16X10 Wheels + 28X10 Hoosiers + LFP Ranchos =...
#4
#7
Trending Topics
#10
#14
1.41 60' but you only ran 8.0 @ 81? Sounds a little fishy. No offense but thats the lowest 60' time I've ever heard of on a Gen 2. That is a full .1+ better than guys running mid 10's! Your MPH is low by about 3-4. That run in the quarter is about a 12.55 Which is very good for a 4# full weight truck. I just can't see a 1.41!
Are you running 5.XX rear gears? That is the only way this could possably add up?
Eric
Are you running 5.XX rear gears? That is the only way this could possably add up?
Eric
#15
Originally posted by owheelies
1.41 60' but you only ran 8.0 @ 81? Sounds a little fishy. No offense but thats the lowest 60' time I've ever heard of on a Gen 2. That is a full .1+ better than guys running mid 10's! Your MPH is low by about 3-4. That run in the quarter is about a 12.55 Which is very good for a 4# full weight truck. I just can't see a 1.41!
Are you running 5.XX rear gears? That is the only way this could possably add up?
Eric
1.41 60' but you only ran 8.0 @ 81? Sounds a little fishy. No offense but thats the lowest 60' time I've ever heard of on a Gen 2. That is a full .1+ better than guys running mid 10's! Your MPH is low by about 3-4. That run in the quarter is about a 12.55 Which is very good for a 4# full weight truck. I just can't see a 1.41!
Are you running 5.XX rear gears? That is the only way this could possably add up?
Eric
Eric, I have to agree with you. I just looked at a couple of old time slips from April. Run#1: (60') 1.81; (1/8) 7.82@89.59 (1/4) 12.22@111.34 Run #2: (60') 1.76; (1/8) 7.78@89.54 (1/4) 12.18@111.20
Edit: Here's one closer...(60') 2.08; (1/8) 8.16@89.07 (1/4) 12.57@111.10
Maybe something blew in front of the lights. It happened to me a few times. I ran a 9.50 in my L this year.
Last edited by yysenhimer; 08-01-2003 at 08:20 AM.