I was thinking today. Did Ford put the Hitch on to stiffen the rear frame? DISCUSS
#76
#77
Originally Posted by l-menace
What advantage does "tieing the suspension points" together do? Does it just make the frame and chassis stiffer, so the suspension can do its job?
I recall Tim said this a few months back...
I recall Tim said this a few months back...
It also keeps everything in proper alignment.
#78
Originally Posted by pitstain
thats the idea, you want to make the suspension do the work not the frame.....
It also keeps everything in proper alignment.
It also keeps everything in proper alignment.
The X-Factor ties the rearmost front suspension point with the diagonal frontmost rear suspension point (the leaf hangers), which is the major stiffening needed.
#79
Originally Posted by pitstain
. . . When i do a rollpan i will have some stock put in place of the stock bumper, as large as possible but still allowing install of the rollpan....
onlinemetals.com
#80
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
As I stated in another post, a 36" long, 8" wide aluminum c-channel should do the job at low cost and with minimal wieght penalty.
onlinemetals.com
onlinemetals.com
Have you mocked anything up...I assume your thinking of bolting the alluminum piece in as it couldnt be welded onto the steel
#82
#83
ttt.
seems to be a lot of discussion over a rear spider to stiffen the rear of the truck.
Which, to me, seems to serve a purpose as the rear hitch, to stiffen the rear of the Lightning's frame, since it is not boxed from the cab back.
http://www.nloc.net/vbforum/showthread.php?t=148571
DISCUSS MORE?
seems to be a lot of discussion over a rear spider to stiffen the rear of the truck.
Which, to me, seems to serve a purpose as the rear hitch, to stiffen the rear of the Lightning's frame, since it is not boxed from the cab back.
http://www.nloc.net/vbforum/showthread.php?t=148571
DISCUSS MORE?
#84
The more I analyse this problem, the more I believe that there are no easy solution.
The OEMs have addressed this issue with their new frames. To do this properly, we should box the rear section of our frames and either solidify the cross members, build stronger ones or add 1 or 2 using the new F-150 frame as a guide. Certainly not an easy job
The OEMs have addressed this issue with their new frames. To do this properly, we should box the rear section of our frames and either solidify the cross members, build stronger ones or add 1 or 2 using the new F-150 frame as a guide. Certainly not an easy job
#85
Originally Posted by TrackBeast
The more I analyse this problem, the more I believe that there are no easy solution. . . .
If the "problem" that we are talking about what's going on behind the axle, see below.
Originally Posted by l-menace
. . . Which, to me, seems to serve a purpose as the rear hitch, to stiffen the rear of the Lightning's frame, since it is not boxed from the cab back
Is a rear brace a solution looking for a problem?
#86
Originally Posted by TrackBeast
The more I analyse this problem, the more I believe that there are no easy solution.
The OEMs have addressed this issue with their new frames. To do this properly, we should box the rear section of our frames and either solidify the cross members, build stronger ones or add 1 or 2 using the new F-150 frame as a guide. Certainly not an easy job
The OEMs have addressed this issue with their new frames. To do this properly, we should box the rear section of our frames and either solidify the cross members, build stronger ones or add 1 or 2 using the new F-150 frame as a guide. Certainly not an easy job
You are going to have to simply make your own setup and build it in where you can, due to your previous statements of your exhaust not clearing an X-factor, noway, nohow....but boxing is always a good call.
#87
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
TB, it depends on which "problem" we are talking about. For general frame flex, the X-Factor works. It is a time-tested solution used by the OEMs themselves from time to time, and it is ubiquitous among weekend warriors. A tube-frame race car is just an assembly of triangulated steel tubes. What is your misgiving about the X-Factor approach?
If the "problem" that we are talking about what's going on behind the axle, see below.
That statement kinda summarizes my difficulty with this topic from the beginning. The tow hitch certainly was not intended to be a frame brace, and I don't think that you mean to suggest the contrary.
Is a rear brace a solution looking for a problem?
If the "problem" that we are talking about what's going on behind the axle, see below.
That statement kinda summarizes my difficulty with this topic from the beginning. The tow hitch certainly was not intended to be a frame brace, and I don't think that you mean to suggest the contrary.
Is a rear brace a solution looking for a problem?
Looking for a problem? Not sure at this point. With my C-notch that was done just before winter a large rear section of my frame is fully boxed but I haven't driven it enough to see if it made a difference. Maybe something like Ian's new brace or something welded to the two rails (where the bumper bolted on) might be all I need at this point. Flex will certainly be reduced. Something to address "twist" and I think I'll be happy.
I've decided that this is about as far as I want to take this truck. Where does it end? GT-500 engine? Rebuilding the frame? I have the facilities and expertise here to do almost anything but I need to start saving for my R8/R10 At that time, the truck's life will be limited to towing duty. It will be a hell of a tow truck
Last edited by TrackBeast; 02-23-2007 at 10:32 PM.
#88
Originally Posted by TrackBeast
With my custom exhaust system, there is absolutely no way to fit the X-factor. . .
Last edited by Tim Skelton; 02-23-2007 at 11:20 PM.
#89
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
is like worrying about a pimple on a severed arm.
I think I'm in pretty good shape. One thing that I did notice was what I call "the bouncing hamac effect" was conspicuous by its abscence. That would confirm that the boxing of the rear section has reduced flex. Ultimately, I need some high speed testing to confirm this with the track tires. My new longer panhard also allows my suspension to smoothly take advantage of that new found suspension travel. In high speed corners, the small one seemed to be fighting with the springs on uneven surfaces.
I'm almost there.