4V Motors for Lightnings
#46
If the 2v heads are so great why don't you see the top mustang guys running them?
Terry , youre confusing yourself. You cannot compare the TQ figures of a 4V vs a 2V unless you divide the rpm's the cobra makes over the the 2V.
#47
the 2v i am referring to was built to rev over 7000 also
it's all in what you build,
i was never a big torque person, but seeing what these roots can do compared to the centrificals now, i'd much rather have had one back when i built my cobra
what i'm saying is, when you have 2 cars making equal hp and 1 is making almost 100 more ft/lbs
that car is going to e.t. better, more than likely anyway
it's all in what you build,
i was never a big torque person, but seeing what these roots can do compared to the centrificals now, i'd much rather have had one back when i built my cobra
what i'm saying is, when you have 2 cars making equal hp and 1 is making almost 100 more ft/lbs
that car is going to e.t. better, more than likely anyway
#48
oh, i seemed to have switched sides. i really wanted some 4 valve heads (4v 5.4 makes 300 vs 260 hp and 355 vs 350 ft/lbs torque) and shouldn't you need better flow for a supercharger?
after this thread though I think I'll wait it out (or get Cobra R heads. Anyone have extras that takes bad personal checks?)
after this thread though I think I'll wait it out (or get Cobra R heads. Anyone have extras that takes bad personal checks?)
#49
Originally posted by sporkdevil
God, they never said anything about that in math class. I've never heard of this (not to say this isn't 100% correct, as it may be), but what sense does that make? RPM does not change depending on engine or anything, it will always mean revs per minute. I would prefer an explanation or logic or something.
God, they never said anything about that in math class. I've never heard of this (not to say this isn't 100% correct, as it may be), but what sense does that make? RPM does not change depending on engine or anything, it will always mean revs per minute. I would prefer an explanation or logic or something.
If you know anything about a 4V motor, it spins higher, obviously. So, how are you going to compare torque figures to a 2V motor when the engine is making more HP up top and the torque is equally spread across the powerband, except when you pull past 6500 RPM where torque falls off on a 4V and HP peaks out? 4V's spin 1000 rpm more then a 2V. Built 4V's spin almost 2000 RPM mroe then a 2v. Ive also seen 2V's spin to 7 and 8K. So they make more torque then a 4V at the range? Nope, not even close.
2V's fall on their *** in the upper 5K range of RPM as you put it and a 4V is just taking off at that RPM
Fastest stangs in the US are running 4V motors genius, so why is that? they are making more torque at the same rpm as a 2v. What happens when looking at a Dyno sheet and seeing the RPM meet the HP curve at 5250 RPM? Unfortunately, Dyno's arent the tell tale answer when ET's speak.
#50
Originally posted by beefcake
the 2v i am referring to was built to rev over 7000 also
it's all in what you build,
i was never a big torque person, but seeing what these roots can do compared to the centrificals now, i'd much rather have had one back when i built my cobra
what i'm saying is, when you have 2 cars making equal hp and 1 is making almost 100 more ft/lbs
that car is going to e.t. better, more than likely anyway
the 2v i am referring to was built to rev over 7000 also
it's all in what you build,
i was never a big torque person, but seeing what these roots can do compared to the centrificals now, i'd much rather have had one back when i built my cobra
what i'm saying is, when you have 2 cars making equal hp and 1 is making almost 100 more ft/lbs
that car is going to e.t. better, more than likely anyway
Roots have come along way since that joke of a kit put out by KB back in the 96-98 Cobra days where 330RWP was about all you were going to extract from that heat pump.
You just cant compare a 2V to a 4V without getting lost in engine specs. One shows higher torque whereas the other shows that torque spread equally across the entire powerband.
TQ has never been the high side of the 4V. However, its ability to rev has always been in its favor and is especially important when using centrigual blowers.
#51
Originally posted by sporkdevil
oh, i seemed to have switched sides. i really wanted some 4 valve heads (4v 5.4 makes 300 vs 260 hp and 355 vs 350 ft/lbs torque) and shouldn't you need better flow for a supercharger?
after this thread though I think I'll wait it out (or get Cobra R heads. Anyone have extras that takes bad personal checks?)
oh, i seemed to have switched sides. i really wanted some 4 valve heads (4v 5.4 makes 300 vs 260 hp and 355 vs 350 ft/lbs torque) and shouldn't you need better flow for a supercharger?
after this thread though I think I'll wait it out (or get Cobra R heads. Anyone have extras that takes bad personal checks?)
Ill take a set of 03 Cobra heads myself. You guys can keep the Cobra R, Gators and FR500 heads.
#53
Originally posted by beefcake
i'm sure coolness factor would be major, but in the end, cost vs hp on lightning combo's i just don't see it being anything close to worth it,
it would be like long tubes times 4 or 5
i'm sure coolness factor would be major, but in the end, cost vs hp on lightning combo's i just don't see it being anything close to worth it,
it would be like long tubes times 4 or 5
It would make one hell of a Silver State Classic runner for top speed though
#57
#58
#59