Bye Bye PI Torque converter Hello Navigator Converter
#31
Originally Posted by Don's Bolt
Well Maybee Jim with chime in, as I was told this is a 2 clutch design not a single one like Greg has stated. I know Jim wouldn't sell me anything that won't hold up for me, as he knows how I use my truck. I am sure he doesn't want one of his customers having problems.
So maybee there is indeed a converter Greg is not aware off
So maybee there is indeed a converter Greg is not aware off
Personally, I think he installed a stock converter and didn't think anyone would know any better. It's when people do things like this that give all vendors a bad name.
You said Jim wants me to call him and he'll tell me what you have. Hell, ask him yourself for the part number and post it, and I'll post the build matrix for what number he gives you. Or is the secret part his own secret? I gave up talking to Jim a long time ago. If I'm right he says I just copied it from a manual (when a few of the manuals I actually wrote), and threaten to call Ford Security on me for posting secret information in public. Nothing I've posted is protected, anything I put up is availible from your friendly local dealer, I just know what to ask and most people don't. Like I said, all I want to do is keep someone from finding out the part he said it is won't fit when they have their transmission setting on the floor.
An XL7Z converter won't fit in a Lightning and won't live long if you hammer it in or change to a weaker flex plate to make it fit. That's the facts.
G
#33
#34
Don,
Greg is just trying to pull a JJ on you here. You remeber the time he told you to get your motor scoped to see if you had manley rods in it. The torque convertor that is in your truck is the same exact one in mine. Its a two clutch in there it will stall to about 2000 rpms. I was leaving the line at 1700, it is a factory production convertor, it was built for a limited production navigator. The internals are production Lightning except for the stator. Its definatley proven, ran a whole season with it in ours running 10.50's. Because it is a tighter stall you get better driveability and better mph at the track.
Greg I dont appreciate your little digs and jabs in your posts, I could tell you one thing we have had more FT trannys rebuilt than we have had stock ones rebuilt. Because you throw a bunch of free valvebodys to people they become loyal to you because you gave them something. Then you sell them a transmission that falls apart faster than the stock unit. If you come on here with your intellegence of transmission try to do that more and not your spite in all you posts.
Jim@JDM
Greg is just trying to pull a JJ on you here. You remeber the time he told you to get your motor scoped to see if you had manley rods in it. The torque convertor that is in your truck is the same exact one in mine. Its a two clutch in there it will stall to about 2000 rpms. I was leaving the line at 1700, it is a factory production convertor, it was built for a limited production navigator. The internals are production Lightning except for the stator. Its definatley proven, ran a whole season with it in ours running 10.50's. Because it is a tighter stall you get better driveability and better mph at the track.
Greg I dont appreciate your little digs and jabs in your posts, I could tell you one thing we have had more FT trannys rebuilt than we have had stock ones rebuilt. Because you throw a bunch of free valvebodys to people they become loyal to you because you gave them something. Then you sell them a transmission that falls apart faster than the stock unit. If you come on here with your intellegence of transmission try to do that more and not your spite in all you posts.
Jim@JDM
#35
Jim,
That's my stock tranny parts with 65,000 hard miles on them. At 3,000 miles it was chipped with shift durations shortened along with removal of torque reduction and ran that way for 62,000 miles. I also installed a 160 thermostat which not only keeps the motor cooler but the tranny as well since the fluid flows through the radiator. At 18,000 miles I installed a Line Mod Valve and changed the fluid running that for 27,000 miles. At 45,000 miles I installed a FTVB with total fluid change and ran that for the remaining 20,000 miles.
I have been in the 400/500 club for 3 years or more and my last dyno was 482 HP/ 562 TQ. I've done tons of kickdowns and over 300 quarter mile passes.
There was no sign of weakness in the tranny looking at my mph at the track before and after the rebuild. The only reason it was rebuilt is because I put a stall converter in and couldn't justify not rebuilding it with that many miles.
The OD steels which show the only significant damage have probably been that way for years. I haven't hit OD at WOT in years because of the load it puts on the motor and the best chance of slinging a rod through the block.
The moral to this story is the stock tranny is a very good piece and with regular fluid changes they hold up well. I would say constant hotlapping and roadracing would do one of these in faster than anything because of the constant heat that would be created in the fluid.
Guess who has more miles than I do on their stock tranny. That would be Frank5L and his stock motored turbo truck that ran a 10.75 twice Thursday night at MMP.
That's my stock tranny parts with 65,000 hard miles on them. At 3,000 miles it was chipped with shift durations shortened along with removal of torque reduction and ran that way for 62,000 miles. I also installed a 160 thermostat which not only keeps the motor cooler but the tranny as well since the fluid flows through the radiator. At 18,000 miles I installed a Line Mod Valve and changed the fluid running that for 27,000 miles. At 45,000 miles I installed a FTVB with total fluid change and ran that for the remaining 20,000 miles.
I have been in the 400/500 club for 3 years or more and my last dyno was 482 HP/ 562 TQ. I've done tons of kickdowns and over 300 quarter mile passes.
There was no sign of weakness in the tranny looking at my mph at the track before and after the rebuild. The only reason it was rebuilt is because I put a stall converter in and couldn't justify not rebuilding it with that many miles.
The OD steels which show the only significant damage have probably been that way for years. I haven't hit OD at WOT in years because of the load it puts on the motor and the best chance of slinging a rod through the block.
The moral to this story is the stock tranny is a very good piece and with regular fluid changes they hold up well. I would say constant hotlapping and roadracing would do one of these in faster than anything because of the constant heat that would be created in the fluid.
Guess who has more miles than I do on their stock tranny. That would be Frank5L and his stock motored turbo truck that ran a 10.75 twice Thursday night at MMP.
Last edited by LTNBOLT; 10-29-2005 at 12:35 PM.
#36
2 man enter....1 man leave.
All I want is a good converter that stalls @ 2000 and runs great on the street. I would also like to use a FTVB to help get a better shift. I would use both Jim and Greg for their products but man this makes for some fun reading
Ya'll just keep it above the belt.
Ya'll just keep it above the belt.
#37
#38
Originally Posted by Jim@JDM
Don,
Greg I dont appreciate your little digs and jabs in your posts, I could tell you one thing we have had more FT trannys rebuilt than we have had stock ones rebuilt.
Jim@JDM
Greg I dont appreciate your little digs and jabs in your posts, I could tell you one thing we have had more FT trannys rebuilt than we have had stock ones rebuilt.
Jim@JDM
I glad the converter is working out for Don. I've never met him, but from his posts he seems like a genuinely nice person who really enjoys his Lightning. Congats.
David
Edited to be less malicious.
Last edited by Fear Itself; 10-29-2005 at 02:52 PM.
#39
#40
Originally Posted by Jim@JDM
Don,
Greg is just trying to pull a JJ on you here. You remeber the time he told you to get your motor scoped to see if you had manley rods in it. The torque convertor that is in your truck is the same exact one in mine. Its a two clutch in there it will stall to about 2000 rpms. I was leaving the line at 1700, it is a factory production convertor, it was built for a limited production navigator. The internals are production Lightning except for the stator. Its definatley proven, ran a whole season with it in ours running 10.50's. Because it is a tighter stall you get better driveability and better mph at the track.
Greg I dont appreciate your little digs and jabs in your posts, I could tell you one thing we have had more FT trannys rebuilt than we have had stock ones rebuilt. Because you throw a bunch of free valvebodys to people they become loyal to you because you gave them something. Then you sell them a transmission that falls apart faster than the stock unit. If you come on here with your intellegence of transmission try to do that more and not your spite in all you posts.
Jim@JDM
Greg is just trying to pull a JJ on you here. You remeber the time he told you to get your motor scoped to see if you had manley rods in it. The torque convertor that is in your truck is the same exact one in mine. Its a two clutch in there it will stall to about 2000 rpms. I was leaving the line at 1700, it is a factory production convertor, it was built for a limited production navigator. The internals are production Lightning except for the stator. Its definatley proven, ran a whole season with it in ours running 10.50's. Because it is a tighter stall you get better driveability and better mph at the track.
Greg I dont appreciate your little digs and jabs in your posts, I could tell you one thing we have had more FT trannys rebuilt than we have had stock ones rebuilt. Because you throw a bunch of free valvebodys to people they become loyal to you because you gave them something. Then you sell them a transmission that falls apart faster than the stock unit. If you come on here with your intellegence of transmission try to do that more and not your spite in all you posts.
Jim@JDM
Post up the part # for the convertor to prove Gregg wrong or just keep quite. My MB/TD kicks A$$ and has held up to a ton of abuse! Arguments are won on FACTS..not " since I say so".
Let the JJ / JDM go..MY GOD! IT'S HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS THREAD.
#41
Originally Posted by Jim@JDM
Chuck was this before or after your factory tech valvebody was installed. I cant tell you how many transmissions we had Brian @ BTS rebuild after those things.
Are you saying that the installation of the FTVB has resulted in a significant number of transmission failures?
I'm concerned because I have one in my transmission.
TB
#43
#44
#45