Why is every one getting bigger blower's...?
#16
Originally posted by mecca
Yeah Dave,
I plan to run an 8# or 10# pulley (actually trying to find all the different measurements of everyones pulley so I can find the best combo I want... some 8# pulleys are 10", some are 9.5", so im just trying to get the best pulley for my setup) on my new built shortblock, but I plan to add all those cooling items first to make sure im not getting the stock blower way too hot, and get the true power out of the added boost.
-Mike
Yeah Dave,
I plan to run an 8# or 10# pulley (actually trying to find all the different measurements of everyones pulley so I can find the best combo I want... some 8# pulleys are 10", some are 9.5", so im just trying to get the best pulley for my setup) on my new built shortblock, but I plan to add all those cooling items first to make sure im not getting the stock blower way too hot, and get the true power out of the added boost.
-Mike
#17
1. The Eaton is past its efficiency curve stock. It is way past its efficiency curve with pullies. Can lead to detonation, which is the curse of death for a blown engine.
2. The Eaton is overspun stock. It is dangerously overspun with pullies. Can lead to blower failure.
Don't really need a third reason. It's simply easier to get reliable performance when you are working within the performance envelope of the machine.
I had a VW bus that would raise the front wheels off the ground. But the cams shook so hard that they would rattle your teeth at idle. The heads would have warped and the case cracked over time (neither happened because I forgot to fully tighten a fuel banjo -- RIP).
2. The Eaton is overspun stock. It is dangerously overspun with pullies. Can lead to blower failure.
Don't really need a third reason. It's simply easier to get reliable performance when you are working within the performance envelope of the machine.
I had a VW bus that would raise the front wheels off the ground. But the cams shook so hard that they would rattle your teeth at idle. The heads would have warped and the case cracked over time (neither happened because I forgot to fully tighten a fuel banjo -- RIP).
Last edited by Tim Skelton; 09-02-2003 at 11:12 PM.
#19
#20
Originally posted by Tim Skelton
1. The Eaton is past its efficiency curve stock. It is way past its efficiency curve with pullies. Can lead to detonation, which is the curse of death for a blown engine.
2. The Eaton is overspun stock. It is dangerously overspun with pullies. Can lead to blower failure.
1. The Eaton is past its efficiency curve stock. It is way past its efficiency curve with pullies. Can lead to detonation, which is the curse of death for a blown engine.
2. The Eaton is overspun stock. It is dangerously overspun with pullies. Can lead to blower failure.
How many Eatons have you heard of blowing up or failing? Stock Eatons are a dime a dozen these days.. For guys who don't want to ante up for a KB and have a sound vertifiable tune AND their L's are not daily drivers AND they realize the risk I think it's an option while heading for a 11 second timeslip...JMHO of course..
#21
Originally posted by JeffsLightning
Back in 99 it was said that pullies were a waste of time(remember) because the Eaton is already at it's limits...Hummm looks like we should not put any pulley on our engines...
How many Eatons have you heard of blowing up or failing? Stock Eatons are a dime a dozen these days.. For guys who don't want to ante up for a KB and have a sound vertifiable tune AND their L's are not daily drivers AND they realize the risk I think it's an option while heading for a 11 second timeslip...JMHO of course..
Back in 99 it was said that pullies were a waste of time(remember) because the Eaton is already at it's limits...Hummm looks like we should not put any pulley on our engines...
How many Eatons have you heard of blowing up or failing? Stock Eatons are a dime a dozen these days.. For guys who don't want to ante up for a KB and have a sound vertifiable tune AND their L's are not daily drivers AND they realize the risk I think it's an option while heading for a 11 second timeslip...JMHO of course..
I realize that stock Eaton failures are rare, but blown rods from detonation are commonplace. So commonplace in fact that the myth has set in that the rods are "weak."
You can get more HP with pullies to be sure. But you can get even more HP by using the right blower to begin with. As you correctly assert, with a safe (i.e., dyno tuned) chip and the ability to deal with a blown engine, bumping up the boost on the stock Eaton is a viable alternative. But it's still suboptimal. I suspect that you do not disagree.
#22
Originally posted by Tim Skelton
We have no disagreement here, Jeff. I never said that the Eaton was at its limit, only that it was already past its efficiency peak. As any engineer will tell you, running a blower past its efficiency peak is not advisable when a larger blower is available. Why ask the Eaton to do more than it was designed to do when a more suitable blower can be used?
I realize that stock Eaton failures are rare, but blown rods from detonation are commonplace. So commonplace in fact that the myth has set in that the rods are "weak."
You can get more HP with pullies to be sure. But you can get even more HP by using the right blower to begin with. As you correctly assert, with a safe (i.e., dyno tuned) chip and the ability to deal with a blown engine, bumping up the boost on the stock Eaton is a viable alternative. But it's still suboptimal. I suspect that you do not disagree.
We have no disagreement here, Jeff. I never said that the Eaton was at its limit, only that it was already past its efficiency peak. As any engineer will tell you, running a blower past its efficiency peak is not advisable when a larger blower is available. Why ask the Eaton to do more than it was designed to do when a more suitable blower can be used?
I realize that stock Eaton failures are rare, but blown rods from detonation are commonplace. So commonplace in fact that the myth has set in that the rods are "weak."
You can get more HP with pullies to be sure. But you can get even more HP by using the right blower to begin with. As you correctly assert, with a safe (i.e., dyno tuned) chip and the ability to deal with a blown engine, bumping up the boost on the stock Eaton is a viable alternative. But it's still suboptimal. I suspect that you do not disagree.
The combo I was running with my Eaton(12-14psi depending upon air conditions) for the last year or so yielded 400-420 rwhp w/ consistent 12.0-12.2:1 A/F ratios.
Just wondered what your take on that would be as I'm trying to get the KB dialed in as SAFELY as possible.
Thanks in advance,
Rob
#23
Originally posted by Tim Skelton
You can get more HP with pullies to be sure. But you can get even more HP by using the right blower to begin with. As you correctly assert, with a safe (i.e., dyno tuned) chip and the ability to deal with a blown engine, bumping up the boost on the stock Eaton is a viable alternative. But it's still suboptimal. I suspect that you do not disagree.
You can get more HP with pullies to be sure. But you can get even more HP by using the right blower to begin with. As you correctly assert, with a safe (i.e., dyno tuned) chip and the ability to deal with a blown engine, bumping up the boost on the stock Eaton is a viable alternative. But it's still suboptimal. I suspect that you do not disagree.
#24
All I can say is I daily drove my 11 second L w/ an 8# lower and every other bolt-on I could get my hands on for about 10,000 of my Ls 25,000 miles ( @ 5000 miles I got a 4#, then a 6# @ 10000 and a 8# @ 15,000 miles).
I drove in the dead of winter, Long (500 or more miles each way, numerous times) trips and a lot of 1/4 mile passes w/ my stock eaton and stock internals and all on the same tune, thanks JDM(except for the 4#). Yes I have had the same tune for 15,000 miles and in all kind of conditions.
So in my opinion Ford did a nice job w/ the L package, blower and all.
Of course I want more so now the KB goes on and the internals go in.
VINNIE
I drove in the dead of winter, Long (500 or more miles each way, numerous times) trips and a lot of 1/4 mile passes w/ my stock eaton and stock internals and all on the same tune, thanks JDM(except for the 4#). Yes I have had the same tune for 15,000 miles and in all kind of conditions.
So in my opinion Ford did a nice job w/ the L package, blower and all.
Of course I want more so now the KB goes on and the internals go in.
VINNIE
#26
Originally posted by s.cal L 2
This is what I think. If you want to go all the way out and do 10s get a better blower. But why get a better blower, built motor, and have mild boost and a mild tune?
This is what I think. If you want to go all the way out and do 10s get a better blower. But why get a better blower, built motor, and have mild boost and a mild tune?
If I had a built block, I would use MAD boost, but a mild tune. Boost does not kill engines; detonation kills engines. Cylinder pressure even under extreme boost conditions is much lower than even mild detonation.
#27
Originally posted by SLVRNBLK
. . . Is it more stress on an engine internally with 14psi and an 11:1 A/F producing 450rwhp or 12psi and a 12:1 A/F producing 450rwhp (assuming no detonation is present at either boost level)?. . .
. . . Is it more stress on an engine internally with 14psi and an 11:1 A/F producing 450rwhp or 12psi and a 12:1 A/F producing 450rwhp (assuming no detonation is present at either boost level)?. . .
I don't see any problem with 14 PSIG from the Eaton. As measured by the Auto Meter electronic boost gauge, I see 10.5 PSIG consistently with my bone stock '02. Many, many people reliably run 4 lb. pullies with no chip. Run too much timing or too many RPMs with a chip, though, and . . .