JDM customers beware!!!!
#61
Originally posted by E-luzion
How is your point valid.... the guy came on here in a rage and started bashing the hell out of JDM... AND HE ADMITTED NEVER TALKING TO JIM... maybe if he had gone straight to Jim in the first place, he wouldnt have had to start the post in the first place...
And like I said in my first post.. call Jim.. maybe there was a misunderstanding that can be clarified
How is your point valid.... the guy came on here in a rage and started bashing the hell out of JDM... AND HE ADMITTED NEVER TALKING TO JIM... maybe if he had gone straight to Jim in the first place, he wouldnt have had to start the post in the first place...
And like I said in my first post.. call Jim.. maybe there was a misunderstanding that can be clarified
Dude, get a grip. Nick got his truck back from JDM a long time ago. If this was a rage thing he would have posted the day after he found out about the stage II cams. He didn't.
Sounds to me like he spoke with Jim then when Jim got back from Lightning Fest probably spoke with him again...
I don't know the exact details, but Nick isn't one to fly off the handle.
#63
Good info on taping phone calls, looks like he should have no problems with his tapes…
http://www.spyman.com/laws.htm
http://www.spyman.com/laws.htm
#66
Originally posted by easterisland
Dude, get a grip. Nick got his truck back from JDM a long time ago. If this was a rage thing he would have posted the day after he found out about the stage II cams. He didn't.
Sounds to me like he spoke with Jim then when Jim got back from Lightning Fest probably spoke with him again...
I don't know the exact details, but Nick isn't one to fly off the handle.
Dude, get a grip. Nick got his truck back from JDM a long time ago. If this was a rage thing he would have posted the day after he found out about the stage II cams. He didn't.
Sounds to me like he spoke with Jim then when Jim got back from Lightning Fest probably spoke with him again...
I don't know the exact details, but Nick isn't one to fly off the handle.
#67
Originally posted by E-luzion
Aryton is MA you cant record a conversation without the other party knowing... if it ever did go to court.. if the other party never gave consent the tape would be inadmissable.... i believe that is the law in MA... not 100% sure...
Aryton is MA you cant record a conversation without the other party knowing... if it ever did go to court.. if the other party never gave consent the tape would be inadmissable.... i believe that is the law in MA... not 100% sure...
I agree this should be discussed directly with the vendor in question, but I think it has gone beyond that.
#69
Originally posted by whip
Ummm, maybe.....The L has been relieved all dragway duties, and will recieve no further mods due to the AC project, but I might go up just to watch the races.
Ummm, maybe.....The L has been relieved all dragway duties, and will recieve no further mods due to the AC project, but I might go up just to watch the races.
line locks are in and im bolting the 6er on.... so im heading up.. gotta meet up with Don C first though...
#70
Originally posted by Ayrton
That is certainly possible…I of course can’t know all state laws.
I agree this should be discussed directly with the vendor in question, but I think it has gone beyond that.
That is certainly possible…I of course can’t know all state laws.
I agree this should be discussed directly with the vendor in question, but I think it has gone beyond that.
#71
I find it interesting that we are all introduced to these vendors courtesy of this sight, but if someone gets a raw deal from one of them, they are not suppose to voice the issue on the very location that put them in contact with that SUPPORTING vendor.
Rocks
Rocks
#74
Originally posted by 03LightninRocks
I find it interesting that we are all introduced to these vendors courtesy of this sight, but if someone gets a raw deal from one of them, they are not suppose to voice the issue on the very location that put them in contact with that SUPPORTING vendor.
Rocks
I find it interesting that we are all introduced to these vendors courtesy of this sight, but if someone gets a raw deal from one of them, they are not suppose to voice the issue on the very location that put them in contact with that SUPPORTING vendor.
Rocks
#75
Originally posted by E-luzion
Maybe he isnt the type of person to fly off the handle... but he might have to discuss his issue with Jim again... and ill say it once again maybe there was a misunderstanding that needs to be clarified
Maybe he isnt the type of person to fly off the handle... but he might have to discuss his issue with Jim again... and ill say it once again maybe there was a misunderstanding that needs to be clarified
What misunderstanding? That JDM installed the wrong blower on his truck or that JDM installed the wrong cams?