Baby's got new shoes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-11-2000 | 02:20 AM
nomo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 2
From: OK
Smile Baby's got new shoes

Had 285/60R16 Goodyear Eagle GT IIs installed all around on my F150. They have a nice wide look and traction is a billion times better than the crappy General AWs. Spinning tires is now an effort, instead of an embarrasing (and unsafe) part of city driving.

------------------
1997 4x4 Expedition- 4.6L, true dual exhaust w/glass-packs, K&N air filter, SuperChip, airbox mods, Edelbrock shocks, 285/75R16 BFG ATs, 2000 "XLT" wheels, 4.10 gears, Auburn LS, Clarion In-dash CD player, Smitty Bilt push bars and nerf bars.

2000 4x2 F150 XLT Reg. Cab LWB- 5.4L, Tow Pkg, 3.55LS, CD player,Remote Keyless Entry, Sliding back glass, Special Appearance Pkg., tinted windows, Line-X bedliner, 285/60R16 Goodyear Eagle GT IIs and Prime #155 wheels.

http://members.visualcities.com/NoMo

 
  #2  
Old 07-10-2000 | 12:28 PM
Chris Thomas's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL USA
Cool

Did you post about these tires earlier? If so I wish I would have seen it because I would have tried to change your mind. The Goodyear Eagle GT II tires came stock on my STX package in 275/60R17 size. They are pretty good tires, but I really don't like their wet traction at all. Most goodyears have that reputation. I would have went with the BF Goodrich Comp TA HR4 tires. Replaced the goodyear eagle gatorbacks on one of my wifes Mustang's with the Z rated Comp TA's and they have much better wet traction. But you are right, they are still a billon times better than the generals...

[This message has been edited by Chris Thomas (edited 07-10-2000).]
 
  #3  
Old 07-11-2000 | 11:46 AM
nomo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 2
From: OK
Post

I had considered both, but went with the GYs just because of price. It was pretty tough convincing the wife that tires with only 3k miles needed replaced.

So far (and we've had quite a lot of rain), I've got no complaints. Wet traction is terrific- but that is comparing to the Generals. Next time, I'll probably do the BFGs if Firestone still doesn't have the firehawk in that size.
 
  #4  
Old 07-12-2000 | 09:57 AM
Chris Thomas's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL USA
Cool

I can understand that. My wet traction was better too when the truck was new, but I am at about 25k miles now. The tread still looks great but the wet traction is not as good. Of couse that fact that I have developed heavy foot syndrome could have something to do with that too.
 




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.