Lightning

Mannnnnn !!!! Look At This Thing !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 08-04-2006 | 10:31 AM
TrackBeast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RGCBSHRTY#1
According to KB's data it appears at 15psi the 2.6 made much the same hp/tq as the 2.3. This leads me to believe the 2.6's full potential won't be realized until higher boost levels are run.

Run all three at the same given boost levels - 10, 12, 14psi etc. The results could have been more useful for the average customer. Running the same size pulley on all doesn't help me in deciding what is best for my application.
At 14psi or less the results would be very similar for all blowers as long as they have the same tune.
 
  #17  
Old 08-04-2006 | 12:28 PM
RGCBSHRTY#1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos
Not necessarily, 12-14psi on the stock Eaton will not produce similar hp as a 2.3KB and with what KB claims the 2.6 should make a bit more. Even a 20hp difference is significant to warrant test results.
 
  #18  
Old 08-04-2006 | 01:49 PM
TrackBeast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RGCBSHRTY#1
Not necessarily, 12-14psi on the stock Eaton will not produce similar hp as a 2.3KB and with what KB claims the 2.6 should make a bit more. Even a 20hp difference is significant to warrant test results.

20hp on a 3000lb car is noticeable but 20hp on a 5000lb truck is certainly not significant and definitely not worth $3000 for a new blower. The 2.6 really shows its colors at 18-26lbs of boost at which point it would be worth the expense in my books anyways.
 
  #19  
Old 08-04-2006 | 02:26 PM
RGCBSHRTY#1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos
Originally Posted by TrackBeast
The 2.6 really shows its colors at 18-26lbs of boost at which point it would be worth the expense in my books anyways.
I agree regarding higher boost levels and the 2.6. KB is misleading by stating it works perfectly fine on a 100% stock vehicle, when the 2.3 may be the better choice for those wanting 15 or less psi. In speaking with a KB tech, it was stated the 2.6 would be better at 14-15psi than the 2.3. My concern in speaking with him was the lower boost levels and efficiency. Again it was stated that due to cooler discharge temps the 2.6 is the way to go. KB's test results say otherwise. Either they're leaving something out or would like to sell more 2.6's.
 
  #20  
Old 08-04-2006 | 08:24 PM
todd abbott's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Milford Connecticut
Rafa, I never said I'd trade the power for volume, just throwing out the facts, it's quiet.
 
  #21  
Old 08-04-2006 | 08:54 PM
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa



Quick Reply: Mannnnnn !!!! Look At This Thing !!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM.