Which of these two is worse on your MPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-30-2013, 04:08 PM
Cuz's Avatar
Cuz
Cuz is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which of these two is worse on your MPG?

Help me settle an "argument". In your experience/knowledge which hurts your MPG worse, 35"x12.5" all terrain tires OR a 2.5" level/lift? Can anyone say for for sure??

You have two new F150's. They are identical. Truck "A" has the 35" tires but stock rake. Truck "B" has stock size tires but a 2.5 level on front and 3" blocks on back. Which truck will Avg better MPG, A or B? And just for fun, how big of a difference in MPG would there be between A and B?
 

Last edited by Cuz; 06-30-2013 at 04:22 PM.
  #2  
Old 06-30-2013, 04:19 PM
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Administrator
Contributor
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 21,312
Received 135 Likes on 112 Posts
Tires are worse, you're adding taller diameter (effectively raising your gear ratio) as well as the added rolling resistance, and unsprung weight of them. And going from a 255 (10" wide) to a 12.5" is making it even less aerodynamic.
 
  #3  
Old 06-30-2013, 05:58 PM
STXXXSTAR13's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: WESTERN NY
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im gonna have to agree with that completely. a level kit will do virtually nothing to impact a trucks mpg because your not changing anything that will essentially make the truck work harder in some form or another. a stock truck with 35's, reguardless of wether you have 3:55's or 3:73's for gear ratio on a 4wd or whatever the 2wd come in(not familiar with those), a 4.6, 5.4 or 5.8 will all lower your mpg to some degree. depending on how and what you drive in, as in city/hwy, will determine how high or low that number turns out to be. it might be 1-2 mpg or even 3 or 4. but adding that 3+ inches of total diameter along with weight and surface contact will have some degree of change in your fuel economy
 

Last edited by STXXXSTAR13; 06-30-2013 at 06:00 PM.
  #4  
Old 06-30-2013, 11:41 PM
Cuz's Avatar
Cuz
Cuz is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys. Anybody else?
 
  #5  
Old 07-01-2013, 12:49 AM
jdeacon's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agree with above
 
  #6  
Old 07-01-2013, 12:52 AM
Barrett's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What they have said. However the biggest element on causing MPG to go one way or the other is the driver of said trucks.
 
  #7  
Old 07-01-2013, 02:22 AM
russ10screw's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with above. Tires for sure.
 
  #8  
Old 07-01-2013, 03:13 AM
Galaxy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrett
However the biggest element on causing MPG to go one way or the other is the driver of said trucks.
Not even remotely true or correct. You take a stock geared truck and put 35's on it, I don't care how two guys drive, the guy with 35's is goign to lose fuel economy. Even if you baby the crap out of it to the point it's not even enjoyable to drive, the truck with stock tires will get better fuel mileage even when driven normally to slightly spirited.
 
  #9  
Old 07-01-2013, 09:19 AM
Barrett's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Galaxy
Not even remotely true or correct. You take a stock geared truck and put 35's on it, I don't care how two guys drive, the guy with 35's is goign to lose fuel economy. Even if you baby the crap out of it to the point it's not even enjoyable to drive, the truck with stock tires will get better fuel mileage even when driven normally to slightly spirited.
Said its a big factor to it. Not that it's the only thing. No need to get angry there chief
 
  #10  
Old 07-01-2013, 10:30 AM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,286
Received 774 Likes on 715 Posts
You may lose a very small amount with the level kit because you are changing the factory aerodynamics.
 
  #11  
Old 07-01-2013, 10:51 AM
Pockets's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Surely the larger tires.

I have done it all did leveling kit and noticed nothing than slightly larger tire and went down than exhaust and it tanked and lift forget about it.
 
  #12  
Old 07-01-2013, 02:51 PM
Cuz's Avatar
Cuz
Cuz is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I went from avg 17mpg to avg 13.5 mpg when I did the level and tires. My buddy says its the lift that killed me. I think it was the tires. I mean surely both effect it but the tires have to be a large percentage of that 3.5 miles per gal lost?
Before I switch back to closer to stock size, does anyone have a realistic idea of how many mpg I will gain back by going back to a slightly over stick size AT tire?
Thanks guys!
 
  #13  
Old 07-01-2013, 02:58 PM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Posts: 26,030
Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts
Depending on tire and wheel size, they will cost you 1 to 2 mpg. Weight, width compound and tread are all a factor. The higher you lift the more mpg you lose as well. A level being slight but lifts as much as 2 mpg.
 
__________________
Jim
  #14  
Old 07-01-2013, 03:33 PM
Cuz's Avatar
Cuz
Cuz is offline
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, well I sure hate to go thru the trouble of a switch to gain 1 mpg. I was thinking/hoping 2-3 mpg. That'd save me over $100 a month in fuel!
 
  #15  
Old 07-01-2013, 04:41 PM
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you have the speedometer (and in effect, odometer) recalibrated to adjust fer yer new tire size? If not, you'll be showing that you're traveling slower (and fewer miles) than you really are. A 4 mpg difference (over 22% decrease) sounds excessive even considering yer lift and tires.

I switched to a 275/70/18 Cooper ST Maxx (AT/MT "hybrid") and a 2" Zone leveling kit and dropped around 1 mpg.
 


Quick Reply: Which of these two is worse on your MPG?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.