:"Well I'm just saying if I did it, that's what I would do. Remember the glove didn't fit."
Reporter:"Uh, ok"
Duke
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by lovetrucks
It sounds disturbing to me.
The day will come when he will have to answer for what he did.
#11
Originally Posted by Tbird69
O.J is a piece of trash and the producers at Fox have no moral fiber whatsoever. Has anyone at Fox thought about what this will do to the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown? No, of course not there's too much money and ratings to be had with this. O.J is so desperate to be in the spotlight he'll do anything to get it.
The day will come when he will have to answer for what he did.
The day will come when he will have to answer for what he did.
#14
#15
Wrongful Death suit? Sorry, but I wouldn't have paid that either! Eff that.
Sorry, but if I am "acquitted" of the murders in my criminal trial, you're gonna sue me, and WIN in a Civil Trial, because some idiot lawyer said I could've done it? What kind of ****-rule was that? I'm "guilty" or "liable" because I "could've done it"? Come on guys,if that were anyone else, you guys would be ranting and raving about how this trial was a waste of taxpayer money.
***********************
Now, I'll be the first to admit that OJ had motive, I mean- you're paying your Ex-Wife $32,000 a month in child-support and alimony, and she's messing around with some youngster, giving guys a "Lewinski" in front of your kids, and letting them drive cars you bought and paid for? That would man any man upset. We do know a little bit about what she was into, unfortunately, I'm sure there's a lot we don't know. Besides, 12 jurors foudn OJ Not guilty. It wasn't majority rule, it was unanimous. Those folks lived, ate, and slept that trial for months- I'm sure they heard more than we saw in the days media re-cap.
Is he guilty? I don't know. Could he have done it? Sure Would it be difficult, Yes. To be one man and brutally kill two able-bodied adults with a knife would be very difficult. Possible, but difficult.
Is OJ taking advantage of an opportunity to make $$? Yes, and you know what, it's gonna make a ton of money because 10-years later, people are still talking about it. People are still mad about it. People are still happy about it.
Personally, I think it is in very bad taste, and I think OJ is a d**ned fool for pulling a stunt like this. He should've gathered a tribe of women and moved to Bahrain the day the Criminal trial was over. He should not open his mouth about this case. But, at the same time, they took everything this man had, and at the end of the day, the reason for doing so was based upon an angry public, a stupid law, and an unsubstantiated-circumstantial gut feeling. So, yes- he needs to make some $ to live- I just think this is sensationalist, but, that garners ratings. As long as the media isn't editorializing on it (A Fox Reporter) then anything else becomes "entertainment".
If we were in the same boat, and we tapped our brakes on a rain-slickened road, and the car behind us with 3 people in it, veered off the road, and they ran into a tree, killing two of them, but the third person survived. Now, you didn't hit their car, you didn't veer in front of them, all you did was tap your brakes, and that result was two dead kids...
Your action caused a chain reaction that lead to the death of those kids...
Are you "liable" to their family for $33,000,000.00 because their kid died?
Sorry, but if I am "acquitted" of the murders in my criminal trial, you're gonna sue me, and WIN in a Civil Trial, because some idiot lawyer said I could've done it? What kind of ****-rule was that? I'm "guilty" or "liable" because I "could've done it"? Come on guys,if that were anyone else, you guys would be ranting and raving about how this trial was a waste of taxpayer money.
***********************
Now, I'll be the first to admit that OJ had motive, I mean- you're paying your Ex-Wife $32,000 a month in child-support and alimony, and she's messing around with some youngster, giving guys a "Lewinski" in front of your kids, and letting them drive cars you bought and paid for? That would man any man upset. We do know a little bit about what she was into, unfortunately, I'm sure there's a lot we don't know. Besides, 12 jurors foudn OJ Not guilty. It wasn't majority rule, it was unanimous. Those folks lived, ate, and slept that trial for months- I'm sure they heard more than we saw in the days media re-cap.
Is he guilty? I don't know. Could he have done it? Sure Would it be difficult, Yes. To be one man and brutally kill two able-bodied adults with a knife would be very difficult. Possible, but difficult.
Is OJ taking advantage of an opportunity to make $$? Yes, and you know what, it's gonna make a ton of money because 10-years later, people are still talking about it. People are still mad about it. People are still happy about it.
Personally, I think it is in very bad taste, and I think OJ is a d**ned fool for pulling a stunt like this. He should've gathered a tribe of women and moved to Bahrain the day the Criminal trial was over. He should not open his mouth about this case. But, at the same time, they took everything this man had, and at the end of the day, the reason for doing so was based upon an angry public, a stupid law, and an unsubstantiated-circumstantial gut feeling. So, yes- he needs to make some $ to live- I just think this is sensationalist, but, that garners ratings. As long as the media isn't editorializing on it (A Fox Reporter) then anything else becomes "entertainment".
If we were in the same boat, and we tapped our brakes on a rain-slickened road, and the car behind us with 3 people in it, veered off the road, and they ran into a tree, killing two of them, but the third person survived. Now, you didn't hit their car, you didn't veer in front of them, all you did was tap your brakes, and that result was two dead kids...
Your action caused a chain reaction that lead to the death of those kids...
Are you "liable" to their family for $33,000,000.00 because their kid died?
Last edited by Bighersh; 11-16-2006 at 03:03 PM.