i want to fit 33's
#1
#2
#3
I found that 305's on a 3 inch spindle lift were just rubbing on tight turns on my 2WD 2000. 285's would make it no problem.
I planned to add daystar 1 1/2 inch coil spacers to solve that, but i did my body lift first. Next weekend new springs and spacers go in ...
I planned to add daystar 1 1/2 inch coil spacers to solve that, but i did my body lift first. Next weekend new springs and spacers go in ...
Last edited by nserafini; 09-28-2008 at 05:35 PM.
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I don't see you fitting even 285's stock height. I just sold my 99 2wd. Stock height, on stock 16's I could only fit 265/75's. After my 3" spindle lift, I was able to fit 285/75's with no rubbing on stock wheels. The 3" allowed JUST enough clearance for the 33's, after putting on my brush guard my tires rubbed again from the loss in height from spring compression. So no, there's no way in hell you're going to fit a 33" tire with no lift, or even a leveling kit for that matter. Hope that clears it up.
#9
#10
This is true, the increased width contributed to the rubbing, most of which could have been cured with some trimming. For a 2wd though, a spindle is about the only way to get enough lift to clear those tires without aftermarket control arms. The factory control arms are only good for up to 3" of lift. You could do that with a spring, large spacer, or a combination of both; but you would be putting your joints at the limit of their angles and Seriously reducing wear life. Spindles retain factory geometry. (and allow for another 3" of lift to add on top!)
(I forgot to mention, mine did not rub with 285's on a 3'' spindle. Rubbing was only after putting on a Very heavy brush guard. My mistake.)
(I forgot to mention, mine did not rub with 285's on a 3'' spindle. Rubbing was only after putting on a Very heavy brush guard. My mistake.)
Last edited by CountryPunk; 10-08-2008 at 12:39 PM. Reason: wrong.