FFW TT Payouts
#1
FFW TT Payouts
I just saw this posted over on the FFW sight. Thanks to Jim@JDM the pay outs for Tough Truck have been increased quite a bit this year.
The T/T payouts have been raised to $1000 to win, $300 for runner-up, $75 for the semis and $50 for the quarterfinalists.
Pretty good incentive to sign up for the TT competition if you ask me. I hope to see alot of you at the Orlando Opener this year.
Thank You Jim. Once again, giving back to the community. It is appreciated.
Rocks
The T/T payouts have been raised to $1000 to win, $300 for runner-up, $75 for the semis and $50 for the quarterfinalists.
Pretty good incentive to sign up for the TT competition if you ask me. I hope to see alot of you at the Orlando Opener this year.
Thank You Jim. Once again, giving back to the community. It is appreciated.
Rocks
Last edited by Silver_2000; 02-07-2005 at 08:20 AM.
#7
Prize schedule sounds great! Thank you JDM.
Now all we need is some incentive to let our trucks run at their best at these meets. How about working towards a sliding scale for handicapping that gives the fastest trucks a larger percentage handicap versus the slower ones?
This will make most racers and all the fans much happier than a straight 100% handicap style event. The faster trucks take more risk with racing variables and should be rewarded. Lets show everyone what these things can really do.
Jim
Now all we need is some incentive to let our trucks run at their best at these meets. How about working towards a sliding scale for handicapping that gives the fastest trucks a larger percentage handicap versus the slower ones?
This will make most racers and all the fans much happier than a straight 100% handicap style event. The faster trucks take more risk with racing variables and should be rewarded. Lets show everyone what these things can really do.
Jim
Trending Topics
#10
Originally posted by Ct.TOPGUN
Prize schedule sounds great! Thank you JDM.
Now all we need is some incentive to let our trucks run at their best at these meets. How about working towards a sliding scale for handicapping that gives the fastest trucks a larger percentage handicap versus the slower ones?
This will make most racers and all the fans much happier than a straight 100% handicap style event. The faster trucks take more risk with racing variables and should be rewarded. Lets show everyone what these things can really do.
Jim
Prize schedule sounds great! Thank you JDM.
Now all we need is some incentive to let our trucks run at their best at these meets. How about working towards a sliding scale for handicapping that gives the fastest trucks a larger percentage handicap versus the slower ones?
This will make most racers and all the fans much happier than a straight 100% handicap style event. The faster trucks take more risk with racing variables and should be rewarded. Lets show everyone what these things can really do.
Jim
Different class....
#11
#13
Originally posted by Silver_2000_!
Thats not bracket racing - Thats heads up
Different class....
Thats not bracket racing - Thats heads up
Different class....
I always hope to find a better compromise somewhere in between
that does not work on 100% handicap.
I strongly feel that at least for street type vehicles most owners and fans would prefer to see the competitors at there best, not detuned.
It is fairly foolish to run ***** out in current bracket racing format,ifyou expect to be competative. 100% handicap formats give slower vehicles a chance to compete onagainst much faster vehicles without too many rules, but give the advantage to the slower,more predictable one.
A variable handicap format would be appealing to racers and fans, while still giving all a chance. It would give faster vehicles an incentive to run all out, rewarded for the risks of traction and performance variables.
The correct scale for rewarding the fast competitors and allowing the slower ones to be competative must be worked out.
After watching FFW brackets at a few venues,and comparig the event to open track sessions, full bracket racing pales in comparison. some style of handicapping is needed however to open up the field to varied vehicles in gteater number.
Just food for thought.
Jim
#14
Originally posted by Ct.TOPGUN
I know the difference between "heads up" and "bracket" racing.
I always hope to find a better compromise somewhere in between
that does not work on 100% handicap.
I strongly feel that at least for street type vehicles most owners and fans would prefer to see the competitors at there best, not detuned.
It is fairly foolish to run ***** out in current bracket racing format,ifyou expect to be competative. 100% handicap formats give slower vehicles a chance to compete onagainst much faster vehicles without too many rules, but give the advantage to the slower,more predictable one.
A variable handicap format would be appealing to racers and fans, while still giving all a chance. It would give faster vehicles an incentive to run all out, rewarded for the risks of traction and performance variables.
The correct scale for rewarding the fast competitors and allowing the slower ones to be competative must be worked out.
After watching FFW brackets at a few venues,and comparig the event to open track sessions, full bracket racing pales in comparison. some style of handicapping is needed however to open up the field to varied vehicles in gteater number.
Just food for thought.
Jim
I know the difference between "heads up" and "bracket" racing.
I always hope to find a better compromise somewhere in between
that does not work on 100% handicap.
I strongly feel that at least for street type vehicles most owners and fans would prefer to see the competitors at there best, not detuned.
It is fairly foolish to run ***** out in current bracket racing format,ifyou expect to be competative. 100% handicap formats give slower vehicles a chance to compete onagainst much faster vehicles without too many rules, but give the advantage to the slower,more predictable one.
A variable handicap format would be appealing to racers and fans, while still giving all a chance. It would give faster vehicles an incentive to run all out, rewarded for the risks of traction and performance variables.
The correct scale for rewarding the fast competitors and allowing the slower ones to be competative must be worked out.
After watching FFW brackets at a few venues,and comparig the event to open track sessions, full bracket racing pales in comparison. some style of handicapping is needed however to open up the field to varied vehicles in gteater number.
Just food for thought.
Jim
It will likely require a separate class which would detract from the attendance numbers of TT
Doug