LFP or Accufab?
#1
07-14-2007, 07:52 PM
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
07-15-2007, 11:33 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Milford Connecticut
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
07-15-2007, 11:39 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CORAL SPRINGS, FL. USA
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
07-15-2007, 07:52 PM
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
07-16-2007, 01:52 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just put the LFP on my truck. I had an Accufab and and the BBK Twin.
My rating on quality of finish fit and operability,
1. LFP
2. BBK
3. Accufab
With the BBk, stock block, made 466/535. 91 pump gas. Only changed to the LFP for the looks, but it is a quality piece.
The Accufab gave me idle speed headaches, and the mechanical quality was less than expected, it looked nice though.
My $.02
My rating on quality of finish fit and operability,
1. LFP
2. BBK
3. Accufab
With the BBk, stock block, made 466/535. 91 pump gas. Only changed to the LFP for the looks, but it is a quality piece.
The Accufab gave me idle speed headaches, and the mechanical quality was less than expected, it looked nice though.
My $.02
#7
07-16-2007, 06:44 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/ LIGHTNING FAST
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"i Agree
Originally Posted by FireGuy
I just put the LFP on my truck. I had an Accufab and and the BBK Twin.
My rating on quality of finish fit and operability,
1. LFP
2. BBK
3. Accufab
With the BBk, stock block, made 466/535. 91 pump gas. Only changed to the LFP for the looks, but it is a quality piece.
The Accufab gave me idle speed headaches, and the mechanical quality was less than expected, it looked nice though.
My $.02
My rating on quality of finish fit and operability,
1. LFP
2. BBK
3. Accufab
With the BBk, stock block, made 466/535. 91 pump gas. Only changed to the LFP for the looks, but it is a quality piece.
The Accufab gave me idle speed headaches, and the mechanical quality was less than expected, it looked nice though.
My $.02
Trending Topics
#9
07-16-2007, 08:26 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree too...I have an Accufab. It looks great, but has idle issues...just a few hundred rpms too high. The idle is WAY too high on initial start up. I was sort of let down by that problem, but on the other hand, the throttle response did pick up. My tuner thinks he can solve the idle, but I haven't gotten the truck in for that yet.
Another difference I've found, is that for the same throttle input, it seems like the truck is in the boost alot quicker and earlier. To me, I don't like hearing the engine in boost for a normal acceleration. Sounds like it is working too hard. Does that make sense?
I'm actually considering going back to stock (or going with the LFP one).
Another difference I've found, is that for the same throttle input, it seems like the truck is in the boost alot quicker and earlier. To me, I don't like hearing the engine in boost for a normal acceleration. Sounds like it is working too hard. Does that make sense?
I'm actually considering going back to stock (or going with the LFP one).
#10
07-17-2007, 02:13 PM
#11
07-19-2007, 11:52 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Hampton, N.Y.
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts