rear end, and mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-04-2004, 07:33 PM
recon_sct's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rear end, and mpg

ok...
I use to have a 2002 f150 and traded for a pos car and realized how awsome my truck was, so i am in the market for a new truck.

I was wondering what gear ratio would give better gas mileage, the 3.55 or the 3.73?

thanks for the replys

scouts out!
 
  #2  
Old 09-04-2004, 08:31 PM
max mitchell's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With highway only, the 3.55s will get better mileage. In the city, the difference is negligible. If I had that choice, I would pick 3.73s 100% of the time. Avoid 3.08s and 3.31s like the plague.
 
  #3  
Old 09-06-2004, 02:56 AM
vvyk3d's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you'll be unhappy with anything less than a 3.73. Im getting 15mpg in town with my 4x4 3.73. These trucks are way too heavy to cripple them with a 3.55. They should have offered a 4.11.

Dan
 
  #4  
Old 09-07-2004, 12:34 PM
bigtruck311's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: oceanside C.A.
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
it depends on tire size if keeping it stock i agree with the other posts if not tell me and i will get a link for you
 
  #5  
Old 09-07-2004, 01:28 PM
vvyk3d's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good call on the tire size, makes quite a difference if you plan to change.

Dan
 
  #6  
Old 09-07-2004, 04:16 PM
Recurve's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're always going to have those who have to have the biggest over the most useful and practical. I see it in guns. Shooting a caliber and missing-but at the highest speed possible and man is it BIG!

Get the 3.55. It's not at all "crippled" and the highway gas mileage adds up!
 
  #7  
Old 09-07-2004, 05:37 PM
bigtruck311's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: oceanside C.A.
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
recurve, i do not understand the gun post, i think bigger is better, more powerfull is better, performance and towing capacity is better.
 

Trending Topics

  #8  
Old 09-07-2004, 05:53 PM
Trever Adamo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Huntington Beach CA
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 03 with 3:55 and it is just fine and i pull a tralier that is about 6500 and it does just fine but if i was to get a 04 i would go with the 3:73
 
  #9  
Old 09-07-2004, 05:55 PM
Trever Adamo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Huntington Beach CA
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 03 Screw with the 5.4 and it has 3:55 and 275/75/17 and it is just fine and i pull a tralier that is about 6500 and it does just fine but if i was to get a 04 i would go with the 3:73
 
  #10  
Old 09-08-2004, 06:36 AM
Recurve's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think more efficient is better. Since the 3.55 will do everything I want it to do AND get better MPG, (with gas prices these days that is significant) then that is the smartest choice for me. Now if I REALLY NEED the "extra performance" then the 373 would be. If you need biggest, why not get a Hemi? I don't need to compensate by having the biggest...truck! Look at all the families with one kid driving Expeditions who never go off road-something else is going on here besides performance and need or the would have a minivan.
 
  #11  
Old 09-08-2004, 11:28 AM
bigtruck311's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: oceanside C.A.
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
go with 3.73 you wont regret it, you will get .1111 miles less per gallon but if you want to tow you can do it easyer, you will be qiuker off the line and your truck will just feel quicker, if you want to move up a tire size it wont cause wear on your tranny, your tranny will be slightly cooler temps and in the long run less wear on the tranny, 3.73 all the way better
 
  #12  
Old 09-08-2004, 01:33 PM
vvyk3d's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have an excellent idea for you recon. Go to your dealership and drive both of them. If you can tolerate already sluggish off the line performance of the new 04 with a 3.55 vs a 3.73 then go for the 3.55. You will save gas money this is true. Im betting if your like 80% of the people that bought an 04 your going to be unhappy with its accelleration and want every advantage you can get. If you havent driven one yet go out and do it. Its nothing like the years previous.

In response to recurves thoughts. You shouldn't generalize just because people in your neighborhood buy things they dont need. There are many people on this board that tow cars, boats, etc. They need the 3.73 for getting off the line better. Others want more performance, so they need it for that. It has nothing to do with compensation. It has to do with paying 35-40k and getting what you want. You opted for efficiency but the majority of people do need the 3.73 either for business or pleasure. Either way they are still kick *** trucks.

PS - Expeditions look better than minivans. Thats why they buy SUVs over minivans.


Dan
 

Last edited by vvyk3d; 09-08-2004 at 01:49 PM.
  #13  
Old 09-08-2004, 05:20 PM
Recurve's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Dan,

As I said above, if you really need the 3.73 for those performance needs (towing etc.) then you SHOULD get it. I originally responded to the comment that (gist): "You really won't be happy if you cripple it with a 3.55." Some, like me, prefer the 3.55 and don't consider it at all "crippled" but an advantage over the 3.73 for the way we use a truck.

Even if it was an only 1.11 MPG gain over the 3.73 (and I believe it to be more), add that up over the life of the car! If you keep a car a long time like I do, that is a LOT of free miles VS the people I was generalizing about who never actually need the "extra towing" but have to have the biggest "just because." I'm betting that there are a lot more of those folks than those who actually would benefit from the 3.73. What is the FACTUAL, TESTED 0-60 difference between the 3.55 and the 3.73?

Nothing wrong with generalizing, actually. It's not a sin.

Steve
 
  #14  
Old 09-08-2004, 06:03 PM
bigtruck311's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: oceanside C.A.
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
good post vvyk3d
 
  #15  
Old 09-09-2004, 09:00 AM
jjszabo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went from 3.31's to 4.10's in my 00 Expedition because I tow a Large Camper and only lost about 1.0 mpg when driving around town. I attribute it to better efficient use of the power. I use less peddle to get it going - less peddle, less gas. When driving on the highway, 60mph the rpms are 2000 w/ overdrive on. With the 3.31's the rpms were around 1500 and I really had to stomp on the peddle to pass. Now with the new gears, I have plenty of passing power without overly having to press the peddle. The higher gears equate to better power efficiency - only to a point though.

My one cent worth.

Jeff
 


Quick Reply: rear end, and mpg



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.