Our find president

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-28-2009 | 03:52 AM
Habibi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Normally I would jump on a bandwagon in a situation like this (kettle calling the pot black, etc), but in all fairness I think it was actually a typo, not a misspelling. Note the location of the key he used, and the key likely intended...

:o

He does still deserve to be heckled for it though
I knew that when I was writing my post, but I was too lazy to get into the specifics of his blunder.
I figured it was one of those 'goes without saying' type of things, however, I'm glad you said it, and yes, he deserves to get beat on for any possible reason made available to us.
 
  #17  
Old 01-28-2009 | 08:53 AM
95'F-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by dexx00420
^^^ Obama cool-aid drinkers......just plain stupid or both ignorant and stupid.........it'd be funny if it weren't so serious.

I'm not an "Obama lover" however yes i did vote for him. Who are you to sit here, behind a screen, and personally attack anyone who backs Obama? If your so politically correct, and so intellegent yourself, then how about running for president yourself? I mean I'm sure the US would be so better off, i predict your the second coming of FDR!!!
 
  #18  
Old 01-28-2009 | 09:11 AM
Djacobs28056's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 95'F-150
I'm not an "Obama lover" however yes i did vote for him. Who are you to sit here, behind a screen, and personally attack anyone who backs Obama? If your so politically correct, and so intellegent yourself, then how about running for president yourself? I mean I'm sure the US would be so better off, i predict your the second coming of FDR!!!


 
  #19  
Old 01-28-2009 | 09:43 AM
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by dexx00420
It already has. News was saying in just a week's time he went from the 80's approval down to the low 60's and still falling.

The Carter Era II is now in full effect.
Care to state your source? Gallup polls (you know, that place that does all the pollitical polling) show he was just shy of 70% after taking office and has only slipped 2% as the Inauguration high ends. Me thinks your news station needs some better fact checkers.
 
  #20  
Old 01-28-2009 | 09:45 AM
ballinsoldier's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Olive Branch, MS
Originally Posted by dzervit
Care to state your source? Gallup polls (you know, that place that does all the pollitical polling) show he was just shy of 70% after taking office and has only slipped 2% as the Inauguration high ends. Me thinks your news station needs some better fact checkers.
Those polls don't take into account for homes with more than one TV!
 
  #21  
Old 01-28-2009 | 09:53 AM
Kford's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: The volunteer state (nuttin changed since 1864!!)
oh well like i said before nov. 4 im not worried about what that moron says or does, my hands are clean cause i didnt drop the ball voting
 
  #22  
Old 01-28-2009 | 09:58 AM
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Obama's favorability rating for his transition was 83%...

His favorability rating after the election is now around 68%.

Then again, Carter's rating on taking office was 66% while Reagan's was 51%.
 
  #23  
Old 01-28-2009 | 10:23 AM
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by s2krn
Obama's favorability rating for his transition was 83%...
His favorability rating after the election is now around 68%.

Then again, Carter's rating on taking office was 66% while Reagan's was 51%.

Again, state your source for this outragous 83% number... Obama maxed around 70% (an insane number anyway) but 83% must have been the poll taken in Downtown Detroit while they were handing out government cheeze and welfare checks...

http://www.gallup.com/poll/111838/Ob...opularity.aspx
 

Last edited by Stealth; 01-28-2009 at 11:17 AM. Reason: Removed image due to it containing a curse word.
  #24  
Old 01-28-2009 | 10:29 AM
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dzervit

Again, state your source for this outragous 83% number... Obama maxed around 70% (an insane number anyway) but 83% must have been the poll taken in Downtown Detroit while they were handing out government cheeze and welfare checks...

http://www.gallup.com/poll/111838/Ob...opularity.aspx
OK OK... I'll spoon feed you.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/113824/Ob...ransition.aspx

Let me know if there's anything else you're unwilling to look up for your self. You can reholster your bull**** monitor now.
 

Last edited by Stealth; 01-28-2009 at 11:18 AM. Reason: Removed quoted image due to it containing a curse word.
  #25  
Old 01-28-2009 | 10:52 AM
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by s2krn
OK OK... I'll spoon feed you.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/113824/Ob...ransition.aspx

Let me know if there's anything else you're unwilling to look up for your self. You can reholster your bull**** monitor now.
Finally! Was that so hard skippy? Now that we have the info, we can look at it. That 83% was an approval rating on his transistion and NOT his actual overall performance approval rating. Big difference. The approval rating peaked BEFORE he was even in office at 78%. 68% was his first official presidential approval rating, it currently sits at 65%.

Don't scew the numbers in DIFFERENT polls to spin some magical tale of how America has woken up and hates the new president. Get a grip man. The BS meter on your posts is off the charts.....
 
  #26  
Old 01-28-2009 | 10:57 AM
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Maybe you have a reading problem. If you would slow down and stop trying to be condescending in your posts you might comprehend things a little better. I understand the numbers perfectly. Reread the posts and you might not need people to explain things so much.
 
  #27  
Old 01-28-2009 | 10:59 AM
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
Originally Posted by s2krn
Maybe you have a reading problem. If you would slow down and stop trying to be condescending in your posts you might comprehend things a little better. I understand the numbers perfectly. Reread the posts and you might not need people to explain things so much.

It is hard for you to remain credible wihen one looks at your sig...
 
  #28  
Old 01-28-2009 | 11:01 AM
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by referee54
It is hard for you to remain credible wihen one looks at your sig...
Sorry if my sig hurts your feelings. I posted the numbers that were requested after saying what they were. No credibility needed when the links show what was asked for.
 
  #29  
Old 01-28-2009 | 11:04 AM
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by s2krn
Maybe you have a reading problem. If you would slow down and stop trying to be condescending in your posts you might comprehend things a little better. I understand the numbers perfectly. Reread the posts and you might not need people to explain things so much.
It's hard not to be condescending when I'm always right. Dexx & yourself just love to twist facts to your liking.
 
  #30  
Old 01-28-2009 | 11:06 AM
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
Originally Posted by s2krn
Sorry if my sig hurts your feelings. I posted the numbers that were requested after saying what they were. No credibility needed when the links show what was asked for.
Nah, ya didn't hurt my feelings---I just consider the source, man---CLOSE-MINDED...the code for that is "s2krn"

TSC
 


Quick Reply: Our find president



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.