2+4=6 in my book, same with up and down pulleys?
#1
#2
#3
That was interesting. But the real question I have I guess is... If you have a smaller than stock on the top and you have something that spins it faster on the bottom, then you will have an accelerated motion/spin on the top (even more so than they would expect). It would make it more like a 7# or 8# pully, no?
Lets pretend that octane isn't a problem and I can adjust it at will without retarding it. Can I run more boost with the stock eaton supercharger? Will it even be nominal the extra spin that I get from the "accelerated motion"?
I knew I shouldn't have slept in trig.
Lets pretend that octane isn't a problem and I can adjust it at will without retarding it. Can I run more boost with the stock eaton supercharger? Will it even be nominal the extra spin that I get from the "accelerated motion"?
I knew I shouldn't have slept in trig.
#4
I would assume that the person that creates the say 2lb upper pulley has already taken the lower stock ratio aspect into consideration.
So I would say that you simply need to figure the stock blower rpm to PSI rations per size of the stock pullies to start with.
Next calulate the rpms of say a +2lb pulley and calculate the new rpms to make again +2lbs. YOu can also play with the lower +2lb pulley sizes.
I'm not sure but I suspect by playing with the number you'll find out pretty quickley if this calulation is linear or not. I bet you'll see a relationship between blower rpm and psi is linear.
Remember c = pi (r x 2) or c = r x d ' r 3.1415926
So I would say that you simply need to figure the stock blower rpm to PSI rations per size of the stock pullies to start with.
Next calulate the rpms of say a +2lb pulley and calculate the new rpms to make again +2lbs. YOu can also play with the lower +2lb pulley sizes.
I'm not sure but I suspect by playing with the number you'll find out pretty quickley if this calulation is linear or not. I bet you'll see a relationship between blower rpm and psi is linear.
Remember c = pi (r x 2) or c = r x d ' r 3.1415926
#5
Moonshine:
I flunked Advanced Algebra at Miami Senior High........... Having said that, yes, 2 + 4 = 6 in this case. Is it 'really' 5.851 lbs or 6.324 lbs--don't know, but it's 'close' to 6 lbs.
Several guys run an upper and a lower and show the expected boost level on their aftermarket(ie: accurate) boost gauge. Get your chip tuner up-to-speed on your pulleys and boost question and the two of you will be successful.
Dan
Several guys run an upper and a lower and show the expected boost level on their aftermarket(ie: accurate) boost gauge. Get your chip tuner up-to-speed on your pulleys and boost question and the two of you will be successful.
Dan