Modular Engine Phase out!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-19-2009 | 08:16 PM
mustangtoby's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Modular Engine Phase out!

Pg 18 of the new Four Wheeler mag, says Ford is phasing out the modular family, to be replaced by the Coyote engine, four valves per cylinder, 5.0 Liter, and a goal of 400 hp and 400 ft lbs!
 
  #2  
Old 03-19-2009 | 08:35 PM
Camarothatcould's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 2
From: NW Indiana
Oh dear. same hp as the early 00 LS engines. . .
 
  #3  
Old 03-22-2009 | 12:20 PM
mustangtoby's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Thanks, dude. Just wanted to share some good news, sorry you can't be happy. go drive your camero.
 
  #4  
Old 03-22-2009 | 02:20 PM
chiefFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Originally Posted by mustangtoby
Thanks, dude. Just wanted to share some good news, sorry you can't be happy. go drive your camero.
this isnt anything new. chill out.
 
  #5  
Old 03-22-2009 | 04:16 PM
shifty_85's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 0
From: farmington hills, MI
his camaro is broke rember? it was a good tool bench when he pulled his 4.6 out.

ford shoulda kept the 5.8 and the 5.0 and never had any of this modular BS id much rather have a 5.0 over my 4.6. and i know guys with 5.4s that would rather have 5.8's
 
  #6  
Old 03-22-2009 | 04:25 PM
Camarothatcould's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 2
From: NW Indiana
I'd keep it how it is. Lets keep Chevy pushrod, and ford modular. I like my 5.4, even though its the lowest rated of them, its still a good engine. I'd choose it over a Vortec 5.7
 
  #7  
Old 03-22-2009 | 05:01 PM
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 15
From: MI
Favorite Factory set up =



Not only reliable, - it's bad a$$!!
 
  #8  
Old 03-22-2009 | 05:28 PM
Camarothatcould's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 2
From: NW Indiana
and that is exactly what
 
  #9  
Old 03-22-2009 | 05:30 PM
shifty_85's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 0
From: farmington hills, MI
lightning motor Supercharged 5.4L OOOOO SEXY TIME!!! ill take one of those too Jbrew
 
  #10  
Old 03-22-2009 | 05:47 PM
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
yeah i agree.....
 
  #11  
Old 03-22-2009 | 05:52 PM
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 41
From: So. Texas
5.0 Liter, and a goal of 400 hp and 400 ft lbs!
I wouldn't run out and press yer dress for graduation on that news. You'll likely never see it at those numbers in an F150. Mustang....maybe, F150, no. Expect the realistic numbers for the F150 to be more in line with 250hp max and maybe 280lb torque. Ford already has the larger engine covered and this will be the replacement for the 4.6. Not the replacement for all Tritons. I'm looking forward to it though. The 4.6 has been a wonderful and extremely reliable platform. But considering it's physical size, it's not very practical. The 5.4 has never been a good engine and Ford saw that early in it's life. While we all have our favorites, it's time for the 5.4 and all of the issues with it to go away. I expect the 5.4 to be remembered like the 6.0 diesel. If you got a good one you were blessed. But the luck of the draw was lousy for far too many folks.

You might also be seeing a newer version of the 6.2 with a lower deck height. As proposed, it would be in the same size as the current 5.4 at around 330 cu in. Until they fully develop this engine, I expect to see the 5.0 and the 6.2 as the engines available for the F150 with different power outputs as options.
 
  #12  
Old 03-22-2009 | 06:28 PM
Faster150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth,Tx
Originally Posted by Labnerd
I wouldn't run out and press yer dress for graduation on that news. You'll likely never see it at those numbers in an F150. Mustang....maybe, F150, no. Expect the realistic numbers for the F150 to be more in line with 250hp max and maybe 280lb torque. Ford already has the larger engine covered and this will be the replacement for the 4.6. Not the replacement for all Tritons. I'm looking forward to it though. The 4.6 has been a wonderful and extremely reliable platform. But considering it's physical size, it's not very practical. The 5.4 has never been a good engine and Ford saw that early in it's life. While we all have our favorites, it's time for the 5.4 and all of the issues with it to go away. I expect the 5.4 to be remembered like the 6.0 diesel. If you got a good one you were blessed. But the luck of the draw was lousy for far too many folks.

You might also be seeing a newer version of the 6.2 with a lower deck height. As proposed, it would be in the same size as the current 5.4 at around 330 cu in. Until they fully develop this engine, I expect to see the 5.0 and the 6.2 as the engines available for the F150 with different power outputs as options.
amen to that.
 
  #13  
Old 03-22-2009 | 07:33 PM
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 15
From: MI
Originally Posted by shifty_85
lightning motor Supercharged 5.4L OOOOO SEXY TIME!!! ill take one of those too Jbrew
That's an 03 Stock Set-up I bid on. From Jackson Michigan. The guy purchased the engine directly from Ford for a Hot Rod project that never happened. I only had about 3800 to spare at the time. - Not sure what it went for - around 6 grand I think.

Not positive, but I think this guy purchased it -

https://www.f150online.com/forums/v8...pics-info.html

Here's what she sounds like -

http://s75.photobucket.com/albums/i2...ynoTune007.flv

http://s75.photobucket.com/albums/i2...t=MVI_1057.flv
 

Last edited by jbrew; 03-22-2009 at 07:40 PM.
  #14  
Old 03-22-2009 | 08:49 PM
Buck50's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Canoga Park,Ca
i was always under the impression that the block was good, it was just the internals that sucked in the 5.4.
 
  #15  
Old 03-22-2009 | 09:40 PM
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Labnerd
I wouldn't run out and press yer dress for graduation on that news. You'll likely never see it at those numbers in an F150. Mustang....maybe, F150, no. Expect the realistic numbers for the F150 to be more in line with 250hp max and maybe 280lb torque. Ford already has the larger engine covered and this will be the replacement for the 4.6. Not the replacement for all Tritons. I'm looking forward to it though. The 4.6 has been a wonderful and extremely reliable platform. But considering it's physical size, it's not very practical. The 5.4 has never been a good engine and Ford saw that early in it's life. While we all have our favorites, it's time for the 5.4 and all of the issues with it to go away. I expect the 5.4 to be remembered like the 6.0 diesel. If you got a good one you were blessed. But the luck of the draw was lousy for far too many folks.

You might also be seeing a newer version of the 6.2 with a lower deck height. As proposed, it would be in the same size as the current 5.4 at around 330 cu in. Until they fully develop this engine, I expect to see the 5.0 and the 6.2 as the engines available for the F150 with different power outputs as options.
Since when has the 5.4 never been a good engine! You must be kidding me!......
 


Quick Reply: Modular Engine Phase out!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.