Well, the delay is finally OVER!!! YAY!!!
#16
02-19-2003, 01:11 PM
Senior Member
#17
02-19-2003, 01:26 PM
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Griffin 01 L
Awesome JC. Give me a call if you want to go to the track sometime. I have since added a few more things to the mod list and I pulled 510lbs of TQ on my last dyno pull. I also added D/R's to the back for traction, so I am hopin for some good track numbers
Awesome JC. Give me a call if you want to go to the track sometime. I have since added a few more things to the mod list and I pulled 510lbs of TQ on my last dyno pull. I also added D/R's to the back for traction, so I am hopin for some good track numbers
We should definitely head up before the spring gets here......at least now it's hot, but not humid.......i'll give u a call!!!!
#18
02-19-2003, 01:37 PM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wouldn't Ford like to know
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
02-19-2003, 01:38 PM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wouldn't Ford like to know
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
02-19-2003, 02:37 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Griffin 01 L, strangely enough I made 369hp and 505 ft/lbs of torque on REM's Mustang dyno with the aforementioned 5# pulley and a single program Diablo chip tuned by Paul and Tim. So most likely it can be done with a 4# pulley as well... and I don't really care what that would read on a dynojet, as numbers are just for bench racing while drinking some beers, the real test is on the track.
#21
02-19-2003, 03:08 PM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wouldn't Ford like to know
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Threre is no sense in arguing with you guys. I have seen probably 15-20 Lightnings dyno at REM, most of which had AT LEAST a #4 pulley and didn't pull 500lbs of TQ. ALL I WAS SAYING IS HE PROBABLY WON'T HIT THOSE NUMBERS! I'm not trying to take anything away from JC's truck. He and I are friends and I gave you my opinion. And you don't have a #4, you have a #5, which is different.
WTF must you people jump down people's throats for sharing a g*d d*mn opinion?
WTF must you people jump down people's throats for sharing a g*d d*mn opinion?
#22
02-19-2003, 07:15 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CORAL SPRINGS, FL. USA
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Beep-Beep---Beep-Beep. News Flash. I just got back from REM at 5:00 pm . JC's truck made 490 lbs of tq. I agree with griff. You need at least a 6 lber to hit over 500 lbs. Although I hear that the tq. numbers are the same on a correct (and I do mean correct) set-up dyno-jet dyno and the eddy current dyno. Its the h.p. #'s that differ.Those high 400 tq. numbers are still impessive.
#23
02-19-2003, 07:17 PM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wouldn't Ford like to know
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
02-19-2003, 07:18 PM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wouldn't Ford like to know
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
02-19-2003, 08:43 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heh... lots of sensitive people around it seems. Though I am still quite happy with my 505 ft/lbs on a 5# pulley. Even backed it up with a cooled down rerrun at 504 ft/lbs. The results depend entirely on your truck and the tuning, as a 4 or a 6# pulley do not guarantee any kind of set number.
#26
02-19-2003, 08:46 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Selden NY
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
