Chili : Beans or No Beans?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:10 PM
Favre's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Chili : Beans or No Beans?

Which? And Explain why
 
  #2  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:15 PM
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Beans!!! It's just what I'm used to from growing up. We added beans and ate it over rice. My wife makes fun of me for eating chili over rice. I thought everyone did until I got married. I asked my Dad about it and he said the rice and beans were cheap filler when they were poor. So I've ate it like that since I was a kid.
 
  #3  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:21 PM
ParkM's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Picayune, Ms/Alexandria, La
beans and rice! Just the way it was growing up in southern louisiana. just like biscuits and gravy and community coffee
 
  #4  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:21 PM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,034
Likes: 70
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
There is no such thing as chili with beans! In Texas, that's a casserole.
 
__________________
Jim
  #5  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:21 PM
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,310
Likes: 777
From: Joplin MO
A chili purist will shoot anyone caught putting beans in chili.

http://www.sheilaomalley.com/archives/001163.html
 
  #6  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:22 PM
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
I use both dark red and ight red beans---but then again, I make turkey chiliand I make it rather on the spicy side.

Tim C.

PS---if you have ever been to Cinci they have this stuff called Skyline Chili that isserved with noodles.
 
  #7  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:48 PM
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 6
From: Georgia on my mind...

The hard core CASA guys in Texas will draw and quarter you if you put beans in the chili.

Me, I'm easy. I like it either way.
 
  #8  
Old 12-02-2007 | 11:57 PM
Photog95's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
I have always been a firm believer in the fact that chili does not have beans in it. Recently I have started puting beans in mine. It is cheap filler and when you are feeding five growing kids you need a huge pot
 
  #9  
Old 12-03-2007 | 12:31 AM
TexEdition's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Chili by definition does not include beans..

Beans don't bother me in so-called chili, I'll eat it up and enjoy it, but it's NOT chili.. It's a stew..

If you've ever had a bowl of red you'd understand...

I do believe that the folks who include beans in their chili recipe are the same ones who pronounce pecan pie "pee-can" pie..

They just don't get it at all..

 
  #10  
Old 12-03-2007 | 12:39 AM
CANES676400's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville
Originally Posted by s2krn
Beans!!! It's just what I'm used to from growing up. We added beans and ate it over rice. My wife makes fun of me for eating chili over rice. I thought everyone did until I got married. I asked my Dad about it and he said the rice and beans were cheap filler when they were poor. So I've ate it like that since I was a kid.
thats the same way i eat it, except with some tostito chips also
 
  #11  
Old 12-03-2007 | 01:09 AM
wild-mtn-rose's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere near the back of beyond
I always put beans in my chili. It's the way my mom did it growing up and the way I've done it for 26 years now.
 
  #12  
Old 12-03-2007 | 07:36 AM
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
Real chili, no beans. The term chili con carne means peppers with meat, not beans.
 
  #13  
Old 12-03-2007 | 07:48 AM
MSH's Avatar
MSH
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
///
 

Last edited by MSH; 03-10-2008 at 02:47 PM.
  #14  
Old 12-03-2007 | 08:49 AM
lovetrucks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by s2krn
Beans!!! It's just what I'm used to from growing up. We added beans and ate it over rice. My wife makes fun of me for eating chili over rice. I thought everyone did until I got married. I asked my Dad about it and he said the rice and beans were cheap filler when they were poor. So I've ate it like that since I was a kid.
Exactly how I've had it all my life, with dark kidney beans.

And yes, I say pee-can.
 
  #15  
Old 12-03-2007 | 09:22 AM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,034
Likes: 70
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by lovetrucks
Exactly how I've had it all my life, with dark kidney beans.

And yes, I say pee-can.
As I explained previously, that is not chili, that is a chili casserole. Nothing wrong with a chili casserole as long as you know what you're eating. But, kidney beans? Yuck! Add some potatoes and make a stew!

Chili is chili and you can top it off with chopped onion, cheese or more peppers and maybe some Fritos. Any more and you have a casserole.


The pee-can goes a long way explaining the whole problem!
 
__________________
Jim


Quick Reply: Chili : Beans or No Beans?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM.