New intake manifold!!
#16
Originally Posted by Neal
yeh i had found em right after i posted that.. he wants 379 for the 2v ones.. he sure is damn proud of those things.. i think me and mark might could make some for cheaper.. if not ill probably just buy them. but im sure someone else makes them by now.
#18
Originally Posted by built54
I wish i had a cnc machine...
yeh ive got a couple buddies with some machine shops. but who knows if they'd have time to make some for me. and the best thing to make them out of would be ABS plastic so it doesnt transfer heat to the intake manifold thus reducing intake temps. but i prolly will end up forking over the bucks for it. im still indecissive on going 5.4 or sticking with 4.6 id have to buy so much stuff for the 5.4 short block just for a little bit more torque and not alot more HP. so in im probably sticking with my 4.6
#19
Originally Posted by Faster150
yeh ive got a couple buddies with some machine shops. but who knows if they'd have time to make some for me. and the best thing to make them out of would be ABS plastic so it doesnt transfer heat to the intake manifold thus reducing intake temps. but i prolly will end up forking over the bucks for it. im still indecissive on going 5.4 or sticking with 4.6 id have to buy so much stuff for the 5.4 short block just for a little bit more torque and not alot more HP. so in im probably sticking with my 4.6
That's the only sacrifice? Seems like with the 5.4 you would get a stretched out power-band - a longer pull. I imagine you know what your talking about . Is there a significant weight difference between the two motors? Also , I'm sure Neal looked at these specs and weight is a critical aspect in his build. Why wouldn't he opt for the 4.6L over the 5.4 .
Something about my non PI motor , although slightly modded w/type 3injectors from the 2000 crown vic motor and harness along with COP'S and open intake sporting the K&N filter + the flowmaster 50 series (non SUV model) . My buddy's Supercrew's can't keep up with it lol - They have more flywheel HP , but I smoke them from start and anywhere else in the powerband, my 98 supercab pulls away and it pisses them off bigtime lol. I figure the injectors upgrade is the biggest contributor because it never ran that well before I added that.
It could also be because there truck is heavier, not sure..
Last edited by jbrew; 12-02-2006 at 04:04 PM.
#20
Originally Posted by jbrew
That's the only sacrifice? Seems like with the 5.4 you would get a stretched out power-band - a longer pull. I imagine you know what your talking about . Is there a significant weight difference between the two motors? Also , I'm sure Neal looked at these specs and weight is a critical aspect in his build. Why wouldn't he opt for the 4.6L over the 5.4 .
Something about my non PI motor , although slightly modded w/type 3injectors from the 2000 crown vic motor and harness along with COP'S and open intake sporting the K&N filter + the flowmaster 50 series (non SUV model) . My buddy's Supercrew's can't keep up with it lol - They have more flywheel HP , but I smoke them from start and anywhere else in the powerband, my 98 supercab pulls away and it pisses them off bigtime lol. I figure the injectors upgrade is the biggest contributor because it never ran that well before I added that.
It could also be because there truck is heavier, not sure..
Something about my non PI motor , although slightly modded w/type 3injectors from the 2000 crown vic motor and harness along with COP'S and open intake sporting the K&N filter + the flowmaster 50 series (non SUV model) . My buddy's Supercrew's can't keep up with it lol - They have more flywheel HP , but I smoke them from start and anywhere else in the powerband, my 98 supercab pulls away and it pisses them off bigtime lol. I figure the injectors upgrade is the biggest contributor because it never ran that well before I added that.
It could also be because there truck is heavier, not sure..
#22
Originally Posted by Faster150
a stroked motor makes alotta of low to mid range power. a square bore or small block makes good mid range to top end power. the 4.6 makes more HP per liter than the 5.4L and weights about 150lbs less. the 5.4 has windage problems, bearing wear, piston slap, and doesnt like to rev even built safely. many will argue it but ill take reliability over a motor that will make a little bit more power for a short period of time.
#30
Evertime I get my license it's at the DMV not the DEV
Must be alittle more than just long rods in the 5.4 cause the pistons are going to move the same distance in either case due to the stroke of the crankshaft. You can't increase displacement with just long rods. It's a combo of bore size, head chamber size, crankshaft throw, deck height and correct rod lenght that makes it all work
Must be alittle more than just long rods in the 5.4 cause the pistons are going to move the same distance in either case due to the stroke of the crankshaft. You can't increase displacement with just long rods. It's a combo of bore size, head chamber size, crankshaft throw, deck height and correct rod lenght that makes it all work