Lightning

Pics of KB's 2.6L unit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-14-2006 | 05:17 PM
whip's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
Methinks you paint with too broad of a brush.

"Billet" is a process, not a material. Start with soft alloy, and you will end up with soft part. Start with a hard alloy, and you will end up with something stiffer than any casting can produce.

Like most large aluminum parts, supercharger cases are usually cast because it's much cheaper than the machining required to produce it from solid stock (AKA "billet"). When machining a large part, the material costs are also way higher because you have to buy a lot of metal that ends up as shavings.
Again...I wish there was a feature on this forum that would allow me to add a "me too" when Tim says something! (Except ofcoarse the smoking issue!)
It comes down to money. Cast is cheap. Billet process is expensive.
 
  #17  
Old 05-14-2006 | 06:37 PM
Falcon11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Can't wait to see some comparisons to the Whipple

I'm glad KB and Whipple are steppin up 2 the plate for the L guys!
 
  #18  
Old 05-14-2006 | 07:07 PM
NCsvt2003L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
Methinks you paint with too broad of a brush.

"Billet" is a process, not a material. Start with soft alloy, and you will end up with soft part. Start with a hard alloy, and you will end up with something stiffer than any casting can produce.

Like most large aluminum parts, supercharger cases are usually cast because it's much cheaper than the machining required to produce it from solid stock (AKA "billet"). When machining a large part, the material costs are also way higher because you have to buy a lot of metal that ends up as shavings.
I know what you are saying Tim, but for some odd reason billet cases flex and cast ones don't. Maybe be in the casting process in which casting is a process, too, they can make the case thicker? BTW, I hate painting!-lol.
 
  #19  
Old 05-14-2006 | 09:22 PM
99svtlightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
From: Elkton, MD
The Gen 2 Lightning specific was the only cast supercharger casing I've seen from KB. I'm sure cost and overall appearance was a contributing factor. However, the 03/04 Cobra, 05/06 GT, etc. are all billet superchargers and flex doesn't seem to be an issue.

I personally like the looks of the billet casing, rather than the cast.
 
  #20  
Old 05-14-2006 | 09:25 PM
NCsvt2003L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Originally Posted by 99svtlightning
The Gen 2 Lightning specific was the only cast supercharger casing I've seen from KB. I'm sure cost and overall appearance was a contributing factor. However, the 03/04 Cobra, 05/06 GT, etc. are all billet superchargers and flex doesn't seem to be an issue.

I personally like the looks of the billet casing, rather than the cast.
There is a difference between the Mustang cars and the Lightnings. It has to do with the lower intake. By the way the original 2.3's were suppose to be billet. They changed it to cast after extensive testing. Same problem Whipple had with running a billet midplate.
 

Last edited by NCsvt2003L; 05-14-2006 at 10:26 PM.
  #21  
Old 05-14-2006 | 10:05 PM
kerno's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Kihei, HI (most of the time)
The debate between the merits of cast aluminum, like alloy 356-2 vs forged material, like 6061-T6 has raged for years. Here are some sample numbers:
356 has a yield tensile of 24,100 pounds per sq inch.
6061-T6 has a yield tensile of 40,000 pounds per square inch.
356 will elongate 3.5 percent before it fractures.
6061 will elongate about 12 percent before it fractures.
So, the 6061 or "billet", does win the battle on strength. However, cast material tends to be quite a bit more stable, with less post-machining distortion. A chunk of 6061 big enough to make that blower housing is going to warp a whole bunch once all the material is removed from the center. If I were machining the housing myself, I'd rough machine it to within about 1/16 inch of final size and have it cold stabilized. I'd then finish machine it, knowing it was still going to move.
I've seen latent stresses in 6061 distort parts for a month after final machining.
So, given a choice, I'll take my blower housing as a casting, but still want my pistons to be forgings.
 
  #22  
Old 05-15-2006 | 09:18 PM
Big Man's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Eddyville, Ky
Heres a pic of the back.

 
  #23  
Old 05-15-2006 | 11:32 PM
Falcon11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by Big Man
Heres a pic of the back.


Nice!
 
  #24  
Old 05-16-2006 | 07:02 AM
LightningToGo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Looks like the airflow has to go through a hard right hand turn instead of a nice smooth 90* sweep like on the Whipple which would flow much smoother.

 
  #25  
Old 05-16-2006 | 08:39 AM
lurker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth, MI
Originally Posted by LightningToGo
Looks like the airflow has to go through a hard right hand turn instead of a nice smooth 90* sweep like on the Whipple which would flow much smoother.

Looks OK polished but it'd be ugly painted. Will they all come polished?
 
  #26  
Old 05-16-2006 | 10:50 AM
SRTthis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
ends up as shavings.

sell dat **** to a powdered metal company!!!!
 



Quick Reply: Pics of KB's 2.6L unit.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.