Lightning

350z vs L.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:10 PM
TrackBeast's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-rev
even stock to stock? my mom and 2 of my friends have 350z's and they are pretty friken fast. i guess i just have a hard time beliveing a truck being faster than a sports car.
When the Lightning was introduced back in 1999, it was one of the 10 fastest vehicles you could buy in North America. That included top end, 0-60 and quarter mile. That included everything from ferrari, Lambo, NSX, vette... I remember reading an article titled "Power Nation" or something like that.

Today, many fast vehicles have been introduced but let's not forget that the Lightning is a 1998 design and therefore 10 years old. Its still relatively pretty damn quick.

The 350Z has nice styling but the first few years of production that car was a piece of junk. Nissan/Renault have completely re-engineered that car since it first came out. Nissan is still by far the lowest quality Jap car on the market and their trucks; Armada, Titan, Q56 are a bunch of crap riddled with quality issues with quality rating even below Dodge.
 

Last edited by TrackBeast; 11-29-2007 at 12:16 PM.
  #17  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:03 PM
t-rev's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black02SVTL
You don't have a Lightning so I guess you've never experienced a sports truck.
not to get anyone PO'd but i guess youve never experienced a sports car.
 
  #18  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:14 PM
khendrix2374's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Murray , Kentucky
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-rev
not to get anyone PO'd but i guess youve never experienced a sports car.
Neither have you if you think a 14 second car is a "real sports car".

A stock 13 second lightning is fast... for a truck.

When you start dipping into the low 12's.. then your moving. Then you can really call it a sports car... but that's all just my opinion.
 
  #19  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:29 PM
t-rev's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if an SVT stock is running 13's then what is a mustang gt running?
 
  #20  
Old 11-30-2007, 12:44 AM
Tim Skelton's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stop wasting time with labels.

The 350Z is fast by car standards. Period. Others are faster, but it's still fast by any rational metric.

The Lighting was (and still is) fast by truck standards. Period. The cool part is that it's also fast by car standards. And that's also the problematic part, because it's tempting to start comparing it with cars. But it's still just a hotrodded farm implement, and certainly not a "sports car," no matter how quick it is.

And the "sports truck" label, while I'm guilty of using it myself, doesn't help. A stock Miata can give a Lightning a run for its money of a road course.

To impose a 12-second limit on the definition of "sports car" would eliminate virtually every great sports car of the 20th Century (as well as the entire "muscle car" era). A Porsche Speedster is an iconic "sports car," but would have trouble keeping up with most modern family cars.
 

Last edited by Tim Skelton; 11-30-2007 at 12:48 AM.
  #21  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:57 PM
Kirkster's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Lightning is faster...

The stock Lightning is faster than the stock Z. I own both so I do have a baseline to compare them against. Now the 07 and newer Z would be a bit closer (probably a driver issue) but I think the Lightning is faster. I did just test drive an 08 on Thursday.

Tempting but I think I am just going to Supercharge the Z...
 
  #22  
Old 11-30-2007, 08:34 PM
Falcon11's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-rev
if an SVT stock is running 13's then what is a mustang gt running?

13's. They weigh less but the "SVT" has 80 more hp and 130 ft/lbs more torque.
 
  #23  
Old 12-01-2007, 09:29 AM
Red00Lght's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the beauty of the Lightning in comparison to the Z and alot of other high performance vehicles, is that for about a thousand bucks, you can significantly increase the HP of the lightning. Try doing the same with the Z with the same amount of money. Ain't gonna happen.
 
  #24  
Old 12-01-2007, 11:52 PM
khendrix2374's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Murray , Kentucky
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tim, you are right. Lables don't really give justice.

A 350Z would most likely smoke a lightning on a road course. in straight line motion is all I was referring to.

I was kind of mentally thinking about what I think is fast in my head. To me, when you hit the 12 second zone in the 1/4 mile..... that's a fast vehicle. Driving a 12 second capable vehicle on the street will be faster than most any other cars on the road. At least around here. In bigger cities, there may be alot of faster cars (I know there is).. but still 12 seconds is fast. 12.99 is faster than most street cars.
 
  #25  
Old 12-05-2007, 06:51 PM
SVT_KY's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 4,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by t-rev
even stock to stock? my mom and 2 of my friends have 350z's and they are pretty friken fast. i guess i just have a hard time beliveing a truck being faster than a sports car.
HEH HEH HEH .... what about a truck that out manuevers them? Or actually two or three trucks ...

Do yourself a favor ... go bum a ride in a lightning
 
  #26  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:27 AM
seattlesnake's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-rev
not to get anyone PO'd but i guess youve never experienced a sports car.
Dude, RU kidding?

I've got aLightning, and a sports car...
http://www.geocities.com/meyer-thoma....net/index.htm
 
  #27  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:00 PM
YtDiamond05's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He has to be kidding. Probably a 16yo kid looking to see if he can get people fired up. Ha, a 350z, what a joke.
 
  #28  
Old 12-07-2007, 08:13 AM
BRUCEWRS's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hobe Sound Florida
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-rev
if an SVT stock is running 13's then what is a mustang gt running?
Mustang GT's STOCK run High 13's low 14's...Do yourself a favor,Go to the track and watch...
 

Last edited by BRUCEWRS; 12-07-2007 at 08:15 AM.
  #29  
Old 12-08-2007, 12:19 PM
MotorcycleMan's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nicholasville, Ky
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock for stock, I have YET to have a good run from a 350Z. It's all (most) a waste of gas.

I can go 13.8s all day long in my truck (Hot lapping it), with a 13.46 (Med 50F and a cool down) being my best at over 101mph.
 
  #30  
Old 12-30-2007, 10:29 AM
Flash2211's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: E-Town, KY
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well well well....another debate, let's add some more...I have the lightning and a srt charger (4 door family wagon), both are fast (quick) and I like the charger, but nothing beats smokin' some of the local cars (i.e. 350 z's) around here in an 'supercharged farm implement'.....charger is fast, but it's a different kind of 'fast', but then again people expected me to 'spank' them back in my Supra, but sure is nice to 'do that' with the wife and kids in the car as well....
 


Quick Reply: 350z vs L.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 AM.